911 - September 11, 2001

Update 3/23/2018 - added notes I found
Update 4/25/2018 - Pls review link 
Update 7/21/2018 - more notes to be finished 7/22/2018
                                Three Videos
Update 7/22/2018 - yipes! Not finished but I provided more!  Check it out! 
Update 7/23/2018 - completed notes on a Prof Detective's discoveries, 911 Inside Out...
Update, 8/21/2018,  video from APlaneTruth


Please copy, share whatever you want from this blog – it is ad-free, unmonitored.  Thank you for paying that forward. 


Update 4/25/2018:   Please review this link asap! http://www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/mike-pompeo.html 


Feel free to access almost all of my other posts through The links here: http://www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/table-of-contents.html  



We have signs for a reason - to follow directions!  Yet our country has been rittled with those who do not and get richer and richer from their corruption - pedophilia - drug trafficking - murdering - felony after felony!

Operation Mockingbird has been resurrected! False stories about innocent, good patriots like Mike Pence have been in the works and once they were ready to pounce, they pounced!  Say a lie many times and it becomes truth in society - and that is exactly what they have tried to creat - an illusion!  So please look at this post as well, because Mike Pence and Rex Tillerson are honest, law abiding, and law enforcing patriots!  THIS IS OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD IN PLACE!

I had a post about 911 and it disappeared.  All my notes - gone.  So I have to create this over and maybe it will be better than the other one.  I sure get tired of corruption and TECHNOCRACY is rittled with corruption. They break laws even against humanity because they want to "force" us to get them to create a Bill Of Rights, for one thing. Don't fall for it!  A Bill of Rights is their step to a ONE WORLD ORDER - NO WAY, NO HOW!!!

Video:       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7md2QzNsAe4&t=366s

Comment by the channel creator:
MrChrillemannen
MrChrillemannen4 hours ago (edited)

5/29/2018 - NOTE. The pictures on this blogpost were altered by a hacking technocrat!  I showed specific pictures which proved that the planes that hit the towers were small as commuter planes - Boeings are wider than the tower building were!  

        see this:  https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=planes+that+hit+the+WTC+&view=detail&mid=79944209309E2B09436179944209309E2B094361&FORM=VIRE 

they were commuter-size drones most likely made by Mike Pompeo's Thayer Aerospace, which he did not even mention when he was at his hearing in the Senate and nobody in the Senate consider that to be suspicious enough to deny him opportunity to be Secretary of State and ruin our country!  They asked him what he was doing at a certain time, around the date of 9/11 and he said he was working in a factory - He was CEO of his company, Thayer (which had the same name as a politician in Arizona, whose son was discharged as a police officer because he shot someone dead "by mistake"- or some other crime) - and the military explosives which caused the Towers to turn to dust - were probably obtained by John Bolton, who was undersecretary of firearms of weaponry then!  That is why they alter my blog! That is why Trump fired Rex Tillerson out of the clear blue in a freaking tweet!  See my post on Rex Tillerson, please.  Copy and share whatever you want and you do not need to refer to me. I do not care.  

Someone posted: Quote: ”I am a flight attendant for 30 years. Flew out of JFK the morning of 9/11 on TWA flight #3, we were scheduled to leave at 8:00am. I was the in-flight Service Manager (head stew). But when I got on the plane it wasn't the same tail number plane we were supposed to go on. It was a Boeing 767 but it was one of our older ones. I was the flight Service Manager and was told by mechanics that the plane we were supposed to take got an alert from bomb sniffing German shepards that morning and they had to switch planes, and take this older 767 out of the hangar. The plane was stripped bare, and I advised ramp guys that I was not going to take off or board passenger's without emergency preparedness cards in seatpockets and other items that were required safety wise. If I had not taken that delay God only knows what would have happened. Also in hindsight, why would they let flights out of JFK still take off if they already knew by this time they had a definite problem, and two rogue planes off their flightplan out of Boston!!?? That flight eventually took off out of JFK 9/11/2001 at 8:42am wheels up (looked at my watch as we do), on climb out we suddenly jolted and took a nose dive then jolted again, and began ascent again. I went up to cockpit right after they turned off seat belt sign still shaken, to enquire what had happened?? They were pale and visibly still shaken as well, and said they didn't know as soon as they were making their ascent turn towards Manhattan they near missed an aircraft flying fast out of control and crazy. They would later say during our sequester in Ohio for 4 days that we all came very close to death that day. More happened that day, during and after we landed that made no sense, and like the the Flight Attendant in this video said, followed no standard established safety protocols. I was so upset by the obvious set up I also stopped flying shortly afterwards, as I no longer felt protected by anyone or anything controlling things!! This is all true. In closing I must add. As airline personell we are required to take an emergency review class 8-5pm, once a year, required by the Federal government. At the end of this review we take mandatory emergency operations, and safety protocols, hijacking, ditching, plane configurations, operation of plane doors and all emergency equipment exams. Including a brush up in CPR certification. Now during this course they did something they have never in 30 years, ever done!! This was the last Friday in August 2001. During the hijacking part of the class, they constantly were making more of being aware of the threats of some middle eastern man named Osama Bin Laden. I was so taken back by this rather off program, and strange kind of focus they were, and kept placing on this particular middle eastern man looking at soft targets like air travel, who I had never heard of. So I asked my instructor, "why are you focusing on this one particular guy so much?? I have never seen anyone actually named like this before. Who is he exactly, and is there something specific we should know about him? " The response, "oh no just using him as a reference". Very strange, and again all trueI! I Worked for TWA until American took us over, but we were still flying under TWA plane paint white and red. I Was badly injured on the sharp descent we took flying into Dayton after being ordered to land about 10:00am or so by an F16 over our left wing. I can assure you all these incidents happened to me that fateful day. I am not saying them to agre nor disagree with the woman being interviewed. I will say that having been a flight attendant 30 years on 9/11 flying in TWA flight 3 that morning. My airplane made frightening maneuvers to avoid FLIGHT 11. We came extremely close to a horrific mid air collision on climb out. We should have never been allowed to take off at 8:40am from JFK a/p in NYC with 3 airplanes having their transponders turned OFF!!!! My proof lies on the Air traffic controllers tapes of that morning that are public record. You can clearly hear my Captain's voice both asking for permission to ascent (take off) and as we were ascending he comes in clearly to request his vector coordinates on turn. Vector meaning due east northeast, West etc... I can tell you that we came very close to being confused with flight 93 and shot down. We had a visible F16 off our left wing forcing us to immediately emergency land in Dayton Ohio. Giving us 18 minutes to do so. Asking our pilots if we had any Arab or middle eastern pax on board. I whispered to My captain no. But then told him off tape I didn't have a good feeling about that question being that the company's flight manifest was easy for the air force to come by? I later discovered this question and that F16 incident strangely coincided with the time frame of Flight 93!!. I assure Yall I wish I was making this all up!! It haunts me every September for 16 years, also I got injured standing for landing as I didnt want to make my self an easy strapped in sitting target. I never worked as a Flight service manager (#1f/a) or donned that uniform again! - End quote. Another post: Quote: ”I’m a mechanical engineer and she's speaking on her experience as a professional and what they are trained to do. Everything she's saying sounds right. I used to fly AWACS and a lot of what she's saying sounds correct."- End quote. Another person posted: Quote: ”I started working as an aircraft mechanic in Dec of 2000 with F9. On the flight crew side, I know enough about it to tell you she's correct in her statements about procedures and processes..” - End quote. A very informative post: Quote: ”I was a telephone operator in 2001 and I've examined the call routing log for those calls. All were processed by an operator (OSPS) but the terminal numbers have been redacted. This is a dead giveaway that diversion took place, most likely an observation bench in DC. When someone places a call from one calling area to another using the aid of an AT&T operator, regardless of how the call was billed, the document produced (a routing ticket) is printed with the terminal number of the operator that connected the call. (For example, ATGA0406S 14:18 would indicate Atlanta, row 4 terminal 6, supervisory at 2:18 EDT.) On the logs that I've managed to see, the terminal numbers were scratched out. Those numbers can trace the call back to the exact building and seat number, and eventually back to the operator that assisted on the call. When I saw it was scratched out, that was a dead giveaway. Why would that information need to be kept secret? The averageJoe can't do anything with it.”- End quote.   Another post: Quote: ”There's a lot of folks saying, 'Where's all those people if this...?" And "What if that...?" Criticizing and judging her. She's the PROFESSIONAL here, not you. And if you truly and sincerely want to know the answers. Get off of your high horses, take some personal responsibility and do your OWN research. This woman makes complete and total sense. And I can tell you: there were TIMED explosions going off the entire time we were making our way out of the S Tower. CHECK IT: in late July 2001 we had a security sweep done in BOTH buildings. We got a notice for the days our offices were to be closed (for 2-days). Guess what I found out from My research after the official report: the nephew and good friend of G.W. Bush was on the Board of Directors of the company. Now back to it, the Concourse level had 15" thick MARBLE walls that looked like they'd been through a shredder. The elevator to the lower levels had the doors blown OUTWARD. The guys who were working on SUB 3 (the WTC has four levels below the Main Concourse) said they heard a huge explosion (UNDER THEIR LEVEL - SUB 4) and that some of the guys had 3rd degree burns; a couple that I saw had skin hanging from their face and extremities. Airplane gasoline did that? It dripped from up on the 85th floor? - Please. I talked to people, who were on the ground near the WTC, who said they suddenly saw an airplane and as they followed the thing, it suddenly disappeared then reappeared and hit the building (there are some who say those were hologram projections so I thought that testimony from competent folks was fascinating - not saying that's the case, ok. It's just interesting to me). Those fires burned for WEEKS as good people volunteered to clean up and search for people! Many of those workers and firefighters came down with upper respiratory issues and cases of lung cancer, fibromas, etc. I've never had upper respiratory problems, I don't smoke, yet I developed COPD several months after breathing that dust. Yes, the building was PULVERIZED to DUST. Airplane gasoline did that? Please. Trolls, shills and arrogant dolts have a ball: I will not answer or debate anyone of that ilk regarding this comment because I WAS THERE. If you were there and you have a different perspective, we can have discourse. Peace and Blessings." - End quote. You might find the three links which are attached below quite interesting as well as informative: 1) The 2017 NIST whistleblower interview: 


Israeli "art students" blew up the Twin Towers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kg7Qt4bV0B8 // 

3) Professor Griffin's new book: https://www.amazon.com/Bush-Cheney-Ruined-America-World/dp/1566560616 Best Rggards, Christer

.........I will be returning to add more to this blog 

Meantime, remember the terror these Evil Americans brought to our country!!! 


This is what happens when a bomb goes off - not when a plane hits a high-rise!  Check out this Official video of FIRST military explosives-filled drone crash - and they DID claim to begin with that it was military explosives so President Bush could blame Secretary of State Colin Powell - who had nothing to do with all this!  The smear campaign was backfiring!  He also created a smear campaign on Colin Powell about the WOMD made by Saddam Hussein!  The US Gov- paid terrorists in Syria purchased them and they were found in 2015 and placed in a multi-ton container and sunk on a retired navy ship in an undisclosed part of the ocean!  Watch this 1 1/2 min video - it is a drone filled with explosives!  A Boeing is WIDER than the WTC bldgs were!  The passenger Boeings were flown to an undetectable area - and transponders were turned off.  Passengers were gased to death Hitler-style before the planes landed on an island using uninteruptable auto pilot.  The passengers' bodies were placed in a large utility dumpster that was waiting for them! Hitler-style!  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3shmfKOZ9g  


This was shown on an Amazon
Video on The Pentagon.
This is what happens when a high rise is bombed! An airplane would have a quick flash and that's it because that's what kerosene does on impact! NO EXPLOSION like this!
 I will Be making a post on 
"America's Book Of Secrets" series soon 4/15/2018

Fresh Kills


7:08 minutes

WTC Debris Burial
WTC 911 Demolition
Utube
Film opens. Shows many keys, cash, all tagged.  Exclusion Zone Signs. Photographs and videos prohibited “Fresh kills covers an area of 2,200 acres – 3.4 sq miles”
This is a landfill
Objects from everyday life – stuffed dolls from gift shops. Art work. Bronze sculptures. Lamp Post. Fire hydrants. Keys (over 200). Elevator signs. Found 25.  Felt like a construction site. Organized – material was all sorted.
Sought human remains as primary mission/for DNA
Agents and Detectives were at conveyor belts.
Didn’t find remains of half the people.  They returned any personal effects (i.e. credit card) Many hand guns were charred.

Former FBI Agent Chief Ted Gunderson says 9/11
Antisionisten
CIA makes mafia look like a Sunday School class
Embassy – Kenya
USS Kohl
Did you know that the WTC was put together by the FBI?
Ted Gunderson: Yes.  FBI informant was an Egyptian Muslim.
Ted Gunderson claims the informant was more credible
John Antison
Kenya investigation also
Death of 6 – 1,000 injured
Hundreds of millions $ in damage
Is not the chief suspect that bombed WTC
Ted Gunderson: also the CIA…that took years to plan. NSA was monitoring bin Laden’s calls in 1998. They all knew about it.  Commander in Chief knew (but they only refer to President Bush)
Ted Gunderson: Yes…he explains the problems with the Patriot Act (Note GW Bush claimed that it was named the AntiTerrorism Act but he wanted to change it as a favor to the Democrats – naming it the Patriot Act – and notice how the Democrats claim it is far from being patriotic! This disgusting way of poltics has to stop!)
1993 WTC bombing only killed 6
OK City bombing was next
Now, with WTC episode, “Congress imposes further harm to our privacy”
TG keeps blaming FBI
What-when-where-why and how of every patriot and every militia in US…therefore they should know about the terrorists, he concludes
NSA employs 150,000 people – they tap on virtually everyone.

911 MXL
Not for the Faint Hearted
Kounterfeet
Video shows people falling. 1985 is referenced
People looked to movies to compare it.
900 feet – more than twice the speed for an aircraft of that kind.
AA Flt 11
8:46 a.m. Flashed from canal Street to WTC – instantily killing everyone on board…burning bodies…People lived for long minutes – even called others. Swaying of building – enormous weight – enormous speed – buildings took the hit and they stood.
Plane going over statue of Liberty at 500-600 mph – “paper brought the bldgs. Down”
Flt 11 – had some passengers still buckled to their seats.  Norht Tower, the plane’s fuel went down the shafts and created a much broader fire.[1]  People were breaking windows. Others hanging on to steel columns.
James Glanz, NYT: there’s really few words to describe how terrible that must have been. Many jumped (shown)  Juliani’s reaction seemed phoney there (time ck – 13:00)
Camela Jose Verga: At one time you said this is what they are, but then it started getting worse and worse and worse...
Word came that terrorists commandeered
9:38 another plane crashed into the Pentagon, Killing everyone on board, and 126 people on the ground  (time ck – 14:00)
Then a 4th plane crashed into the hillside of PA – brought down by some of its own passengers, before it could reach its target, the Nation’s Capitol
Footage shows crash of some sort – somewhere
There are tens of thousands of planes flying at any given time
The raging fires were burning to the heat of a nuclear fire plant
The heat sored to nearly 2,000 degrees F
9:58 South Tower collapsed – “began to tip forward” and came down.  It happened in ten seconds!
Is this a reflection of the 93 Society? 
Jason Goodman interviews an expert on this topic  Crowdsource The Truth, *YouTube *Patreon *OtherPlatforms
In 1993 a 4,000 lb bomb goes off in the basement, it didn’t go down
This time they figured it out
At 10:28 a.m., 30 minutes after the South Tower fell, a TV antenna on the North Tower began to give way – 10 seconds
Chaos emphasized
(time ck—21:17)
We are made mostly of air – where did they go as part of disbelief.
Leslie Roberton, Engineer: I was totally devastated this building I designed fell. ..It was a terrible day

Ada Louise Huxtable, Architect: By 11, hundreds of thousands were covered in ashes and dust.
All day, emergency rooms braced themselves for heavy onslaught of survivors that never came.
5:20 p.m., the WTC 7 collapses due to “oil fire within”
Sad poetic justice. Only bldgs. That collapsed were the ones carrying the WTC label.







[1] Yet the time each one fell was identical to when they were hit by the planes.



The Firing Line with William Buckley, Jr.
Note, these notes are a bit rough….I don’t have time to polish them right now - This is not really about WTC directly, yet WTC false flag bombing by Americans greatly affected the economy 

Does America need more tyrants? 
Warren Steibal Production:  Firing Line
Hoover Institution
Stanford Univ

Sponsored by:
Warren Steibal Production
SC Educational TV (SCETV)
Major Funding:
Robert M. Hearin Foundation
Entergy Corporation
South Central Bell
Mobile Telecommunication Technologies Corp
Trustmark National Bank
Deposit Guaranty National Bank
Home Federal Savings & Loan Assoc of Meridian
The Freedom Forum
Sunburst Bank
Hancock Bank
Robert Dunlap
Albert L. Meena
DEBATE
Michael Kinsley[1], moderator: We are at Univ of Mississippi.  Does America need more tyrants
NAFTA – big trade issue of the moment
Resolved:  US Industry does not need protection
William Buckley, Jr. – Captain
          Spends a lot of time in Switzerland and high seas
Jack Kemp – Secretary of HUD
          “the conscience of the Bush Admin”
Henry Kissenger

Dick Army – PhD in Economics (probably the other Captain of Team 2)
Dick Gephart, Congressman. Majority leader of House of Reps. Tries to get in the way of Domestic Commerce…His style of foreign program is similar to his trade approach..find a group of aggrieved Americans and tell them you have a program to solve their problems, and pretend that other Americans don’t have to pay for it. Gephart’s essay published in 1988, when he was editor of the NYT: Are we losing jobs, are we exporting our capital, are we losing our sovereignty, which are the best approaches to our problem deficits…
our Free Trade Plan is quite simple: every citizen shall have the right to buy whatever he wants, whatever he chooses, at his own good pleasure without restriction or discouragement from the State.
          Purpose is in question:  Was it devised to crush and conquer US or to
                                                  To nourish and enrich our country?
                                                  [When the Facts Change, I change my mind[2] - inserted by me]

Winston Churchill, 1908: Not a syllable of it would I for one wish it to alter since the postulate of economics do not change simply because Prof Thoreau decides to write another book[3]
We criticize the practices of other countries like Japan, and we have just cause to do so, but so do other countries have just causes to criticize our own practices…Fair Trade for us means the xxx James xxxvard. The Jamaicans are not allowed to sell 50 gallons of icecream per year. Mexico may sell 35,292 bras to US per year, Poland may ship 350 tons of alloy tools every year, and Haiti sell us exactly 730 tons of sugar…the US recently levied an import sur-tax on rice in Tailand because of the rice subsidy we spotted…simultaneously the US was subsidizing rice 100 times larger to American rice growers.
Ten years ago, we limited Japanese imports…
          Voter discontent
“They forgot every set of circumstances”, according to WC (http://homepage.eircom.net/~odyssey/Quotes/History/Churchill.html)....
…”so it is with the fair traders. They watch the river flowing to the sea and they wonder how long it will be before the land is parched and drained of all its water. They do not observe the fertilizing showers by which in the marvelous economy of nature, the water is restored to the land”

Jerry Brown – Former Rep of CA, presidential candidate[4]
Lester Thorough – Dean of Sloan School of Mgt of MIT
                              Book:  Head To Head
                              One of US’ leading economists, known best for “Industrial Policy”
                                Which is, “The govt should play an active role in the investment of the
                                   private economy”
James Fallows[5] – Washington Editor of the Atlantic Monthly. Best known for things about Japan and things Japanese.  He lived in Japan for several years in late 1980’s. Was chief speech writer for President Jimmy Carter. “Both of them I would prefer to forget”, says moderator (I presume quoting James Fallows)

William Buckley
Your toleration and humor will be sorely tested…


US would grow stronger if we devoted ourselves to removing restraints on trade rather than adding to their number.

RICHARD GEPHART SPEAKS

If this debate was simply about the resolution by Mr. Kinsley I would say this, “US Industry does not need protection. Except from arguments like made from Mr. William F. Buckley, and then I would take my seat. But the parameters of the debate are larger and the stakes are higher. Team Buckley will argue the Free Trade Theory rewards the consumers and can produce a growing global economy. Anything more complicated or more aggressive is simply smooth-hauling protectionism. We will argue that Free Trade Theory has been a recipe for economic decline, and that our economic policy should not just maximize consumer welfare, but also should produce a higher standard of living for all Americans. Who prevails in this debate – and in our country’s larger public discourse?[6]
-I have to stop here and resume later….I will rename the file….12/20/2015






[1] He works at CNN’s Crossfire and Import Magazine, I think
[2] Dear Quote Investigator: John Maynard Keynes was an enormously influential economist, but some of his detractors complained that the opinions he expressed tended to change over the years. Once during a high-profile government hearing a critic accused him of being inconsistent, and Keynes reportedly answered with one of the following:
When events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?
When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?
Because there are so many different versions of this rejoinder I was hoping you might determine if any of them is real. Is there any truth to this anecdote?
Quote Investigator: No direct evidence that Keynes made a comment of this type has been located by QI or other researchers. The earliest statement found by QI that fits this template was not spoken by Keynes but by another prominent individual in the same field, Paul Samuelson who was awarded the 1970 Nobel Prize in economics. He was well-known to students for creating a best-selling economics textbook.
On December 20, 1970 he was interviewed by a panel on the television program “Meet the Press.” The transcript of the show was published the next day in the “Daily Labor Report” from the Bureau of National Affairs, Washington. Austin Kiplinger of Kiplinger Publications asked Samuelson about inflation. Boldface has been added to excerpts [PSDR]:
KIPLINGER: Returning to this matter of how much inflation we can absorb effectively, you may remember that Dr. Sumner Schlicter at Harvard shocked, I guess, the American Public after World War II when he said some inflation was not only inevitable but perhaps also desirable to promote growth. My question is do you agree with that general assessment and if so, how much should we have and how much is acceptable?
DR. SAMUELSON: I do agree with it and I suffer for expressing my agreement. Different editions of my textbook have been quoted. In the first edition I said a five percent rate is tolerable. Then I worked it down to three percent and then down to two percent and the AP carried a wire “Author Should Make Up His Mind.” Well when events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
Intriguingly, in 1978 Samuelson used a version of this expression again, and this time he credited the words to Keynes. His statement was reported in the Wall Street Journal in an article by Lindley H. Clark Jr. [PSWJ]:
Paul Samuelson, the Nobel laureate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recalled that John Maynard Keynes once was challenged for altering his position on some economic issue. “When my information changes,” he remembered that Keynes had said, “I change my mind. What do you do?”
It is possible that Samuelson was consciously or unconsciously echoing a remark of Keynes when he spoke in 1970, but there is no compelling support for this because he did not credit Keynes during the television interview.
Here are some additional selected citations in chronological order.
In 1933 Keynes wrote a letter to the magazine The Economist on the topic of a gold standard for currency. Keynes stated “my recent advocacy of gold as an international standard is nothing new.” The following quotation is presented because it illustrates a situation in which Keynes did not change his mind, and he used understated humor to respond to the periodical [MKEG]:
I apologise for occupying your space. But since there are people who deem it creditable if one does not change one’s mind, I should like to get what kudos I can from not having done so on this occasion!
In 1945 an anecdote about Keynes and Churchill was published in Life magazine. Keynes was depicted as someone who was known to change his mind on economic questions [MKLF]:
Keynes is always ready to contradict not only his colleagues but also himself whenever circumstances make this seem appropriate. So far from feeling guilty about such reversals of position, he utilizes them as pretexts for rebukes to the less nimble-minded. Legend says that while conferring with Roosevelt at Quebec, Churchill sent Keynes a cable reading, “Am coming around to your point of view.” His Lordship replied, “Sorry to hear it. Have started to change my mind.”
In 1961 Paul Samuelson testified before a Congressional Committee concerned with the “Impact of Automation on Employment.” He noted that several jests are made about the field of economics, and he presented one quip that featured the supposed mutability of opinions held by Keynes [PSCH]:
One of the jokes is that if Parliament asked six economists for an opinion on any subject they always got seven answers. Two from John Maynard Keynes. I think when we economists examine the seven answers we find that the discrepancies among them are not as great as the layman thinks.
In 1970 Paul Samuelson spoke a version of the saying, and it was broadcast on television as noted earlier in this article [PSDR]. In the Wall Street Journal in 1978 Samuelson attributed a version of the remark to Keynes. This is the first citation that QI is aware of in which Keynes who died in 1946 is credited, and the details were given above [PSWJ].
In 1979 James S. Earley reviewed a volume of the “Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes” in the “Journal of Economic Literature.” Earley ascribed a version of the saying to Keynes, but he did not point to a location within the volume he was reviewing for the phrase [MKJE]:
The critical problem was to close the “Inflationary Gap” as Keynes dubbed it, but to do so with improved equity, and a positive contribution to postwar high employment. One is reminded of one of Keynes’s ripostes. When accused of often changing his mind, he retorted, “When I find new information I change my mind; What do you do?”
In June of 1983 Paul Samuelson wrote an article for the Keynes Centenary that appeared in the Economist. He presented another version of the saying that he credited to Keynes [MKSK]:
Keynes provided his own impeccable defence of being protean. “When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?”
In August of 1983 the Wall Street Journal printed another version of the saying in an article by the journalist Lindley H. Clark Jr. In 1978 Clark quoted Samuelson presenting a version of the remark and attributing it to Keynes. In 1983 Clark directly credited Keynes with a somewhat different version of the quotation [MKLC]:
When someone kidded British economist John Maynard Keynes because he had altered his views on an economic question, Lord Keynes replied: “When I’m wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?”
In 1986 an article in “The Economic Journal” about the notable economist Joan Robinson claimed that she had a favorite anecdote about Keynes that included a version of the saying. Robinson was at Cambridge with Keynes and knew him well [MKJR]:
Her favourite story about Keynes is that when someone remonstrated with him for being inconsistent, he responded: ‘When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?’
The quotation continued to mutate and propagate after 1986, and many additional citations are available. But here the presentation skips to 1999 when the saying was attributed to the powerful quotation magnet Winston Churchill in the Florida Times-Union [WCFU]:
Winston Churchill once said to a woman berating him for changing his position, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, madam?”
Next the presentation skips to 2011 and an inquisitively skeptical journalist who writes for the Wall Street Journal. Jason Zweig wondered about two quotations attributed to Keynes: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir” and “The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” He doubted that Keynes said either of them, and he contacted an expert [MKJZ]:
In an e-mail in 2003, Keynes’ most authoritative biographer, Lord Robert Skidelsky, told investment advisor William Bernstein that he believed they were “both apocryphal.” This week I asked another renowned expert on Keynes, Donald Moggridge of the University of Toronto, if he could identify the source of either of the oft-quoted remarks. “The simple answer,” Prof. Moggridge replied by e-mail, “is there is no evidence.”
In conclusion, there is some evidence that Keynes made a remark similar to the one under investigation, but this evidence is weak and problematic. Keynes died in 1946 and the first known attribution to him is dated 1978. There are so many variants of the quotation that it is not possible to select a single one. Samuelson, for example, gave more than one version over the years.
The connection to Winston Churchill is tenuous because the attribution occurred at such a late date and because Churchill’s name attracts spurious ascriptions.
Oddly, Samuelson himself might deserve credit based on the 1970 citation, but he, in effect, disclaimed credit in 1978. So the case is unresolved. Thanks for this interesting but difficult query.
(Many thanks to Eric Columbus for raising this question and motivating this exploration.)
Update history: On September 30, 2011 the 1999 citation for Winston Churchill was added.
[PSDR] 1970 December 21, Daily Labor Report, Number 246, Page X-3, Column 1 and 2, Full Text Section, [Transcript of “Meet The Press”: NBC Radio and Television Program; December 20, 1970; Interview with Professor Paul A. Samuelson], Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.: Washington, D.C., Alexandria, Virginia. (Verified using scanned images from the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Special thanks to the wonderfully helpful librarian at UA)
[PSWJ] 1978 October 13, Wall Street Journal, U.S. Monetary Troubles by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 22, New York. (ProQuest)
[MKEG] 1933 March 25, The Economist, Letter to the Editor of the Economist from J. M. Keynes dated March 20, 1933, Page 642, Column 1, London, England. (Verified on microfilm)
[MKLF] 1945 September 17, Life, Close-Up: Lord Keynes by Noel F. Busch, Start Page 118, Quote Page 122, Volume 19, Number 12, Time Inc., New York. (Google Books full view) link
[PSCH] 1961 March 20, Congressional Hearing, Eighty-Seventh Congress, First Session, House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Unemployment and the Impact of Automation of the Committee on Education and Labor, Impact of Automation on Employment: Statement of Dr. Paul A. Samuelson, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Start Page 120, Quote Page 139, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (Hathitrust) link
[MKJE] 1979 June, Journal of Economic Literature, Reviewed work: [The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume 22. Activities 1939-1945: Internal War Finance, Edited by Donald Moggridge; John Maynard Keynes], Review by James S. Earley, Start Page 539, Quote Page 540, Column 1, Volume 17, Number 2, American Economic Association. (JSTOR) link
[MKSK] 1986, The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume 5, Edited by Kate Crowley, Paper Number 305, The Keynes Centenary: Sympathy from the other Cambridge by Paul A. Samuelson, [1983 June 25, The Keynes Centenary, The Economist, Pages 19-21], Page 275, Column 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Google Books preview) link
[MKLC] 1983 August 23, Wall Street Journal, How the Fed Might Find Peace and Tranquillity: Speaking of Business by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 33, New York. (ProQuest)
[MKJR] 1986, The Economic Journal, Supplement: Conference Papers, On the Influence of Piero Sraffa on the Contributions of Joan Robinson to Economic Theory by G. C. Harcourt, Start Page 96, Quote Page 99, Footnote 3, Volume 96, Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic Society. (JSTOR) link
[WCFU] 1999 September 18, Florida Times-Union, Editorial, Term Limits: Fowler’s dilemma, Section Metro, Page B-6, Jacksonville, Florida. (NewsBank)
[MKJZ] 2011 February 11, Wall Street Journal: MarketBeat Blog, “Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?” by Jason Zweig. (Wall Street Journal website; Accessed blogs.wsj.com 2011 July 22) link

Post navigation

[3] Jeremy Bentham (/ˈbɛnθəm/; 15 February 1748 [O.S. 4 February 1747][1] – 6 June 1832) was a British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer. He is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism.
Bentham defined as the "fundamental axiom" of his philosophy the principle that "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong".[2][3] He became a leading theorist in Anglo-American philosophy of law, and a political radical whose ideas influenced the development of welfarism. He advocated individual and economic freedom, the separation of church and state, freedom of expression, equal rights for women, the right to divorce, and the decriminalising of homosexual acts.[4] He called for the abolition of slavery, the abolition of the death penalty, and the abolition of physical punishment, including that of children.[5] He has also become known in recent years as an early advocate of animal rights.[6] Though strongly in favour of the extension of individual legal rights, he opposed the idea of natural law and natural rights, calling them "nonsense upon stilts".[7]
Bentham's students included his secretary and collaborator James Mill, the latter's son, John Stuart Mill, the legal philosopher John Austin, as well as Robert Owen, one of the founders of utopian socialism.
On his death in 1832, Bentham left instructions for his body to be first dissected, and then to be permanently preserved as an "auto-icon" (or self-image), which would be his memorial. This was done, and the auto-icon is now on public display at University College London. Because of his arguments in favour of the general availability of education, he has been described as the "spiritual founder" of UCL, although he played only a limited direct part in its foundation.[8]

[4] (had an affair with Linda Ronstadt)
[5] I wonder if that is where SNL got the character “Brian Fellows”
[6] My opinion, he obviously wants to promote discourse by saying this #OperationChaos – certainly consistent with the Democratic Party 


[1] Dear Quote Investigator: John Maynard Keynes was an enormously influential economist, but some of his detractors complained that the opinions he expressed tended to change over the years. Once during a high-profile government hearing a critic accused him of being inconsistent, and Keynes reportedly answered with one of the following:
When events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?
When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?
Because there are so many different versions of this rejoinder I was hoping you might determine if any of them is real. Is there any truth to this anecdote?
Quote Investigator: No direct evidence that Keynes made a comment of this type has been located by QI or other researchers. The earliest statement found by QI that fits this template was not spoken by Keynes but by another prominent individual in the same field, Paul Samuelson who was awarded the 1970 Nobel Prize in economics. He was well-known to students for creating a best-selling economics textbook.
On December 20, 1970 he was interviewed by a panel on the television program “Meet the Press.” The transcript of the show was published the next day in the “Daily Labor Report” from the Bureau of National Affairs, Washington. Austin Kiplinger of Kiplinger Publications asked Samuelson about inflation. Boldface has been added to excerpts [PSDR]:
KIPLINGER: Returning to this matter of how much inflation we can absorb effectively, you may remember that Dr. Sumner Schlicter at Harvard shocked, I guess, the American Public after World War II when he said some inflation was not only inevitable but perhaps also desirable to promote growth. My question is do you agree with that general assessment and if so, how much should we have and how much is acceptable?
DR. SAMUELSON: I do agree with it and I suffer for expressing my agreement. Different editions of my textbook have been quoted. In the first edition I said a five percent rate is tolerable. Then I worked it down to three percent and then down to two percent and the AP carried a wire “Author Should Make Up His Mind.” Well when events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
Intriguingly, in 1978 Samuelson used a version of this expression again, and this time he credited the words to Keynes. His statement was reported in the Wall Street Journal in an article by Lindley H. Clark Jr. [PSWJ]:
Paul Samuelson, the Nobel laureate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recalled that John Maynard Keynes once was challenged for altering his position on some economic issue. “When my information changes,” he remembered that Keynes had said, “I change my mind. What do you do?”
It is possible that Samuelson was consciously or unconsciously echoing a remark of Keynes when he spoke in 1970, but there is no compelling support for this because he did not credit Keynes during the television interview.
Here are some additional selected citations in chronological order.
In 1933 Keynes wrote a letter to the magazine The Economist on the topic of a gold standard for currency. Keynes stated “my recent advocacy of gold as an international standard is nothing new.” The following quotation is presented because it illustrates a situation in which Keynes did not change his mind, and he used understated humor to respond to the periodical [MKEG]:
I apologise for occupying your space. But since there are people who deem it creditable if one does not change one’s mind, I should like to get what kudos I can from not having done so on this occasion!
In 1945 an anecdote about Keynes and Churchill was published in Life magazine. Keynes was depicted as someone who was known to change his mind on economic questions [MKLF]:
Keynes is always ready to contradict not only his colleagues but also himself whenever circumstances make this seem appropriate. So far from feeling guilty about such reversals of position, he utilizes them as pretexts for rebukes to the less nimble-minded. Legend says that while conferring with Roosevelt at Quebec, Churchill sent Keynes a cable reading, “Am coming around to your point of view.” His Lordship replied, “Sorry to hear it. Have started to change my mind.”
In 1961 Paul Samuelson testified before a Congressional Committee concerned with the “Impact of Automation on Employment.” He noted that several jests are made about the field of economics, and he presented one quip that featured the supposed mutability of opinions held by Keynes [PSCH]:
One of the jokes is that if Parliament asked six economists for an opinion on any subject they always got seven answers. Two from John Maynard Keynes. I think when we economists examine the seven answers we find that the discrepancies among them are not as great as the layman thinks.
In 1970 Paul Samuelson spoke a version of the saying, and it was broadcast on television as noted earlier in this article [PSDR]. In the Wall Street Journal in 1978 Samuelson attributed a version of the remark to Keynes. This is the first citation that QI is aware of in which Keynes who died in 1946 is credited, and the details were given above [PSWJ].
In 1979 James S. Earley reviewed a volume of the “Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes” in the “Journal of Economic Literature.” Earley ascribed a version of the saying to Keynes, but he did not point to a location within the volume he was reviewing for the phrase [MKJE]:
The critical problem was to close the “Inflationary Gap” as Keynes dubbed it, but to do so with improved equity, and a positive contribution to postwar high employment. One is reminded of one of Keynes’s ripostes. When accused of often changing his mind, he retorted, “When I find new information I change my mind; What do you do?”
In June of 1983 Paul Samuelson wrote an article for the Keynes Centenary that appeared in the Economist. He presented another version of the saying that he credited to Keynes [MKSK]:
Keynes provided his own impeccable defence of being protean. “When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?”
In August of 1983 the Wall Street Journal printed another version of the saying in an article by the journalist Lindley H. Clark Jr. In 1978 Clark quoted Samuelson presenting a version of the remark and attributing it to Keynes. In 1983 Clark directly credited Keynes with a somewhat different version of the quotation [MKLC]:
When someone kidded British economist John Maynard Keynes because he had altered his views on an economic question, Lord Keynes replied: “When I’m wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?”
In 1986 an article in “The Economic Journal” about the notable economist Joan Robinson claimed that she had a favorite anecdote about Keynes that included a version of the saying. Robinson was at Cambridge with Keynes and knew him well [MKJR]:
Her favourite story about Keynes is that when someone remonstrated with him for being inconsistent, he responded: ‘When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?’
The quotation continued to mutate and propagate after 1986, and many additional citations are available. But here the presentation skips to 1999 when the saying was attributed to the powerful quotation magnet Winston Churchill in the Florida Times-Union [WCFU]:
Winston Churchill once said to a woman berating him for changing his position, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, madam?”
Next the presentation skips to 2011 and an inquisitively skeptical journalist who writes for the Wall Street Journal. Jason Zweig wondered about two quotations attributed to Keynes: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir” and “The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” He doubted that Keynes said either of them, and he contacted an expert [MKJZ]:
In an e-mail in 2003, Keynes’ most authoritative biographer, Lord Robert Skidelsky, told investment advisor William Bernstein that he believed they were “both apocryphal.” This week I asked another renowned expert on Keynes, Donald Moggridge of the University of Toronto, if he could identify the source of either of the oft-quoted remarks. “The simple answer,” Prof. Moggridge replied by e-mail, “is there is no evidence.”
In conclusion, there is some evidence that Keynes made a remark similar to the one under investigation, but this evidence is weak and problematic. Keynes died in 1946 and the first known attribution to him is dated 1978. There are so many variants of the quotation that it is not possible to select a single one. Samuelson, for example, gave more than one version over the years.
The connection to Winston Churchill is tenuous because the attribution occurred at such a late date and because Churchill’s name attracts spurious ascriptions.
Oddly, Samuelson himself might deserve credit based on the 1970 citation, but he, in effect, disclaimed credit in 1978. So the case is unresolved. Thanks for this interesting but difficult query.
(Many thanks to Eric Columbus for raising this question and motivating this exploration.)
Update history: On September 30, 2011 the 1999 citation for Winston Churchill was added.
[PSDR] 1970 December 21, Daily Labor Report, Number 246, Page X-3, Column 1 and 2, Full Text Section, [Transcript of “Meet The Press”: NBC Radio and Television Program; December 20, 1970; Interview with Professor Paul A. Samuelson], Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.: Washington, D.C., Alexandria, Virginia. (Verified using scanned images from the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Special thanks to the wonderfully helpful librarian at UA)
[PSWJ] 1978 October 13, Wall Street Journal, U.S. Monetary Troubles by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 22, New York. (ProQuest)
[MKEG] 1933 March 25, The Economist, Letter to the Editor of the Economist from J. M. Keynes dated March 20, 1933, Page 642, Column 1, London, England. (Verified on microfilm)
[MKLF] 1945 September 17, Life, Close-Up: Lord Keynes by Noel F. Busch, Start Page 118, Quote Page 122, Volume 19, Number 12, Time Inc., New York. (Google Books full view) link
[PSCH] 1961 March 20, Congressional Hearing, Eighty-Seventh Congress, First Session, House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Unemployment and the Impact of Automation of the Committee on Education and Labor, Impact of Automation on Employment: Statement of Dr. Paul A. Samuelson, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Start Page 120, Quote Page 139, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (Hathitrust) link
[MKJE] 1979 June, Journal of Economic Literature, Reviewed work: [The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume 22. Activities 1939-1945: Internal War Finance, Edited by Donald Moggridge; John Maynard Keynes], Review by James S. Earley, Start Page 539, Quote Page 540, Column 1, Volume 17, Number 2, American Economic Association. (JSTOR) link
[MKSK] 1986, The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume 5, Edited by Kate Crowley, Paper Number 305, The Keynes Centenary: Sympathy from the other Cambridge by Paul A. Samuelson, [1983 June 25, The Keynes Centenary, The Economist, Pages 19-21], Page 275, Column 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Google Books preview) link
[MKLC] 1983 August 23, Wall Street Journal, How the Fed Might Find Peace and Tranquillity: Speaking of Business by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 33, New York. (ProQuest)
[MKJR] 1986, The Economic Journal, Supplement: Conference Papers, On the Influence of Piero Sraffa on the Contributions of Joan Robinson to Economic Theory by G. C. Harcourt, Start Page 96, Quote Page 99, Footnote 3, Volume 96, Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic Society. (JSTOR) link
[WCFU] 1999 September 18, Florida Times-Union, Editorial, Term Limits: Fowler’s dilemma, Section Metro, Page B-6, Jacksonville, Florida. (NewsBank)
[MKJZ] 2011 February 11, Wall Street Journal: MarketBeat Blog, “Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?” by Jason Zweig. (Wall Street Journal website; Accessed blogs.wsj.com 2011 July 22) link

Post navigation

[1] Jeremy Bentham (/ˈbɛnθəm/; 15 February 1748 [O.S. 4 February 1747][1] – 6 June 1832) was a British philosopher, jurist, and social reformer. He is regarded as the founder of modern utilitarianism.
Bentham defined as the "fundamental axiom" of his philosophy the principle that "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong".[2][3] He became a leading theorist in Anglo-American philosophy of law, and a political radical whose ideas influenced the development of welfarism. He advocated individual and economic freedom, the separation of church and state, freedom of expression, equal rights for women, the right to divorce, and the decriminalising of homosexual acts.[4] He called for the abolition of slavery, the abolition of the death penalty, and the abolition of physical punishment, including that of children.[5] He has also become known in recent years as an early advocate of animal rights.[6] Though strongly in favour of the extension of individual legal rights, he opposed the idea of natural law and natural rights, calling them "nonsense upon stilts".[7]
Bentham's students included his secretary and collaborator James Mill, the latter's son, John Stuart Mill, the legal philosopher John Austin, as well as Robert Owen, one of the founders of utopian socialism.
On his death in 1832, Bentham left instructions for his body to be first dissected, and then to be permanently preserved as an "auto-icon" (or self-image), which would be his memorial. This was done, and the auto-icon is now on public display at University College London. Because of his arguments in favour of the general availability of education, he has been described as the "spiritual founder" of UCL, although he played only a limited direct part in its foundation.[8]

_______________________
“They forgot every set of circumstances”, according to WC (http://homepage.eircom.net/~odyssey/Quotes/History/Churchill.html)....
…”so it is with the fair traders. They watch the river flowing to the sea and they wonder how long it will be before the land is parched and drained of all its water. They do not observe the fertilizing showers by which in the marvelous economy of nature, the water is restored to the land”

Jerry Brown – Former Rep of CA, presidential candidate[1]
Lester Thorough – Dean of Sloan School of Mgt of MIT
                              Book:  Head To Head
                              One of US’ leading economists, known best for “Industrial Policy”
                                Which is, “The govt should play an active role in the investment of the
                                   private economy”
James Fallows[2] – Washington Editor of the Atlantic Monthly. Best known for things about Japan and things Japanese.  He lived in Japan for several years in late 1980’s. Was chief speech writer for President Jimmy Carter. “Both of them I would prefer to forget”, says moderator (I presume quoting James Fallows)

William Buckley
Your toleration and humor will be sorely tested…


US would grow stronger if we devoted ourselves to removing restraints on trade rather than adding to their number.

RICHARD GEPHART SPEAKS

If this debate was simply about the resolution by Mr. Kinsley I would say this, “US Industry does not need protection. Except from arguments like made from Mr. William F. Buckley, and then I would take my seat. But the parameters of the debate are larger and the stakes are higher. Team Buckley will argue the Free Trade Theory rewards the consumers and can produce a growing global economy. Anything more complicated or more aggressive is simply smooth-hauling protectionism. We will argue that Free Trade Theory has been a recipe for economic decline, and that our economic policy should not just maximize consumer welfare, but also should produce a higher standard of living for all Americans. Who prevails in this debate – and in our country’s larger public discourse?[3]
-I have to stop here and resume later….I will rename the file….12/20/2015





[1] (had an affair with Linda Ronstadt)
[2] I wonder if that is where SNL got the character “Brian Fellows”
[3] My opinion, he obviously wants to promote discourse by saying this #OperationChaos – certainly consistent with the Democratic Party 

---------------------------------------


9/11/01
The Exploding Van with a Mural of..
Federal Jack Tube 6

King St, NYC
NYPD radio transmission
“Mural Van” – van has a mural of a plane hitting the WTC
Warehouse used by the Mossad (film refers to them as a Jewish Terrorist Front, yet they are like the CIA of US) 
Urban  Ving Ystem  Incorpor
  TE
FBI Report:  5 Dancing Israelis – detained as suspects. Heavily redacted documents.
Nightmare of 93 bombing
Their names:
Sivan Kurzberg
Paul Kurzberg
Yaron Shmuel

Oded Eliner
Omer Marmari

References to Benjamin Netanyahu…”They obviously proved they were witnessing a terrorist attack”

 ---------------
Collapse
Michael Ruppert [2009] Documentary on Utube
Note:  These notes are not complete

Earlier this year, while doing research for a screenplay about CIA involvement in drug smuggling during the 1980’s, we arranged for
Listen, this isn’t A PLAN that makes any sense to anybody but God. I learned that a long time ago.
I was born into a family deeply connected to the US Intelligence Community.  My mother had been a crypt analyst at the Army Securiy Agency and NSA in WWII. Her work product went to President Roosevelt and to Secretary of War, Cordell Hull. My father was an Air Force aviator who went to work for Martin Marietta on contracts for the CIA and Air Force. Mainly the TIten 3C which put out the CIA spy satellites. At age 19, when I was interning for LAPD, I was pulled into the chief’s office because 

somebody discovered I had a Q Clearance. 

            (This is another reason why I think QAnon is a CIA Psy Op!) 8/21/2018 note: refer to my blog post on QAnon

www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/QAnon.html

I can't make this link work so you can tap on it now. I'll be back.

I didn’t know anything about it. I went home and asked Dad, and he said, “Yeah, I know – that’s because your my son. They have to do that because I might need my briefcase open. But a Q was a secret compartmentalized clearance above Top Secret.  I went through UCLA as a Republican who didn’t like anything about the War in Viet Nam – didn’t like anything about govt. I had a naïve belief that you get inside the govt and change it from the inside. I became a policeman. Worked in South Central Los Angeles and when the CIA tried unofficially to recruit me during an operation when they were smuggling drugs into the country in 1976 and 1977. And I wouldn’t get involved with that. You know, gee, this must be an isolated incident of corruption. This must be something that everybody is gonna want to correct right away. And of course, that was a mistake. Basically my life disintegrated because I was betrayed by a woman who worked for CIA, who was my fiancé, and when I decided to get invoved with drugs, she disappeared and people started shooting at me. And then it was a matter of saving my life.  And the tools which I acquired to save my life then, which were writing letters to Congress, putting on the record, trying to get newspaper stories written. Those were writer’s skills, but it was also a part of learning how things worked. I was a mapmaker, a cartographer.  Going out to try to figure out how the map of the world really worked, as opposed to the way were told it worked. And the map that we have made has proved so startingly accurate were 10 years – whether they had to do with gold prices or geo political development or economic events. The only thing that amazes me is the speed at which things are falling apart. Time: 4:48 of 1:20:45
Typed notes from handwritten notes taken on the bus:
We soon learned Ruppert had little interest in talking about his drug smuggling.He hadother interests on his mind.


Revolution – Collapse
© March 2009[1]
Ruppert is smoking.  “Listen, this isn’t a plan that makes any sense to anybody but God. I learned that a long time ago.
 <to be finished>




[1] After Obama won election for second time, something to consider. A previous copywrite may have existed and it was modified, thus requiring a new copywrite.  This film may have circulated to help Obama win election.

+++++++++++++++===========
“US cameraman has proof
9/11 was a lie” (9:59 min)
Kurt Sonnenfeld
Kurt Sonnonfeld
Note, I did a little research on his background, just using Google.  He is fleeing from authorities.  On murder charges for killing his first wife.  Lives in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Claims 9/11 is a lie.
Marcelo Cena – a supporter
2d wife is Paula Sonnenfeld

Kurt Sonnenfeld Interview 9-11 Ten Years Later
Conspiracy Scope, Utube
He worked for mainly FEMA. He’d been in several installations of govt
He says News reported a small plane hit the WTC
Video cameras were prohibited – only authorized cameras at the Crime Scene
Sonnenfeld violated law, took footage
Day 1 – “they began destroying evidence”
He uses the word “sanitized”
Images of dead bodies
He says: “paper survived”

Financial Center/Govt Center- Bldg No. 6 – US Customs/militarized
Bldg 7: FBI, Secret Service,
CIA – “used to spy on UN” and WTC as well
--he emphasizes a “free fall” on WTC 7.  Note, this is ten years later, so he’s just copy catting others
--criticizes 9/11 Commission Report to build credibility on himself

Kurt Sonnenfeld
9/11 Ground Zero Footage (Part 1 of 2)
Shows officer looking at documents. Clear day, so it’s strange. Sitting in front of a private car. Sacramento US AIR security in a warehouse of some sort.  Many members.  The volume is horrible, so he is obviously concealing. Civilian talking about an experience yet audio is obviously deliberately scrambled.  My opinion. Man calls the officers together to advise them/briefing. 
“It’s gonna be a process, as you all know…We got 45 minutes before we start loading up. 
Dir of FEMA:  My prayers are with you.  Toilet paper. Equipmnet. Anything you need…Thank you (Apparently instructions were already issued) and he gave no opportunity for questions.
Time in – 8:24
Handmade sign says:
FDNY
Brothers in Battle
CATF- 7 “Sacramento”
NCNCPS         CLP     FALLEN
BROTHERS IN BATTLE
FDNY   7   NYPD
EGH    PTB     FTR     PFB
STAY SAFE

More dialogue among security
Refer to FEMA
Dogs lying on floor – waiting, it appears. Shows rubble at scene – workers – clean up – searchers – still hotspots they monitor. Personal affects on ground. Nothing specific can be identified on film.  Body found, bagged.  Flag is displayed.  One firefighter wearing flag on his hat.  Large Noise.
Audio is no so clean I’m suspicious.
”We need a bucket line”…
“We got plenty of guys on this line”
More dialogue on same work. All wearing gloves at Ground Zero.  Get praises from a crew leader.  Machinery sounds.  Footage of crews – I see no detectives, investigators (17:52)
One man wearing a face mask – the other workers are not, despite smoke, dust.  Another man has facemask yet shows 2 not wearing it (dropped chests)  Much smoke in sections. I see one man wearing a face mask – other workers not, despite the smoke, dust. Another man has a facemask yet shows 2 not wearing it, (dropped to their chests) Much smoke in sections.  I see one man coughing – no face mask.  More machinery and buckets.  Woman’s bra on steel seen, draped on the steel.  Men are being lifted up high by a crane.  Worker eating an apple – seems strange in contaminated area. 
”We need shovels!” (time ck – 26:11)
So many men without face masks! Lots of smoke in the background. Buckets are half full with dust – as they carry them to somewhere.  Welder on a crane – breaking steel apparently.  NYC FD badge shown on a man. One man with a professional mask on.  It’s green.  Heavy duty with side attachments.  Man w/ FDNY jacket.  One bldg./highrise shown.  Still standing yet a corner is “ripped up”  Possibly a plane nicked it?
Shows govt van coming in warehouse.  (time ck – 32:21)  Actually, several.  A caravan.
President GW Bush greets them.  Here, Sonnenfeld has a hidden camera obviously[1] President Bush gets up close to all workers.  Shakes hands. 
President Bush: “You ready to roll, --?”, further discussion takes place.  Clear view with camera. Photos/flashing many times. Picture of President Bush with a female FEMA worker in a working suite.  Film stopped (time ck – 37:51) possibly internet connection problem. Will not continue
---continues/resumes
More video of President Bush shaking hands – via secret video, including video of Secret Service
President Bush continues:  …shocked at the size of the devestation. It’s hard to describe what it’s like to see the naval steel, broken glass, twisting silhouetted with smoke. I said this was the first Act of War on America in the 21st Century and I was right. Particularly seeing the scene. However, there’s a lot of good. Start with the guests. They come all the way over from CA to help brothers and sisters in need.  That’s a simple—of the country—coming together. I was also struck by how angry many of the workers were in spite of the fact they worked to exhaustion. Yeah, they are angry.  They are angry at the people who destroyed life.  They are angry at the people who caused the devestation.  And as I said, I heard their anger and America has felt the same way. My response will be one that is justified.  I am satisfied that America had rallied during this terrible tragedy.  I’m satisfied that the compassion of the nation has surfaced. I’m satisfied that in any community, we ask for help, we find.  I’m also satisfied that the 4,000 FBI agents working tirelessly to get all the evidence that can be gathered to find those who may still be in our country – if they are here. I’m satisfied that our planning for possible future actions is going the course.  Most of all, I’m satisfied and pleased to be in America. This is a proud moment to our country over this terrible devestation.  The greatest of America shines forth. I’m here the best as I possibly can to thank people who are helping here and to give comfort to those – a lot of the fire fighters who saw. Had tears in their eyes because they lost loved ones.  Brothers are missing.  It’s a sad moment. The least I can do is to give them a hug.  I’m gathering all the possible evidence. (time ck—43:34)
Secret camera still going obviously, due to position/angle
FEMA Urban Rescue & Response Team showing
President Bush poses with rescuers
Connecticut team claims they represent all 6 New England States – very strange
President Bush goes on to Massachusetts and Maine fire departments. Shaking all their hands.  Jokes with them.  
Grand applause (time ck—56:53)
A woman who appeared like Hillary Clinton walks in front of the camera
President Bush takes more photos and greets workers and dogs
Pause – internet problem
Time ck—59:06…resume later




[1] What if he had a gun, and he was so close! Is this staged? 

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hypothesis
Dr. Steve Jones at Brigham Young University
A film by Brett Smith
On 9/11 Investigation
Notes

Steve Jones: This is the electron microscope. This is the EDAX,which allows us to look at chemical elements. My name is Dr. Steven E. Jones. I decided early on that I’d rather stick with science and the facts. And that’s what I do, that’s what I’ve done all my life. I have worked in other areas, like fusion, where it takes years and years to accumulate evidence to prove your point. When we say “scientific proof”, that’s hard to come by in science, but I think we’re very close to it. Other than 9/11, there have been no high-rise steel framed buildings anywhere – ever – except that one day, that have fallen due to fire. And on that day, therefore, I challenge the official story that fire alone is the central cause. I appreciate it when people react and they say, “Well, scientifically how about somebody else’s explanation for free-fall speed?”
Text on video: shows article from newspaper, titled: BYU prof on 9/11: It wasn’t just planes
But, if you just say, “You’re a nutty heretic!” Then, I say, “Well…no, I’m not!”
Logic Gate Productions Presents
A Film by Brett Smith
Hy poth e sis
2005
Provo, Utah
Brigham Young University
Prof Steve Jones:  I love to teach and interact with students…(to class) As you think about it, the forces up and down are equal – third law. Ok, secondly… (now he is speaking to camera) I did have some teaching awards from BYU. Alcuin which is one of the prestigious awards for teaching. And the Brigham award as well. (to the class) I’ve taught this priniciple through the years and I’ve noticed that some students have a hard time grasping that those forces are really equal. (speaking to camera) I’ve taught for over 21 years. That’s something I really enjoy.  Here’s what I see.  Brett, what I see is that these powers that be use crisis’ to get people to do things that ordinarily, people wouldn’t do. Like 9/11. But, was it real? Just Muslim terrorists, or is there more to it? My concern about 9/11 stems from scientific research. In fact, the evidence shows very strongly that there were explosives used in the way the buildings came down. That is, the completeness of the destruction. The rapid acceleration. The summetry. All of these things argue for a controlled demolition using explosives. If you look at controlled demolition using explosives, the roof line does fall at nearly free fall speed. The trick is to use explosives to get material out of the way so then the roof line will come straight down and land on the footprint. In spring of 2005, I attended a talk by a local speaker. She said, “If you think those towers came down just because they were hit by jets, you have some major surprises ahead of you.” And about half the audience started applauding. And I was of the other half kind of wondering what in the world she was talking about. I hadn’t really given this much thought. But, in the next day or two, I sat down at my computer and started searching and I found that there was quite a lot of research that had been done. Particularly, the collapse of WTC 7. Which until that time, spring of 2005, I had not even seen the collapse of WTC 7. It’s a building that was not even hit by a jet. 
News reporter’s voice and video of collapse:  Building 7, ablaze at the moment and apparently getting ready to collapse…(people yelling)
Prof Steve Jones:  How can this be? It comes straight down, completely, and onto its footprint. Never hit by a jet!  How could this be?
News reporter: And then late afternoon, still another building collapses..7 WTC, ruined by falling debris from the twin towers.
Prof Steve Jones: It really was watching the collapse of building 7 for the first time that got me interested. You know, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that there’s something very strange. Especially when you compare with controlled demolition, if you get those side by side…Yeah, they really look very much the same.  The towers and the WTC 7, they were reduced to rubble. It’s not like a piece sloughed off, or the building came down and stopped or something. You have rubble and pulverization and there’s not much standing. So how do you explain this?  Bazant came up with this idea
On video:  What did and did not cause collapse of WTC Twin Towers in New York…Zdenek P. Bazant, Jia-Liang Le, Frank R. Greening, and David B. Benson
In his paper, he says, “There’s this upper block of floors, It remains basically intact. And it’s like this big piston, or tamper that just wipes out the floors below.” We’ve written a response and our point was, How about Newton’s third law? If you have a force down, there has to be an equal and opposite force up. That’s Newton’s Third Law, it’s one of the fundamental laws of physics, mechanics, and structural engineering.  So, if there’s a force on the building below, the building below exerts a force upward on this block, you see? So, what happens now when you have these equal forces is, sure, you get destruction. But you get destruction both ways. For instance, the North Tower. You look at that upper block and it’s being demolished. Just as you’d expect from the Third Law, I mean you get both ways but it’s weaker above. So you expect that upper block to be demolished, that’s what happens. I mean, look at it!  Does anyone look at the data? Do we just pull some idea out of the blue and say, “Well, this is how it happened?” No! We say, No! I want to see data! I want you to explain to me how your explanation fits the data. And if it doesn’t fit the data, I’m going to throw it out! I’m a scientist, that’s what I do. Not because it’s politically correct, or incorrect, I don’t care about that! It…your explanation has to fit the data. That’s what I like, DATA! And correspondence with explanations. The next thing that I started looking at was writing up a paper. Summarizing these things, providing references. Trying to put this together in a coherent scientific study.
Text on video: Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?
By Dr. Steven E. Jones
Physicist and Archaeometrist
The views in this paper are the sole responsibility of the author
This paper has undergone significant modifications following an additional set of peer reviews organized by Journal of 9/11 Studies Editor Kevin Ryan.
An earlier version is now published in a volume edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott.  9/11 and The American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out, Northhampton, MA: Interlink Publishing, 2006. It is published here by kind permission of the editors.  One of the editors (Prof Griffin) has explained…
“The Hidden History of 9-11-2001” Elsevier, 2006
Interestingly, I had a Deseret News reporter contact me right away about the paper.
Brian Mullahy, reporter, CBS  Channel 2 News: A physics professor with a controversial September 11th conspiracy theory November 10, 2005…Dr. Steven Jones thinks explosives may have been set in the trade center towers, bringing them down.
Prof Steve Jones on TV news show: They’re sticking with this one hypothesis; it’s as if they have blinders on. “It’s gotta be fire and damage..”
Brian Mullahy: The researcher raised the hypothesis of explosives, set in buildings and asked why WTC 7 came down in just seconds, hours after the attacks.
Prof Steve Jones on News show: The reaction was uh..was generally negative locally.  You know..(nervous laugh)
Text on video:  I think there’s a camera from the Gov. in hyour mail box looking at your every move! I’m glad I’m not a paranoid freek like you people. You should get a new domain for your site.
Of course, on e-mail I was called a “kook”
Text on video: Tell me Steve, do you moonbats really bark at the moon, or is that just a rumor?  If I join your group, do I have to wear a tinfoil hat? If so, can I make my own?
You know, that sort of thing.
(sigh) It’s really quite remarkable, really.
Text on video: Morons like Jones do the world of science and forensic enquiry no good at all by perpetuating flagarant mistruths and indeed…
What did they call me? Um.. Oh, all sorts of names, I probably in polite company I wouldn’t repeat them.
Text on video:  …your apparent lack of intellect. Still….at, staring at the sun—you ass.
Tucker Carlson on MSNBC: I wanna read you a quote from the Deseret Morning News, a paper in Utah, from you, I’m quoting now; November 14, 2005:
It is quite plausible that explosives were pre-planted in all three buildings and set off after the two plane crashes, which were actually a diversion tactic.  Muslims are probably not to blame for bringing down the WTC buildings after all.
That’s, I would think, pretty offensive to a lot of people listening. Do you have any evidence for that?
Dr. Steve Jones on MSNBC: Well, um..not to the Muslims I might say (laughing)…clip was cut
Dr./Prof Steve Jones to camera: When I was on the Tucker Carlson Show shortly after my paper came out, they had me staring at a camera. There was no monitor I could watch.  The staff had asked me what I’d like to show, and I said, “I want you to show the fall of building 7.”
Prof Jones on MSNBC: I would like to do a little experiment with you, Tucker, if I could. I sent out a video clip of the collapse of Building 7.  Because most people haven’t actually seen that one and that’s the crux of the argument that I’m presenting.
Tucker: Ok, well, sum up very quickly the argument for us.
Prof Jones to camera: And I fully expected they would.  They didn’t say they wouldn’t. Until the show..
Prof Jones to MSNBC: Now, do you..I can’t see what you’re seeing so…Are you rolling that?
Tucker: No, we just see the buiding.
Prof Jones to camera:  I kept talking about building 7 and finally I asked, “Mr. Carlson, are you going to show the collapse of Building 7?” He said, “No”
Prof Jones to MSNBC: I’m not going to let you off the hook, I really want to do this experiment…
Tucker: We don’t have a lot of time for experiments, uh, professor..Just give us one thing to hold on to! How? Uh..You make these claims, or appear to make these claims, do you have any evidence at all there were bombs in the building?!
Prof Steve Jones to MSNBC: Sure. Let’s start with the collapse of Building 7. Can you roll the video clip I sent to you?
Tucker: Ok, I’m not sure if we can, but to specify…
Prof Jones to camera:  maybe there’s some kind of a code, you just don’t show the collapse of Building 7, I don’t know what it is..
Prof Jones to MSNBC: And if you look at the collapse you see, what I’ve studied is the fall time, the symmetry, the fact that it first dips in the middle – that’s the “kink” which is very characteristic of controlled demolition.
Tucker: Professor, I am sorry that we are out of time, and I’m not sure that..
Prof Jones to MSNBC:  Whoa! Uh, one other thing I want to mention about..
Tucker: Ok, if you could hit it uh,..just really quick…
Prof Jones to camera:  You know, you have to go with science, I figure.  And science tells us that buildings don’t just collapse onto their footprint at free fall speed, unless you get the material out of the way.
Bonnie Falkner:  I’ve been speaking with Dr. Steven Jones, author of the scientific paper, “Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Collapse?”
Prof Steve Jones:  This society is mesmerized by this myth, this official story of 9/11 being due to the Muslims. Everyone knows that you can’t challenge this myth. If you do, you’re a conspiracy kook. Well, I’m sorry, good science cuts through all that nonsense. It doesn’t care. When I analyze these samples of previously molten metal, it doesn’t care whether I’m conservative or liberal, Republican, Democrat, Green – it doesn’t care. It’s just an experiment that’s done. It’s objective. To have people just say, “ I don’t want to see the data, I don’t want you to challenge the official story” which EVERYONE knows, you know. That is just so contrary to science, to logic, to reason, to humanity!
Brett: How do you respond to people that might say, “This is just so far-fetched it can’t possibly be true”?
Prof Steve Jones: See again, that argument is very general. “Far-fetched” I’m giving solid, concrete evidence. This is state-of-the-art equipment here, you know. If you can give me an argument why… Is the scanning electron microscope..is that far-fetched? No. Is EDS far-fetched? It’s used worldwide. No, that’s not far-fetched. So what’s far-fetched? You know, what? Tell me. Is THIS far-fetched to make comparisons between residues from thermite and residues found in the WTC? No, that’s just science. 
Utah Valley College
Academic Ethics Seminar 2006
Prof Steve Jones:  The goal tonight I have in mind is to preserve constitutional law in the United States. Now I love America and I love the constitution. I maintain that we are engaged in a struggle for liberty and truth right now.  Someone – my exemplar…actually said, “The truth shall make you [audience] “free” Right.So, let’s see if we can get some truth going, shall we? Here we go.
Text on video:  The WTC towers were solidly constructed…47 steel core columns and 240 perimeter steel perimeter beams.  287 steel-columns total.  Flammable office materials were not piled up next to the steel columns.  Steel-frame Huge core Enormous Heat Sinkl
Prof Steve Jones:  Look at the size of these columns.Huge, interconnected… I had an email from a mechanical engineer who read my paper and agrees with me and sent me this photo of a stove. Anyway, we burn, ok, organic material..we don’t expect the stove to collapse. It can stand. Alright. [audience laughing] And she got a laugh, too.  Then she says, “So far, I’ve not been called to the dean’s office or the chair’s office for covering this material.”
Text on video:  Titled “Mechanical Engineer at Clemson Univ” email to Steven Jones, Jan 2006.
And then she says, “So far, I’ve not been called to the dean’s office or the chair’s office for covering this material.” I cannot make that same statement. [audience laughing]  However, they were kind.  They said I could go ahead with the investigation and please give academic seminars and write papers. That’s what we’re doing tonight. Hmm? It’s ok. It’s not that BYU’s trying to shut me up. Ok? I get that a lot, it’s not the case.
David Jones (his son) to camera:  It’s definitely interesting to talk to other people. You know, especially when they find out that my dad’s the one doing a lot of this 9/11 research. That’s an easy “in” to a lot of groups that have noticed things that are kind of funny with that.  I guess my opinion from even the beginning is of course there are a lot of conspiracy theories that surround 9/11. But there are a number of things that are just plain obvious about it. Even if there was enough energy from the fires burning to weaken the columns or whatever NIST said happened the idea that it would happen in such a uniform way that it would fail all at the same time – all  the way across the building – is a little bit silly. There’s some discussion in the family about a concern that he’s doing something that will be dangerous for everyone or even just dangerous to him. As far as something – someone who was involved with this going after him- it certainly could happen but it hasn’t yet.
Prof Steve Jones:  There was uh, one fellow just very soon after my paper became available that wrote to me with ummm, threats, actually, and he said that “What’s at stake here is more important than any one man’s career.” And I’m pretty sure he was referring to my career. He also said that the pain involved in taking my paper offline would be much less than the pain that would follow if my paper was published.  He said that my research challenging the official story would endanger people.  He used the term “endangerment”
[Hinkley does govt subcontracting involving nuclear weaponse for apparently OTHER countries, i.e. “Sandia National Laboratories”.  He got a PhD in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University.  What Hinkley is good at is throwing numbers out and making them gel, apparently with the intent.  I don’t consider him a scientist.  He is more like a lyintist. His new book is a popular catch phrase used by Obama:  “Make No Mistake”]
C. Martin Hinkley: There are three groups of people that can do great harm.  Those that are intentional adversaries – people that want to destroy our country. There are groups that intentionally aid adversaries – which would be considered ‘traitors’.  There is another group, however, that has good intention – may have good intentions, but may aid an adversary.
Prof Steve Jones:  He said basically, “I can’t tell you too much but the fact is these buildings DID come down by fire.” And if that became known, then terrorists would be emboldened to use fire methods on more buildings to bring them down.”
Hinkley:  A classic example is one professor believed that a certain reaction would cause columns to fail.  So he was publishing combinations of chemicals that would do this.
Prof Steve Jones:  Now when I started talking about Thermite, he said, “You must not talk about Thermite.  Again, this could endanger people because Thermite could be used by terrorists.” And I responded – he threatened me with a lawsuit.
Hinkley:  You know, that’s…you’re way beyond what you should do. If you believe that that is really a successful way of attacking a building, we shouldn’t be giving people ideas of how to do that. That’s not an appropriate behavior.
Prof Steve Jones:  And I said, “Well..you’re going to find ways to easily purchase this stuff. Lots of information is out there. It’s not a secret at all.” So, it just again – made no sense.
Hinkley: In the industry that I work in, the nuclear weapon industry, by law you can’t talk about the details of that. If we revealed how we make nuclear weapons, then an adversary could mabe use that information against us. The other reason is if we discussed the vulnerabilities somebody may be able to find a way to defeat our system that we hadn’t thought about. And either way, society can suffer. So, we just need to be very, very careful that we don’t do something really dumb in the name of science or any other name.  We need to think about how we serve society.  And our service to society is more important than what kind of name we make for our self, for example.  He shrugs his shoulders
Prof Steve Jones:  How does it endanger people to say that explosives were the cause, if explosives were NOT the cause? Which was what he was arguing.  So, his logic just made no sense but he used that very persuasively. Fire is the official story, that’s the gist of it. And all the terrorists know that. So, if the official story is true,then the official story is what’s endangering people because they’re saying that fire can result in a collapse of a building and loss of lives. Whereas my hypothesis is that fire can’t do that. Anyway, he also then – after the threats didn’t work – he offered some bribes and he gave me two ideas for grants. 
Text on video:  some thought to how I can help you preserve your good name at BYU.  My intent is to show that I have as much concern for your well being as I have in…
And he gave me two ideas for grants that he could amost promise would be funded by Homeland Security
Text on video: happy to contact Tom Hunter and the head of Homeland Security to see if funding for BYU could be found to research options for this…
Anyway, I wasn’t interested in his bribe offers.  Both of them had to do with fires being the causative agent for the collapse of the buildings and I would have to change research directions – he made that clear – then I would get all this money. Not attracted to me at all.   [laughs comfortably]  Oh my.  He also said, “I have learned to appreciate the value of silence.  Even in the face of superior data..” So he admitted my data was pretty good after some discussion. But he said still, “I have learned to appreciate the value of silence.”
Text on video:  After several e-mail exchanges, Steven Jones refused to take his paper off of internet, and later it was published in a book.
September 7, 2006
Announcer: You’re watching ABC4 News at 5, Close to Home.
Barbara Smith:  Good evening everyone, a BYU professor is under investigation by the University For his controversial and some say flat-out crazy theories about the attacks on the WTC five years ago.
Randal Carlisle: Dr. Steven Jones is on paid administrative leave for what BYU officials call, “Increasingly inflammatory accusations”.
Prof Steve Jones:  I was uh, put on administrative leave which indeed was painful. And a little bit surprising, I must say. So, uh, I mean, there wasn’t much said to me.
Mark Koelbel Channel 2 News: Brian, why is BYU taking action against his statements?
Video shows the news show has in very large letters, “CONSPIRACY THEORY?”
Brian:  For a couple of reasons, Mark.  First, what Jones has said and second what the university suspects he has not done with his research. 
Carri Jenkins:  We are concerned about the increasing number of accusatory and speculative comments being made by Dr. Jones regarding the collapse of the WTC. The Second Involves a concern that Dr. Jones’ work on this topic has not been published in an appropriate scientific venue. 
Brian: Dr. Jones has been at the BYU department of physics (and astronomy) for 21 years.  His office is right around the corner here. He still has lab privileges, he’s still getting paid, but for now at least he can’t teach.
Prof Steve Jones: I do regret that when they did this, they did not inform me so that, you know maybe let me teach a couple more classes, or – I could never understand why I couldn’t teach. That didn’t make sense to me.  I was teaching physics. You know, what could be wrong with that? But anyway so it was and umm
Narrator/Brett:  What was your reaction when he was placed on paid leave?
David Jones:  You know, I thought that was interesting that they would take that step. But I guess that says as much about the administration at BYU as it does about him.  Evidently, there are some people that have influence over them, and there wasn’t much that he could do about it. There’s a certain religious aspect to that as well because the LDS Church basically owns and doesn’t – I guess – directly operate it – but they appoint the board of directors and those who do operate the University. 
Stopped at 24 minutes.  Resume tomorrow.
Resuming:
A lot of people tend to think of them, or any decision they make as some sort of thing directed by God. If anything, that may have caused more concern and disruption in the family than the financial aspects or other things.
Brian: To what degree does the university believe Dr. Jones may be casting an unfavorable light on the LDS Church?
Carri: It is concern whenever the professor brings the university into their personal concerns.
David Jones: I don’t think God really had anything to do with it. They’re just people, they were influenced by other people.  And no one knows exactly what those pressures were, but they made a decision and did it.
ABC Channel 4
Randal: So, he’s being investigated by the University, what exactly are they looking for?
Chris: Well, when you get to say things – when you get to be a professor, you have to back your theories up with peer-reviewed papers. So what they want to do is go back through the papers and see if there is some scientific evidence behind them. If there are others in his field that say, “Yes, indeed these are true.”
Barbara: And if not?
Chris: Ah….
Prof Steve Jones to camera: All of my papers on 9/11 have been thoroughly peer-reviewed; I wouldn’t have it any other way.  I requested a further review, this is in the media. I wanted that. Unfortunately it did not come through. I am blad that in the physics class that very day when I was informed, I had an opportunity, as I look back I just felt like telling the students some of the things of my heart and my broader interests and experience. Not 9/11, particularly, but my sense of love and concern for the students, which is unusual, except on maybe the last day of class. It turned out it was my last day of class.
October 21, 2006
News Reporter, KSL TV 5:  A Brigham Young University professor known for his theory about the 9/11 attacks is now leaving the school.
News Reporter, ABC 4: The BYU professor suspended for his beliefs about the 9/11 attacks has announced his retirement.  In a statement, Dr. Jones says,
I am electing to retire so that I can spend more time speaking and conducting research of my choosing. I appreciate the wonderful opportunity I have had to teach and serve and do research at BYU for more than 21 years.
Prof Steve Jones:  It was a very difficult decision. And I’m not even sure it was “the best decision” but the way I look at it is – the folks at the University have a certain stewardship, and I have a stewardship for pursuing truth scientifically as the primary method.  Using the scientific method – experiments and analysis.  I wanted to pursue that with regard to 9/11. I couldn’t see why I shouldn’t. Nor did anyone explain to me why I shouldn’t.
News reporter, CBS 2 News (Brian): With Dr. Jones’ resignation, BYU is dropping its review of his statements. Jones says he will continue with research of his own choosing and says, “After thorough study and reflection”, he judges the Iraq War as a war of aggression.[1]  Founded on what he calls, “deception”.
Text on video:  BYU Administrators on all levels declined to be interviewed for this film.
Because Dr. Jones is no longer at BYU, the University will not be commenting further.
-        Carri Jenkins, in an e-mail to the film maker

2007
Prof Steve Jones to camera: When I was placed on administrative leave,  of course that was very shocking. But, I decided that I really wanted to get to the bottom of this, about what happened on 9/11. I wasn’t about to give up. It occurred to me that if we looked in the WTC dust, we should be able to see some residue from the explosive.  We saw those clouds of dust formed as the buildings came down. In my first paper, I requested samples of the dust that was generated. If we could just get a sample collected on the day of 9/11 before there had been any cleanup. Then we could rule out these arguments like, “Oh, your dust is just contaminated because of the cleanup.”
Frank Delessio: On the morning of 9/11, I was heading to the Brooklyn Bridge. I proceeded to start walking on the bridge toward Manhattan. I had a camera, so I just started taking a lot of pictures.  In the photos you can see my take on the people. They were nervous, scared, they were sort of a little freaked out. When I reached the middle of the bridge, I started to hear this rumbling beneath my feet. A lot of vibration.  Then I noticed the second tower began to fall.
People screaming, “Oh my God! Oh my God!”
A big rush of soot and debris came our way. After the film and debris made a clearing, I began to finish walking towards Manhattan. When I got to about this point, people were sort of running around in the highway over here. This is the gate where I just crossed. And I’m guessing I picked up the sample somewhere between this angle from that rail to the end of the rail before the concrete starts.  Everyone was sort of hitting it and pushing it off.  Towards the end I just grabbed a handful and walked up north with it.
Brett: Did you have any sort of feeling when you picked up that dust that.. I mean, what made you do it?
Frank Delessio: What made me?  Everybody asks me that. I don’t know, I’ve been answering for history. I didn’t really have a reason why I picked up the soot. I like to call it soot instead of dust. Yeah, I really don’t have a… you know, I just scooped it and kept it.
Frank put the sample in his pocket, then went to his friend Tom’s apartment.
Tom Breidenbach: He got to my door and was standing there all covered in dust. He pulled out his hand and says, Look, this stuff’s all over the place down there. It was shocking to see him covered in the dust. I just remember looking around and thinking, “Well, let’s put it in a plastic bag.” The sample itself is pretty toxic. You can tell that it’s just got a lot of chemicals in it. It kind of seeps something that’s like a cross between a dust and a gas. It’s like a blue/green mist.  It’s just very fine, fine dust. We heard that there was this BYU physicist who was testing the dust samples, and I just assumed there were plenty of people with dust samples.
Steve Jones: it was Tom Breidenbach, I remember now, who wrote me. It would have been an e-mail, and said that he and his friend had saved this sample from the very day of 9/11. Before noon that day – you know. I was very excited.
Tom B: I debated about whether or not to volunteer the sample. I didn’t really want to even face up to what the sample might show myself.  It took maybe a couple of months before I actually sent the sample in.
Steve Jones:  This is pristine. It cannot be contaminated due to cleanup operations which began much later. Even as the dust was settling and he collected it, he held in his hand the secret of what made those buildings come down. As I looked at the dust, I noted some spheres. I was not expecting that at all, but some spheres that were just visible to the eye.  Then, I looked at those with an electron microscope.  Using elemental analysis called, “X-ray Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy” And there we found that there was a lot of iron in these spheres. I realized that a magnet then could pull these iron-rich spheres out of the dust so we could look at more of them. I remember Dr. Farrer of BYU and I looked at this sample together.
Dr. Jeffrey Farrer, Microscopist: I like to do this in fume hood. Because it’s fairly un-cluttered and also who knows what’s in the dust. Yeah, I’m not real impressed with this magnet but I mean the looks of it. It happens to be a very strong magnet. And invariably you pick up all the other junk along with the magnetic materials.  That’s why you have to visually go through it with tweezers, inspect it, and pick out – and manually pck out the particles with tweezers.
Dr. Steve Jones:  Using a magnet, we were able to find very large numbers of these spheres. Some you could see with your naked eye, more you can see with the optical microscope.  And many more you can see with the electron microscope. 


















[1] At this point in time, Bush Administration was pounded with insulting propaganda,

8/21/2018:  Much of what he deserved - and even more!

Take a look at this 5-min video:

Great, this tech crap is at it again! See APlaneTruth blog post. He explains Directed Energy Weapons caused the initial blasts and fires in.WTC 6.


Bush said Colin Powell had failed intelligence - the Kuwait War had no WOMD – which we now know was not true.  Located in Syria,  bought from Saddam Hussein.


====================================================================================================================================================
I’m gonna die
No, no, no
Yes, I’m gonna die
Save your prayers, I will ask somebody…
I’m gonna die
No, think positive…
You gotta help the others get off the floor
It’s so hot, I’m burning up…hello! Help!
Hello, Maam?
Help!
(there is a large explosion)
Film shows various articles about Osama BinLaden being the most wanted terrorist, including audio footage
On the TV shows some names and pictures under Robert Moralos (murdered Nov 9, 2000) photo and descript of his murder. On the left is “Top Ten Fugitives”  with a picture of James J. Bulger (I think a priest), and Igor Fisherman. Other pictures and names but can’t be seen.  On the right is a picture of Usama bin Laden described as “Most Wanted Terrorist”.
Click on bin Laden’s picture. Aliases: Usama Bin Muhammad Bin Ladin, Shaykh Usama Bin Laden, The Prince, The –hir, Abu Abdallah, Mujahid Shaykh, Jaji, The Director
Born: 1957 in Saudi Arabia. 6’4 to 6’6. Approx 160 pounds, Language: Arabic (probably Pashtu). Bin Laden is left-handed and walks with a cane. “Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998 bombings of the ---Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed –200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the—
The Reward for Justice Program, United State Dept of State, is offering a reward up to $25 million for information leading directly to the apprehension or conviction of –Bin Laden. An additional $2 million is being offered through a program developed and –by the Airline Pilots Association and the Air Transport Association.
“Should be considered Armed and Dangerous”
Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed is the moderator of this film. He is Prof of Contemporary History, Univ of Sussex “On the FBI’s website, He’s been indighted for the 1998 attacks, but not for 9/11” A number of journalists called up the FBI and said “Look, Why have you not connected Bin Laden to 9/11?” And they said, “I’m afraid we just don’t have the evidence”
Text On video: “I wondered, after those images from New York
Last week, whether Bin Laden was not
As astonished as myself to see them.
Always supposing he watched television.
Or listened to the radio.
Or read a newspaper.”
Robert Fisk, The Independent
And that’s just the beginning
Telemaco Presents: Zero An Investigation into 9/11
A documentary by
Giulietto Chiesa
Franco Fracassi
Francesco Trento
Thomas Torelli
Paolo Jormi Bianchi
Based on an idea by
Megachip
Gruppo Zero
With
Dario Fo
Lella Costa
Moni Ovadia
Produced by
Thomas Torelli for TPF Telemaco
Producers
Vanessa Barreiro
Fulvia D’Ottavi
Gabriella Guido
Production Designer
Giuseppe Reggio
Post-Production coordinators
Roberto Borrello
Alessandro Marinelli
Cinematographers
Christian Di Prinzio
Marco Ricchello
Original Soundtrack: Alessandro Molinari
Narrator: Tim Sparke
9/11 New York Footage by Enzo Aronica
Additional 9/11 footage: Alexandr Cicconi, Adrienne Altenhaus (New Deal)
Editor: Annalisa Schillaci
Directed by: Franco Fracassi, Francesco Trento
“On September 11, 2001, I was employed by a company called Euro Brokers and our offices were on the 84th floor of the South Tower, which was the second building to be hit that day with an airplane. I was working away at my computer and at 8:46 in the morning, there was this loud boom. “
Narrator: “At 8:46 and in 40 seconds, American Airlines Flight 11 hits the North Tower of the World Trade Center, causing extensive damage between the 93d and the 99th floors.”
Brian Clark: And the announcement of the Port Authority was, Your Attention Please. Building Two is Secure. There is no need to evacuate Building Two, and two or three minutes later, I started talking with one fella named Bobby Call. And Bobby told me he had been down about eight floors, 10 floors, heard the announcement, and had come back up. And as he was telling me this, Boom! Boom! This double explosion, and our building shook.
Narrator: At 9:03 a.m. United Airlines Flt 175 hits the South Tower.
Brian Clark: Everything just exploded in our room. Now we’re on the 84th floor. What I didn’t know at the time was that the second plane had hit six floors below us on the seventy-eight floor. We’re six floors above the impact. I heard this banging on the wall and this faint scream for help inside the 81st floor.  I looked underneath him and pulled him up…I was like superman..and I came up and he fell on me. I fell back down on my back. And this stranger landed on top of me and he gave me this big kiss. Got up, dusted ourselves off. And I said, Come on, let’s go home.
Narrator: The two towers shaked considerably the first impact. They immediately returned to their original structural position..
Text on video: Dario Fo: Nobel Prize Winner
Why? Because they were specifically designed to do this in the event of the plane crash.
Text on video:  We designed the buildings to resist
to the impact of one or more jetliners
Frank De Martini
WTC Construction Manager
Prof Steven Jones, Physisist: Towers were very solidly built. It’s like a tree, you have all these fibers in the inner tree but they are inner connected, so when the tree bends, it can handle that motion.
Narrator: Nevertheless, 56 minutes after Flight 175 strikes the South Tower, it suddenly collapses in on itself. 
 Brian Clark: We looked out the trade center, the tower we just come out of – we started to see it, boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! Move. And we stared in disbelief, as it took about eight or ten seconds for the whole tower just to go straight down and dissolve into its own ash. 
Loui Cacchioli (North Tower Survivor – New York Fire Department) His Italian is translated to English: We started to go in, and all of the sudden there were people jumping from the towers. One jumped down and hit a fireman.
Narrator: At 10:28, the North Tower also collapses.
Loui Cacchioli: I threw away my 02 max to make me lighter. I started running because when I turned around, I saw the tower coming down. Then there was all this dust that got me. When I got home, all my family was waiting for me, and I was lucky to come back home to my family. All my friends – they never came back (crying).
Text on video:  “It is hard to exaggerate the importance
Of a scientific debate over the causes
Of the collapse of the Twin Towers.”
Morgan Reynolds
US Dept of Labor
Under George W. Bush
Narrator: The official Justification…
Text on video: Seal of the Department of Commerce, United States of America
Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers
NIST NCSTAR 1
Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation
Of the World Trade Center Disaster
(various pages of the report are shown quickly)
Narrator continues: was written by the National Institute of Standards and Technology between 2002 and 2006, the studied the demolition of the WTC, reaching the conclusion that the collapse of the towers was caused by…
Text on video: According to NIST
The collapse has been caused by
The simultaneous effect of the impact of
The airplanes and the fires
Narrator continues:  by the combined effects of the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires that started by these impacts.
Frank De Martini: (Italian translated to English) We had been told by the very people who designed and built these towers, that they should have resisted the impact of MORE than one airplane. 
Text on video: The building probably could sustain
Multiple impacts of jetliners
Frank De Martini
WTC Construction Manager
Mr. Martini continues: We have to ask ourselves, did the engineers and architects imagine the airplanes could crash into towers without any fuel? Perhaps they thought that the airplanes could get there by just blowing in the breeze.
Les Jamieson, New York 9-11 truth movement: Never before or after 9/11 did steel frame towers collapse due to fire.
Mr. Martini: In 2005, there was a fierce conflagration in Madrid.  A skyscraper went up in flames. It was a huge torch that kept burning for 20 hours. Twenty consecutive hours. But in the end, the load baring structure remained intact.  The skyscraper did not fall down.
Text on video:  Windsor Tower – Madrid February 2005
Mr. Martini continues: As you can see, the building is enveloped in flames. This skyscraper was not yet complete. It was still under construction. Nevertheless, it remained standing.  Something you should note is the white colored flames. This means that there is a lot of oxygen burning. If you look at the flames coming from the two towers in New York, we can see instead, that the flames are dark red. And the smoke is black.
Prof Steven Jones: The fires that were burning in these towers
was a dark grey, a heavy, almost black smoke. This implies an oxygen starved fire.
Mr. Martini: Nevertheless, 55 minutes later, the whole tower collapses. According to the official NiST version of events, at a certain point, the steel structures of the towers gave way. It no longer had the structural strength it had at the beginning. And all of this was supposed to be because of the immense heat. And here is something difficult to explain. We know that at some point some people managed to walk down from the top of this tower. Across the point where the fire was strongest. Somehow they reached the bottom of the tower. How did they manage to do that?
Brian Clark: I don’t know, when I looked down there I didn’t see flames, I just sensed that it was the right thing to go and try and test it. We’d go as far as we could until we were stopped by flames.  And when we came to the 78th floor, the last layer was standing, but it was cracked, and there were flames licking up the side of the wall like this. It wasn’t a roaring inferno. I sense that maybe the flames were starved for oxygen right there. You know, the interior. We kept going and we got onto the 74th floor. We got down that far. Normal conditions! The lights were on, fresh air coming up from below!
Narrator: So the temperature inside the building was not particularly high. As we can see from the presence of this woman, who is standing at the precise point where the plane impacted. 
Text on video: “It is a non controversial fact
That the official explanation of the collapse
Of the WTC buildings is false”
Paul Craig Roberts
Asisstant Secretary of the US Treasury
Under Ronald Reagan
13:38 (time check) Narrator: In order to verify the way that buildings collapsed and how the heat could affect the steel, NiST Commission numerous tests – some of which were conducted by a company called Underwriters Labs. 
Les Jamieson: And Kevin Ryan – he’s the former employee of Underwriters Laboratories – who challenged the NIST report.  And went public with it the week he was fired from his job.
Paul Ryan: We did test the floor models on August 2004. And those tests disproved the primary theory behind the collapse of the buildings – was called a “pancake theory” – the floors would collapse onto eachother like a stack of pancakes and the columns were no longer supported and the columns would fall apart. Well, the floor models didn’t collapse in the test. These were in furnaces. Testing furnaces at much higher temperatures for longer periods of time.  They still didn’t collapse.  So a few months later, the government put out an update on their report. And they stated not only that the floors did not collapse, but they’d done tests on the few samples they had saved from the fire zones. And those tests proved that the temperatures were very low. The temperatures were not hot enough to soften steel. And yet, they’re coming out with a summary statement that says that’s what actually did happen – the floors did collapse and the steel did soften.
Text on video:  Floor models DID NOT collapse, steel DID NOT soften – UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES
WTC floors DID collapse, steel DID soften – NIST REPORT
UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES – floor models DID NOT COLLAPSE, steel DID NOT soften
NIST REPORT – WTC floors DID collapse, steel DID soften
Paul Ryan: so they either downplayed those results or ignored those results, and they ended up putting it all in a computer
Narrator:  Thanks to computers, NIST managed to straighten them out – and the old “pancake theory” was replaced by the “inward bowing theory” According to the Institute, the heat weakened the floors, which started to curve downwards. The external walls of the towers also curved inwards until they could no longer bare the weight of the structures of above, causing the towers to collapse. 
Paul Ryan: The final theory is almost entirely computer-based.  And the computer itself is not really accessible. They haven’t given it to us to examine. After having investigated it more over the last year and a half, I found that yes, they did contradict their test results but additionally, they also did manipulate the test parameters. They doubled one thing. They cut something else in half. For example, their stories say that aircraft combustibles were thirteen tons in the aircraft cabin. The FAA says it’s more like an average of 6 ½ tons.   So they doubled it. They doubled the time that a computer model exposes columns to fire 90 minutes, instead of what we know is 55 minutes for the buildings, actually.
Paolo Marini, Metallurgy expert, Italian Center For Materials Development: (Italian translated to English) One of the things that particularly struck me was the incredible speed in which the towers came down. There was something truly inexplicable about the speed of the collapse.  If we dropped a weight from a height around 400 meters, which was the height of the towers, the time it would take to reach the ground, supposing that there was not even any air resistance to slow down the speed of the fall, would take approximately 9 seconds. 
Text on video:
Free Fall Time
 from 400 Meters 
9 Seconds
Falling time
SOUTH TOWER
(almost 400 meters)
10 Seconds
Brian Clark: It took about eight seconds for the whole South Tower just to go straight down.
Mr. Marini: The impact was about 2/3 of the way up the tower. Even if the section above collapsed suddenly, due to the structure giving way, and even considering that the impact after the section above was enormous and therefore in some way weakened the resistance of the structures below, it is clear that due to the resistance of the undamaged part below, this tower should not have fallen at such a speed.  But it fell as if there was nothing below it. Whereas there was enormous structure below. A resistance structure that should have slowed down the speed of the collapse considerably. 
Text on video: The curious incident of building 7
Mr. Marini: Here, close to the two towers, was another large tower, which was by the debris from the tower that collapsed. 
Professor Steven Jones: This building – a huge 47-story building – was never hit by a jet. Yet, it came down that same day – seven hours after the last tower fell. Seven hours later. The measure the time of fall is almost free fall speed. 
Narrator: The collapse of the North Tower inflicted some damage to Building Seven, causing fires to ignite on a few floors.  Even the official version admits that fire has a low probability of causing the collapse.  But why does total collapse take place? And why does it occur at free fall speed?
Professor Steven Jones: As I saw the collapse of the WTC Seven, I realized this is something that needed to be studied and could not be ignored. 
Narrator: Building Seven and the WTC towers share one utterly bewildering similarity- the presence of molten medal found in the debris of all three buildings weeks after the collapse. 
(time ck 20:00) Professor Steven Jones: this molten medal that we have studied at length came from these buildings and existed in pools underneath the rubble of all three skyscrapers.  Both towers and Building Seven. 
Mr. Martini: A mental graph analysis was conducted by a specialized institute. They examined the structure of a girder taken from Ground Zero.  When these girders were extracted from under the rubble, it seems as if parts of them had melted. This is totally inexplicable because the temperatures reached by fires could only have been 800 degrees at the most.  To melt a steel girder, you have to reach temperatures of around 1600 degrees. How could this be? At the microscopic level, if you examine the granular structure of the steel, one can detect the presence of an element that should not normally be present.  And it is there in substantial quantities. It is sulfur. 
Professor Steven Jones: We were quite sure that where this molten medal came from. It comes from a material called thermite, which is aluminum powder, iron oxide, and sulfur. 
Mr. Martini: The temperature is so high that steel melts.  It could only melt if the temperature reached over 1,000 degrees in a few seconds.  The use of thermite could certainly cause the fusion apparent in the steel beams. 
Professor Steven Jones:  You see the presence of thermite now, in these buildings, to bring them down, implies that someone had to place the thermite near the steel columns in order to cut through the column.  I have interviewed a demolition expert and he said this is what they do. They set explosives. They can use radio control to initiate the firing of explosives. They have to be done in a sequence in order to get the building to come down rapidly and straight down.  A controlled demolition.
Text on video:  All the characeristics of these collapses
Show that they must have been
Controlled demolitions
William Christison
29 years with the CIA
Professor Steven Jones:  Scientists will look at different hypotheses – different explanations – but then we have to look at all the data to see which explanation fits the best. You have to incorporate all the picture.  Yes, you may take an isolated fact like the plume and say wow, that was perhaps a high air pressure that somehow blew a window out, but that would not account for the molten metal or the sulfidation or the molten pools. 
(Time ck 23:48) Jeanette McKinley: When the South Tower collapsed, it blew directly into my apartment, right across from the WTC.  I saved the dust, I gave it to Steven Jones.
Professor Steven Jones:  The dust provided by Mrs. McKinley was very interesting because it’s like a snapshot of the residue being produced by the tower during its collapse.  It’s perfect. Now we look in dust and we see metal droplets. And when I saw them, I thought, whoa. This is what I expect from thermite because I’ve done a number of thermite experiments and you get small metal drops being thrown out in all directions.  And this is what we see in the dust – these little metal drops.  We also see barium. This is very interesting because barium nitrate and sulfur are part of the military patent on what is known as thermate. This is thermite with sulfur.  Barium Nitrate had it to make it cut more rapidly through steel. Barium is a very toxic metal. One would not ordinarily expect this to be present in the large concentrations that we see[1].  And in the dust, there’s a very strong indication to me that the military form of thermite has been used. 
Prof David Ray Griffin, Author of “9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions”     : It turned out that nearly dozens of firefighters and emergency medical workers had given testimony that they had heard one-two-three---seven- eight, some said ten explosions going off in the building . Some of the people in the buildings reported that they were banged around and knocked downstairs by explosions.  Other people testified to seeing flashes, and many of them said, “It looked just like on TV when we see them bring down buildings with explosions.  We saw the flashes. We saw the demolition rings. We heard the sounds. 
(time ck: 26:04)




[1] When I worked for a customs broker, I released shipments of cobalt. They had to have MSDS, chemical certifications, etc.  The truck driver had to go through training just to deliver it.  So, my hunch is, barium was transported the same way during the Clinton Administration - and this could have been planned for years. 

--------------------------------      -------------------------------------     -------------------------------------

Video:    The Truth and Lies of 9-11
Mike Ruppert: It’s been 28 months since the attack of September 11th changed our world forever. As I wrote recently, the events of the five years following the attacks of 9/11 will determine the course of history for the next 500 years. That prediction is proving to be true. Within three months of those attacks, I and my publication, From The Wilderness, had used unimpeachable materials, assembled a clear picture of what was driving world events. We had shown that the US govt had ample warning to prevent the attacks and did not. We had shown that the US and global economies were corrupt and on the verge of collapse. But the US economy was particularly dependent upon the flow of hundreds of billions of dollars from the illegal drug trade[1] Since the US occupation of Afghanistan in November 2001, at a time when the Taliban had destroyed more than 90% of all opium production, Afghanistan has under CIA and US military control, once again become the largest producer of the opium poppy – accounting for 70% of the world’s supply.  In spite of that, more than 2 million Americans have become unemployed. And the total number of unemployed is higher than at any time since the Great Depression. According to the Reuters News Service, the number of Americans living in poverty, is 34.6 million. Most importantly, we accurately described something called Pequot. That is the fact that in 100 years, mankind has used half of all the oil and natural gas that has ever been created.  That from now on, the world will have to cope with ever-diminishing supplies of hydrocarbon energy. Even as demand is increasing exponentially.  We described the war that Dick Cheney told us that would not end in our lifetimes, as a sequential war to control the last remaining oil reserves on the planet.  We specifically stated that the Middle East, Columbia, and Venezuela were on the agenda. We’ve been proved right on every count. And in the two years since I gave this lecture report on state university, the subscribers have benefited from more than 100 separate articles which kept them ahead of the game.  Well, the occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq – both of which have become costly guerrilla conflicts.  And with the exposure of the Bush Administrations’ deceptions on 911 and the threats posed by Saddam Hussein, we have seen the seeds for new conflicts being planted in West Africa, Venezuela, and Columbia. As well as in the Far East, Indonesia, and Korea.  In each of these places, there are reserve oil and gas or strategic transit routes that can help to meet supply needs for whoever controls them. The end game for all this struggle is China – whose oil imports were recently predicted by the Japan Times to increase by 500% before the year 2030. What we did not know at the time we made this tape – a fact which was not known to even the oil companies who were drilling there – was that an anticipated bonanza of oil from the Caspian Sea Basin and Cozakstan was proving to be a major disappointment. As one oil expert told the May 2003 conference on Pequot in Paris, which I was attending, 20 out of 25 wells sunk in the Caspian Basin between 2000 and 2003 have resulted in dry holes.  What was thought to be a reserve hold to be as much as 200 billion barrels of oil – has shown itself to be series of isolated pockets no more than totaling forty billion barrels.  Planet earth consumes a billion barrels of oil every 11 ½ days. That oil may never reach western markets because of the drilling, pumping and transportation investment required.  As this realization came to pass, the oil reserves of the Middle East have become all the more important for the industrialized world.  60% of all recoverable oil is in the Middle East.  That helps to explain the sudden shift in US policy away from Afghanistan in 2002. It also explains the desperation behind the sloppy and fraudulent efforts to get us into Iraq at whatever the cost. Even if that prevented the reelection of the Bush Administration or its exposure to impeachable charges over forged documents[2] the outing of CIA counterterrorism personnel, and many other criminal activities.  11% of all recoverable oil in the world is in Iraq.[3] In the meantime, in spite of some resistance by the US Congress and state and local govts against the Patriot Act[4],  American civil liberties continue to be trashed.  New laws -  just the Homeland Security Bill – permit the govt to forcibly vaccinate Americans against their will and then prosecute them as criminals if they refuse to accept untested vaccines. This, even if the vaccine makers had been granted absolute legal immunity if you or your family dropped dead after receiving the shots, there’s no one to sue.  And critical shortages of natural gas have prevented the building of new electrical generating infrastructure and threaten the production of commercial fertilizers as food production before an exploding population becomes a critical issue. All commercial fertilizers are made from natural gas.  Mankind stands at the brink of one of the most important moment it has ever faced[5] Alternative energy sources are vastly overrated and none of them in any combination can replace what oil and natural gas have done for mankind in the last 100 years. Even if they could, the infrastructure and Investment building needed to implement this solution should have begun 30 years ago[6] when the United States passed its own irreversible peak of production. Since I gave this lecture on the truth and lies of 9/11, I have given more than 35 additional lectures in seven countries[7] around the world from Austrailia to Germany. With each lecture, I have updated this presentation with new material and sadly, not once have I had to say that we had it wrong from the start. So please, sit back and watch our film, Truth and Lies of 9/11 and begin to understand how deeply how all of our lives are threatened.  Then come join us, From The Wilderness.com, and become one of our more than 12,000 subscribers.[8] With each new subscription, our ability to bring you better, comprehensive reporting that expands even as the world becomes a more dangerous place to live. The answers, our answers, our children’s answers – can only be found when we come to understand the real map that we are traveling on.
Copyright 2002-2004
Michael C. Ruppert and “From the Wilderness” publications
FTW
PO Box 6061-350
Sherman Oaks, CA 91413

On September 20, 2011 California Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D) cast the only dissenting vote in the entire US Congress opposing SJ Resolution 23[9] giving President Bush a free hand to attack terrorists anywhere in the world as he saw fit.
Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-California)  speaks before Congress:
….this unspeakable act on the United States made me rely on my moral compass, my conscience, and my God for direction. September 11 changed the world. Our deepest fear now haunts us.  Yet, I am convinced that military action will not prevent further acts of international terrorism against the US. This is a very complex and complicated matter. Now this Resolution will pass, although we all know that the President can wage a war without it. However difficult this vote may be, some of us must urge the use of restraint[10] Our country is in a state of mourning.  Someone said, Let’s just step back for a moment and think through the implications of our actions today so that this does not spiral out of control. Now I have agonized[11] over this vote, but I came to grips with it today[12] and I came to grips with opposing this resolution. During the very painful, yet very beautiful memorial service, as a member of the clergy so eloquently said, as we act let us not become the evil that we deplore. 
Portland State University
November 28, 2001
Michael Ruppert is speaking. (I wonder how many speeches he had given by this date, considering 9/11 just happened the month before.)[13]
Thank all of you. I am unbelievably gratified to see so many people here tonight. I almost got up here and said, “Hi, my name is Mike. I’m an alcoholic.” I’m at the wrong meeting, I guess. We’re gonna talk a lot about things that are very difficult.  We’re gonna talk about things that are very challenging.  A lot of things that will test and try many of us in the months and years to come.  But we’re gonna have a certain approach to this. It’s the only kind of approach that I have found in 23 years that works when you’re challenging a govt that no longer serves the interests of the people. I’d like to start off by asking a question. I’d like a show of hands. How many people believe that Lee Harvey Oswald was the lone gunman[14] and solely responsible for the murder of JFK. Two hands and they’re both joking.  How many people believe tonight that the war that is now taking place and getting ready to move all over the world is solely the result of the attacks on the WTC on Sep 11?  Okay, alright. Good. I was for some short period of time, not as much as I wanted to be, an investigator with LAPD . I worked narcotics, I was a lone to detectives, I worked alone the homicide table, I worked the burglary table, and auto theft table for a while, and there was a procedure that you follow[15]. You are presenting evidence. There is a way that you structure evidence to avoid speculation and there is a way to fight this govt. Before we start into the details on Sep 11,  Stopped at about 12:22






[1] He would know, since Ruppert was an alcoholic and drug user WHILE employed – it is hard to place his accusations taking that into consideration and not knowing him
[2] Welcome to the world of illegal drug trafficking which has an agenda to bash any leader that gets in the way
[3] US is almost self-sufficient with oil, except for approximately 10%. He fails to share this fact.
[4] Congress passed the Patriot Act, I believe. 
[5] Yet he said 911 was the most important moment it ever faced
[6] At which time he may have been an alcoholic or drug addict
[7] Bush bashing included, I presume, which helped Obama win election
[8] Obama helped ISIS decapitate-alone more than that total, in Iraq, after Obama pulled our troops out.
[9]I wonder who wrote this bill
[10] Definition of “restraint”: to deprive of freedom, to hold back iaw American Heritage Dictionary Third Ed, 1994 – before Obama began rewriting and changing anything his planners can get their grubby hands on, including the Rules of Court  and court processes – THAT surely is restraint!
[11] I wonder what she did to cure her agonizing
[12] She makes up her mind the same day they vote on it?
[13] His “From The Wilderness” magazine came out when, I wonder
[14] Every time I see something pushed with the “lone wolf” image, I cringe. It’s like a copycat concept, copying JFK shooting
[15] I’d like to ask him about the OJ Simpson case

====================================================================================================================================================
911/9/11 Ten Years of Deception
Part II (Amazon)
Private Info on Forthcoming Event
Informed/Insider Trading
Huge Profits were made BECAUSE of 911
          Put Options
          Purchase Option for specific perioed of time – for sale at a specified price

Terminology Defined
          Put Option – it entitles the owner to sell a stock or market index at a contectually stated price – the “strike price” – anytime before expiration, eg $30 before October 22, 2001
          Open Interest – the number of specific contracts purchased and still open on a given day
          Volume of options transactions:  The volume of purchases, as well as sales and exercises of a contract charge in open interest: Net result of buys and sales as well as exercises of an option.
          Quantile: Quantities are defined by the accumulation of the probabilities of occurrences of a random variable.  A quantile at 95% would say that 19 out of 20 occurrences of the random variable had already occurred
          If you knew that 9/11 was going to happen on Sep 3 – whatever, you could go to a financial firm and buy an option to sell United American stock $30 until October 20th.  You know the stock was going to go down. When it comes to Sep 16-18, whatever, you can decide to buy the stock if you don’t already have it – you buy American Airlines and the same day – hour-second-you sell it.  You’re buying it at under $20 and you had that option to sell it at $30 – you made $10.
          Buy Put option on Sep 4
          Sep 7 Exercise the option (because you “changed your mind”)
(Resume at 8:06 minutes)

         
          These contradict 9/11 Commission Report
o   Research by Independent Scholars
o   Poteshman (2006) Journal of Business
o   Wong, et al (2011) Multinational Finance
o   Chesney, et al (2010) Submission Shortly
o   Cella Report to Commission (2009)
Allen M. Poteshman, Univ of Illinois @ Urbana-Champaign
Unusual Option Market Activity and the Terrorist Attack
I.        Introduction
          “After September 11, there was a great deal fo speculation that the terrorists or their…”

PROOF OF INSIDER TRADING
Change in Open Interest 5th, 6th, 7th, 10th – September 2001
Benchmark period of 186 Trading Days – compared
1,000 pieces of data
          1990-Sep 4, 2001

Summary of Chesney, et al
Chesney, et all examined put options trading on 14 corporations including 5 airline, 5 banking, and 4 others.
Put  option market data over a decade between 1996 and 2006 are utilized. 1.5 million data points in total
They first identify for each day that put-option contract across strike prices and expiration dates with largest increment in open interest. There are some 54 possibilities each day. This leads to a measure q, that denotes, for date +, the frequency such a value occurred based upon the two-year prior historical record.  Eg, American on 9-10 had occurred at that level or more only 5 prior times in 500 trading days. 

----and these morons are hacking away at Mike Pence saying he killed or molested 54 children…..and what about the Q measure….no doubt the trading numbers are mixed with life as a method of numerology – boo.  

 -----------------------------------posted 3/18/2018------------------------------------------------------

There is some repetition here, fyi - I made notes when I was recovering from a badly torn hamstring, when i was on the bus, in a restaurant - many places and some resulting in very awkward moments........



A Boeing 707 is WIDER than the WTC - This was clearly a drone.  Mike Pompeo would know ! 

Was this artice even written in Nov 2017?  I highly doubt it because there was no talk of it - and therefore I conclude this is a high form of Operation Mockingbird kicking in!  The fact this article claims that Trump wants to fire Pompeo is shameful, considering what he did to Rex Tillerson. 

http://www.businessinsider.com/reaction-to-tom-cotton-potentially-replacing-mike-pompeo-as-cia-director-2017-11 




Someone needs to find out if she can prove she wrote and published this article Nov 30, 2017...Here is an exerpt...maybe the whole thing:  


Intelligence veterans blast Tom Cotton as pro-torture, 'partisan,' and 'wholly unfit' to lead the CIA





















  • President Donald Trump is weighing a national security shakeup that could involve replacing CIA Director Mike Pompeo with Arkansas Sen.Tom Cotton.
  • Several CIA veterans reacted with alarm to the news on Thursday, characterizing Cotton as too partisan and inexperienced to lead the agency and expressing concern over his views on torture.
  • "It is bothersome that, so far as one can tell, he knows absolutely nothing about the intelligence community," one former CIA official said.
  • Several CIA veterans reacted with alarm on Thursday to news that Republican Sen. Tom Cotton could replace Mike Pompeo as head of the intelligence agency within the next two months.
    It is unclear whether Cotton, a combat veteran and Senate freshman, would accept the position if nominated by President Donald Trump. Cotton's spokesman said on Thursday that his "focus is on serving Arkansans in the Senate."
    But Trump's chief of staff John Kelly is reportedly spearheading a national security shake-up that would involve installing Pompeo as secretary of state and Cotton as CIA director. Rex Tillerson, whose leadership of the State Department has been criticized by both career department employees and the president, would be ousted.
    "This is an awful appointment," said Paul Pillar, a 28-year veteran of the CIA, of Cotton's potential nomination. "Sen.Cotton is a highly ideological individual who is not well-suited to lead an agency part of whose core mission is objective analysis."


  • And THE NEWLY APPOINTED WOMAN, as CIA DIRECTOR, is a TORTURE EXPERT. THAT IS HER CLAIM TO FAME! 

    This is what was done to Rex Tillerson recently, 'give or take' a few lies, of course.  After all, that is what Operation Mockingbird has to do - lie. I don't have time to read the whole article.  

    FIRST - CBS seems to cover for the FAST & FURIOUS FIRING by this probably- backdated article: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-considering-plan-replace-tillerson-pompeo-n825251 

    Isn't it funny that President Trump did not even say anything about, "My plans to fire Tillerson have been in the news, you NutJobs"  - oh, no.  Instead he agrees that his decision was fast.  So the media had to cover for President Mockingbird - 
          There was no "I told you so"
          They first claimed it was because Hon. Tillerson was in agreement with The Iran Deal because that was what President Trump said...nobody of intelligence wasn't buying that one...
         Plan B:  Let's create a scandal that Rex Tillerson called President Trump a Moron.....and so they start whipping up articles to plaster on the magical world of Internet...as The Wizzard of Q looks on deciding what they are going to post to play the riddle games and see what people (aka Dumb f*ks, as Robert T Morris, aka Mark Zuckerberg, says - think about the subject matters so they can decide what to do next.... Gee, that didn't stick either because Heather Nauert got in the press moron's faces and spoke the truth - that Rex Tillerson had never said that and upheld the Integrity of the Office of the President.  So, President Trump gives her a raise and tells her to get the hell out of the USA, that she is now Deputy Secretary of the State Department.  Of course, Rex Tillerson's last day is the last day of March...so "how can we fix that?" says the Mockingbirds.
        Plan C:  "Let's accuse Rex Tillerson he is a pedophile!  Aren't we Genius?" 
    So it went from this https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/white-house-considering-plan-replace-tillerson-pompeo-n825251 

    To this:  
    http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-tillerson-fired-secretary-state-mike-pompeo-1.4573854 

    This was the day that the Wizzard of Q claimed that those 19,000+ sealed indictments were going to take place:  March 11. Claimin gthe 3-11 had special meaning as they pull it out of their Satanic Computer.  

    Most likely this blogger's date was altered from the 17th to the 7th - after all, that's what TECHNOCRACY is for, isn't it?  https://roserambles.org/2018/03/07/arrests-are-expected-to-start-march-11th-march-7-2018/ 

    The algorhythms need some spinach, I guess because even even though the 11 March campaign was littering internet on March 10-11 - it has vanished. Abra Kadabra - and nobody is supposed to understand that it ever existed. I am used to these mind games because they have been played on me all my life - as one almost murdered and that didn't work....
    So I see internet still "squeezed" out one, anyway:  https://www.youtube.com/user/optician53

    But the March 11 (Like the WTC Towers:  11) arrests did not happen.  Did Q screw (up)? omg, not the Wizzard of Q....it must be us, Q's subjects who slave over our computers for the next drop!  WAKE UP, PEOPLE!  It is disinformation!

    Want to be free?  The Truth sets us free, for beginners! I don't care what you believe! That is a fact of life!


    Of course, all this time, they fail to indicated anything about reporting that President Trump was going to fire Rex Tillerson, planned for months now - just a minor technicality, right???  It sure would have been good for Rex Tillerson and his staff to know too. 

    MY EXPERIENCE 
    That is what Public Information Offices are for - saving news for the record.  So did they?  I worked at a PIO years ago.  I  clipped the articles to verify and I think they were microfiched.  They are so hard to alter that way, though...and when that PIO I worked in got a wiff of Janet Peckinpaw (mistress of Al Terzi of CBS) accusing the DOC of not treating this li'l ol' murderer Kumar Viswanithan at the VA facility which Connecticut leased, "decently" - defending the murder as one he did because the man raped his sister - I felt sorry for the office because their system was shut down.  Now who would do something like that?  No problem, I went to the library, looked up the microfiche to find out why Kumar Viswanathan was charged and convicted of murder.  GEE, he was committing another felony - a bad illegal gun sale. He was mad because the gun didn't work so he killed the seller.  So why wouldn't Janet Peckinpaw know  this?  At the time, I didn't know she was sleeping with faithful Catholic good Christian scumbag Al Terzi, who was close to Oprah's BFF, Gayle and probably her husband, an attorney in Connecticut.  Gayle anchored the news there also.  
    I was fired for giving them the information to help them out.   And my car was vandalized, I had to get a new engine part which the garage said they had to order.  I had just had a tune-up on it. 




    Notice the pictures - the fact that a Boeing 747 is 191 feet wide - and WTC is only 180 ft wide - I found this out through Field McConnell, who founded Abel Danger - you can find it on YouTube, Patreon, other platforms esp since YouTube has been doing many bad things lately. fieldmcc@yahoo.com; @fieldmcc; @AbelDanger (preferred) - his sister, Tracey Marcy was in charge of the Executive Service Office. She ordered all the supplies and equipment, including the drones (which Mike Pompeo probably made! - that is no doubt why he "needed" to steal Rex Tillerson's job!) 










    On My Way to Boston – I streamed on internet……
    18 Nov 2017
    Barack Obama Says “ISIL” instead of “ISIS” when referring to Islamic State – headlinepolitics.com
    “Deadly Medicines & Organizing Crime – How BigPharma has corrupted Healthcare” – by Peter C. Gotzsche

    “You’re Not Forgotten: The Story of a Lost WWII Piolot and a Twenty-First Century Soldier’s Mission to Bring Him Home”
    House Passes Bill to Paus Refugee Flow From Syria, Iraq – by Lee Hohmann.  Jihad Watch.
              Harry Reid vows to kill in the Senate


    COLLAPSE – Michael Ruppert (2009) Documentary
    Earlier this year while doing research for a screenplay about CIA incumbent in drug smuggling during the 1980’s, we soon learned Ruppert had little interest in talking about his drug smuggling. Hie had other interests in mind. 
    Revolution – Collapse
    March 2009
    Ruppert is smoking.  “Listen, this isn’t  A Plan that makes any sense to anybody but God.  I learned that a long time ago……..
    Notes need to be finished  

    “US Cameraman has Proof 9/11 was a Lie” with Kurt Sonnenfeld 9:59 min
              On murder charges on first wife.  Lives in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Claims 8/11 is a lia
    Marcelo Cena – Supporter.  Second wife – Paula Sonnefeld

    Kurt Sonnenfeld Interview. 9-11 Tens Years Later. Conspiracy Scope, UTube. He worked for  mainly FEMA.  He’d been in several installations of government.  Says news reported a small plane hit WTC. Video cameras were prohibited.  Only authorized cameras – Crime Scene.  Sonnenfeld violated law, took footage.
    Day 1 – they began destroying evidence. They used the word “sanitized”
    Images of dead bodies.  Paper “survived”. 
    Financial Center/Government Center. Building No. 6 – US Customs/militarized Bldg 7:  FBI, Secret Service, CIA:  “Used to spy on UN and WTC as well”
    -emphasizes free fall on WTC 7 – this is 10 years later
    -Criticizes 9/11 Commission Report
    Kurt Sonnenfeld

    9/11 Ground Zero Footage (Part 1 of 2)
    Shows officer looking at documents – a clear day so it’s strange.  Sitting in front of a private car…Sacramento USAir Security in a Wharehous of some sort. Many members. Volume is horrible. Civilian is talking about an experience yet audio is obviously deliberately scrambled.  Man calls the officers together to advise them/briefing…”It’s gonna be a process, as you all know…We got 45 minutes before we start loading up. “
    Dir of FEMA:  My prayers are with you…toilet paper, equipment, anything you need…Thank you.
    (apparently instructions were already issued) and he gave no opportunity for questions.
    This camera must be hidden
    Incaudible talking. Time in 8:24
    Handmade sign says:  FDNY  Brothers In Battle
    (ATF-7 – Sacramento
    NCNCPS   CLP  FALLEN
    BROTHERS IN BATTLE
    FDNY 7 NYPD
    EGH PTB FTR PFB
    STAY SAFE
    More dialogue among security. Refer to FEMA
    Dogs lying on floor – waiting, it appears
    Shows rubble at Scene – workers – clean up – searchers – still hotspots – they monitor personal affects on ground.  Nothing specific can be identified on film.  Body found, bagged. Flag is displayed. One firefighter wearing flag on his hat.  Large noise. Audio is now so clean.  I’m suspicious.  “We need a bucket line”… “We got plenty of guys on this line”…More dialogue on same work. All wearing gloves at Ground Zero.  Get praises from crew leader.  Machinery sounds.  Footage of crews – see no detectives, investigators (17:50). One man wearing face mask- other workers are not, despite smoke, dust.  Another man has facemask yet shows 2 not wearing it, (dropped on chests)  Much smoke in sections.  I see one man coughing – with no face mask.  More machinery and buckets.  Woman’s bra on steel  seen, draped on steel.  Men are being lifted up high by a crane.  Worker eating an apple – strange.  “We need shovels!” (26:11) So many men without face masks!  Lost os smoke in background.  Buckets are half-full with dust – as they carry them to somewhere. Welder on crane – breaking steel apparently.  NYC FD badge shown on a man.  One man with a professional mask on.  It’s green.  Heavy duty with side attachments.  Man with FDNY Jacket. One big highrise shown.  Still standing.  Yet corner is ripped up. Possibly to look like a plane nicked it?  Shows govt van coming in wharehouse (32:21)  Actually, several. President Bush greets them.  Here Sonnenfield has a hidden camera. What if it was a gun?  Is this staged?  President Bush gets up close to all workers.  Shakes hands.  “you ready to roll, men?” He says.  Bush talks to them more.  Clear view with this ‘hidden’ camera.  Photos/flashing many times.  Picture of Bush with femal FEMA worker in a working suit.  Film stops (37:51)  Possibly wifi problem.  Not battery because it is at 88% as I ride this bus going to Boston. 
    Next film on Utube: “9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 cover up Wide”  Alex Jones Channel
    It has 37:51 min but will not continue.  I will try another footage
    “Fresh Kills” (Landfill)…WTC Debris Burial WTC 911 Demolition. 
    I skipped over “9/11 Hard Evidence” by Conspiracy Scope
    Message on my computer:  The connection timed-out. Check your network connection.  Would you like to retry? I selected “ok”. Not working.  Time 9:40.  I shut it off and turned it back on.  Film opens.  Shows many keys, cash.  All tagged. 
    Exclusion Zone signs.  “Fresh kills covers an area of 2,200 acres – 3.4 sq miles” . this is a landfill.  Objects from everyday life – stuffed dolls from gift shops.  Artwork. Bronze sculptures. Lamp post.  Fire hydrants.  Keys  (over 200). Elevator signs. Found 25.  Felt like a construction site.  Organized, material was all sorted. 
    I must have began using my phone…
    Sought human remains as primary mission/for DNA
    Agents and Detectives at conveyor belts
    Didn’t find remains of half the people.  They returned  any personal affects (ie credit card) many hand guns – charred.
    “Former FBI Agent Chief Ted Gunderson says 9/11 Antisionisten”
    Ted Gunderson says CIA makes mafia look like a Sunday School Class …
    These notes are already typed, titled “Fresh Kills” 


    Video:  This is One Of The Best 9-11 Videos Produced!    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxxXAC3m1eQOn My Way to Boston – I streamed on internet……
    18 Nov 2017
    Barack Obama Says “ISIL” instead of “ISIS” when referring to Islamic State – headlinepolitics.com
    “Deadly Medicines & Organizing Crime – How BigPharma has corrupted Healthcare” – by Peter C. Gotzsche

    “You’re Not Forgotten: The Story of a Lost WWII Piolot and a Twenty-First Century Soldier’s Mission to Bring Him Home”
    House Passes Bill to Paus Refugee Flow From Syria, Iraq – by Lee Hohmann.  Jihad Watch.
              Harry Reid vows to kill in the Senate


    COLLAPSE – Michael Ruppert (2009) Documentary
    Earlier this year while doing research for a screenplay about CIA incumbent in drug smuggling during the 1980’s, we soon learned Ruppert had little interest in talking about his drug smuggling. Hie had other interests in mind. 
    Revolution – Collapse
    March 2009
    Ruppert is smoking.  “Listen, this isn’t  A Plan that makes any sense to anybody but God.  I learned that a long time ago……..
    Notes need to be finished  

    “US Cameraman has Proof 9/11 was a Lie” with Kurt Sonnenfeld 9:59 min
              On murder charges on first wife.  Lives in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Claims 8/11 is a lia
    Marcelo Cena – Supporter.  Second wife – Paula Sonnefeld

    Kurt Sonnenfeld Interview. 9-11 Tens Years Later. Conspiracy Scope, UTube. He worked for  mainly FEMA.  He’d been in several installations of government.  Says news reported a small plane hit WTC. Video cameras were prohibited.  Only authorized cameras – Crime Scene.  Sonnenfeld violated law, took footage.
    Day 1 – they began destroying evidence. They used the word “sanitized”
    Images of dead bodies.  Paper “survived”. 
    Financial Center/Government Center. Building No. 6 – US Customs/militarized Bldg 7:  FBI, Secret Service, CIA:  “Used to spy on UN and WTC as well”
    -emphasizes free fall on WTC 7 – this is 10 years later
    -Criticizes 9/11 Commission Report
    Kurt Sonnenfeld

    9/11 Ground Zero Footage (Part 1 of 2)
    Shows officer looking at documents – a clear day so it’s strange.  Sitting in front of a private car…Sacramento USAir Security in a Wharehous of some sort. Many members. Volume is horrible. Civilian is talking about an experience yet audio is obviously deliberately scrambled.  Man calls the officers together to advise them/briefing…”It’s gonna be a process, as you all know…We got 45 minutes before we start loading up. “
    Dir of FEMA:  My prayers are with you…toilet paper, equipment, anything you need…Thank you.
    (apparently instructions were already issued) and he gave no opportunity for questions.
    This camera must be hidden
    Incaudible talking. Time in 8:24
    Handmade sign says:  FDNY  Brothers In Battle
    (ATF-7 – Sacramento
    NCNCPS   CLP  FALLEN
    BROTHERS IN BATTLE
    FDNY 7 NYPD
    EGH PTB FTR PFB
    STAY SAFE
    More dialogue among security. Refer to FEMA
    Dogs lying on floor – waiting, it appears
    Shows rubble at Scene – workers – clean up – searchers – still hotspots – they monitor personal affects on ground.  Nothing specific can be identified on film.  Body found, bagged. Flag is displayed. One firefighter wearing flag on his hat.  Large noise. Audio is now so clean.  I’m suspicious.  “We need a bucket line”… “We got plenty of guys on this line”…More dialogue on same work. All wearing gloves at Ground Zero.  Get praises from crew leader.  Machinery sounds.  Footage of crews – see no detectives, investigators (17:50). One man wearing face mask- other workers are not, despite smoke, dust.  Another man has facemask yet shows 2 not wearing it, (dropped on chests)  Much smoke in sections.  I see one man coughing – with no face mask.  More machinery and buckets.  Woman’s bra on steel  seen, draped on steel.  Men are being lifted up high by a crane.  Worker eating an apple – strange.  “We need shovels!” (26:11) So many men without face masks!  Lost os smoke in background.  Buckets are half-full with dust – as they carry them to somewhere. Welder on crane – breaking steel apparently.  NYC FD badge shown on a man.  One man with a professional mask on.  It’s green.  Heavy duty with side attachments.  Man with FDNY Jacket. One big highrise shown.  Still standing.  Yet corner is ripped up. Possibly to look like a plane nicked it?  Shows govt van coming in wharehouse (32:21)  Actually, several. President Bush greets them.  Here Sonnenfield has a hidden camera. What if it was a gun?  Is this staged?  President Bush gets up close to all workers.  Shakes hands.  “you ready to roll, men?” He says.  Bush talks to them more.  Clear view with this ‘hidden’ camera.  Photos/flashing many times.  Picture of Bush with femal FEMA worker in a working suit.  Film stops (37:51)  Possibly wifi problem.  Not battery because it is at 88% as I ride this bus going to Boston. 
    Next film on Utube: “9/11 Firefighter Blows WTC 7 cover up Wide”  Alex Jones Channel
    It has 37:51 min but will not continue.  I will try another footage
    “Fresh Kills” (Landfill)…WTC Debris Burial WTC 911 Demolition. 
    I skipped over “9/11 Hard Evidence” by Conspiracy Scope
    Message on my computer:  The connection timed-out. Check your network connection.  Would you like to retry? I selected “ok”. Not working.  Time 9:40.  I shut it off and turned it back on.  Film opens.  Shows many keys, cash.  All tagged. 
    Exclusion Zone signs.  “Fresh kills covers an area of 2,200 acres – 3.4 sq miles” . this is a landfill.  Objects from everyday life – stuffed dolls from gift shops.  Artwork. Bronze sculptures. Lamp post.  Fire hydrants.  Keys  (over 200). Elevator signs. Found 25.  Felt like a construction site.  Organized, material was all sorted. 
    I must have began using my phone…
    Sought human remains as primary mission/for DNA
    Agents and Detectives at conveyor belts
    Didn’t find remains of half the people.  They returned  any personal affects (ie credit card) many hand guns – charred.
    “Former FBI Agent Chief Ted Gunderson says 9/11 Antisionisten”
    Ted Gunderson says CIA makes mafia look like a Sunday School Class …
    These notes are already typed, titled “Fresh Kills” 

    Video:  This is One Of The Best 9-11 Videos Produced!    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxxXAC3m1eQ


    3/23/2018 

    I found more notes



    Questions/Curiosities
    1/24/2015
    I printed this with a sizable left margin in case it may be convenient for someone to make their own notes, modify this document and make it better.

    1. Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Australia – was murdered in 1914 through a secret operative called The Black Hand.  (“US Intelligence Advisor reports Covert Plan….”) “The Lost Interview”.  “The Glaziev Directive”.  (Six global giants[1] formed a 16.7 trillion dollar alliance) He also claims in 1939 the global monetary system collapsed again. Dr. Ben Carson relays that this incident is what triggered WWI.   I wonder if this is about the time the JP Morgan Chase Bldg was blown up by a horse-drawn cart filled with explosives. I wonder if there is any association with that.
    ·        I wonder if it was JP Morgan  caused the explosion, to kill some bank customers that had a lot of money and maybe it was a way to embezzle their money – if they had no family – or maybe they were angry customers who claimed they were cheated.  Otherwise, because the explosion went off so successfully, why would they deliberately do it BEFORE it would have killed many more people?

    2. Research Jeff Yastine’s American Intelligence Report
    3.       THE LOST INTERVIEW – my notes
              The Glaziev Directive …salient points on the shocking dossier….absolutely terrifying
              “The terrorists were not only looking to fund their operations from the deaths of innocent Americans, they were also trying to maximize the instability of a market crash to cause as much havoc as possible. It was a veritable one-two punch.”
              “…we found a way to predict terrorist attacks simply by studying the markets…”
                       Well, because he advertises this, they will obviously come up with other schemes!!!
              …”the entire operation shifted to the Pentagon as a part of its military intelligence apparatus.”


              He claims that in 1971, a secret group, Bilderberg Group, founded by a cabal of billionaire bankers – forced Nixon to abandon the gold standard. The US dollar lost 50% of its value, setting off The Great Inflation in the 1970’s. President Nixons Secretary of Treasury declared personal bankruptcy because of it. He claims Washington had to issue U.S. bonds denominated in Swiss franks, rather than USD.
              “Prof Richard Roberts, of Kings College, London, said the murder of Ferdinand was the most serious systemic financial crisis in the world…”
              “Followers of the Thule Society, Captain Gustav Kleikamp was ordered by berlin to fire on the Port of Danzig, sending the world to war for a second time”
              “Then, in 1971, actions by the secretive Bilderberg Group – founded by a cabal of billionaire bankers – forced Nixon to abandon the gold standard.”
              “When the Pentagon got wind of the shocking discoveries he made while working on a top-secret project for the CIA, they quickly militarized his findings in preparation for the financial chaos to come.”
                       “This urgent move by the military came from the fact that the last three monetary collapses all happened before the world’s financial systems were globalized.  They were all before the New York Stock Exchange merged with Euronext in Amsterdam….before the NASDAQ and the OMX of Sweden became one…and long before Tokyo and the Toronto Stock Exchanges stared sharing the same name.”
              THIS ARTICLE FURTHER RELAYS/PREDICTS: “Like the mysterious workings of the Black Hand in 1914, the Thule Society in 1939, and the Bilderberg Group in 1971, these financial assassins are about to decimate the dollar and destroy the U.S. economy.”
                       …”And now their covert actions are setting the stage for an epic shift in global power.”
                                 “Their first step was outlined on June 10, under the Glaziev Directive.  A directive that spells out the first punch that will knock the U.S. economy to the mat. And while this first hit will shake the foundation of our financial system to the core, it’s the second punch that we will deal a deathblow to American wealth and everything you hold dear.”
                                 “Unfortunately, Washington has only egged them on with their reckless ways…”
                                 “Truth is, the only reason our nation’s leaders have been able to get away with their out-of-control spending and massive debt creation for so long is because the entire world relies on the U.S. dollar for global trade.”
                                 “This new Secret Alliance won’t need a war…or massive political pressure from the ultra-wealthy to achieve its objective.  In fact, the entire monetary system will be ground to a halt with the simple flip of financial “switch” – a switch that will “reset” the value of the dollar instantly…and irreversibly.”
                                          “….It will be like going to bed with a $100,000 retirement account and waking up with $30,000….”
                       Books recommended by Jim Rickards [American Lawyer, Democrat/Republican??? Don’t know…Wikepedia has a lot of info about him…Juris obtained in PA…he has several money-related degrees.
                                 Currency Wars – can be obtained on Amazon
                                 Death of Money – can be obtained on Amazon
                                          Jim Rickards was called upon by Washington as part of a team who negotiated the release of 52 American hostages in Iran in 1981
                                          Jim Rickards negotiated a multibillion dollar bailout in 1998 – for failed hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management
                                          “After 911, the CIA asked him to investigate mysterious trades in airline stocks by terrorist sympathizers, trades that signaled someone knew the 911 attack was coming. “
                                          “In the past few years, he conducted the first-ever financial ‘war games’ at a top secret Pentagon facility where his analysis has helped the intelligence community assess the national security risks of financial chaos”
                                          Currently serves as advisor to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees the CIA, the NSA, and 14 other U.S. intelligence agencies…
              He claims that the US economy is a target for financial warfare that will have the worst impact on our economy. He claims every $100,000 will crash to $30,000.
              He claims that a ruthless group of actors are at the heart of this operative
    4. “The study of monetary questions is one of the great causes of insanity.” – U.S. Senator Nelson Aldrich[2]…. Mentioned in a Forbes article titled “Is James Rickards right About a Coming Monetary…” 4/28/2014… (access forbidden on my cell phone)
    5. Foreign Policy Journal:  “Having just finished reading James Rickards’ Currency Wars, this…is on their side and is definitely not democratic…”
    6. Finance.townhall.com
    7. Rickards berates reactionary hysterics for claims such as that Fort Knox surreptitiously has been emptied of gold. 
              Understanding gold’s real role in the monetary system requires reliance on history, not histrionics.  Analysis should be based on demonstrable data and reasonable inference rather than accusation and speculation.  When a refined view is taken on the subject of gold, the truth turns out to be more interesting than either the gold haters or the gold bugs might lead one to believe.
              He goes on to strip the bark off some of the criticisms of, and polemics surrounding, the gold standard.  First he disposes of the myth that “there’s not enough gold”[3].
              The Great Depression from 1929 to 1940, was preceded by the adoption of the “gold-exchange standard”, which emerged in stages from 1922 to 1925 and functioned with great difficulty until 1939.
                       A pale imitation of a true gold standard and, at worst, a massive fraud.
                                 It did not take gold’s free-market price into account..the gold exchange standard did contribute to the Great Depression
                       CENTRAL BANK DISCRETIONARY POLICIES are claimed to have caused the Great Depression…It was aq poorly designed hybrid, manipulated and mismanaged by discretionary monetary policy conducted by central banks, particularly in the U.K. and the U.S.
                       Ben Bernake: “I would like to say to Milton [Friedman, 90th birthday] and Anna:  Regarding the Great Depression.  You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry.  But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”
                                 …”a well-designed gold standard could work smoothly if the political will existed to enact it and to adhere to its noninflationary disciplines.  A gold standard is the ideal monetary system for those who create wealth through ingenuity, entrepeneurship, and hard work.  Gold standards are disfavored by those who do not create wealth but instead seek to extract wealth from others through inflation, inside information, and market manipulation.  This columnist, while in general agreement, has some quibbles with Rickards. The one that matters most is this:  resistance to the restoration of the classical gold standard does not come from a failure of ‘political will’, it comes from a lack of familiarity with it on Capitol Hill…”[4]
    8.  The Brady-Cornyn Centennial Monetary Commission.  Proposed to study the data pertaining to six monetary regimes, including the gold standard….That resurrection[5] is a recipe for equitable prosperity, job creation, ending wage stagnation and restoring equitable income distribution, and curing our chronic federal deficit. Call it the Rebirth of Money.
              Ralph Benko@twitterapi
              Author of The Webster’s Dictionary:  How To Use The Web To Transform The World
              He serves as an advisor to and editor of the Lehrman Institute’s thegoldstandardnow.org and senior advisor to the American Principles Project.
                       Get the best of Townhall Finance Daily delivered straight to your inbox….

    My notes could go on…I typed the above primarily from info I found on my Consumer Cellular phone.  I don’t have wifi internet at home anymore because AT&T sold their Uverse service – only in Connecticut – to Frontier and personally I believe it was a sham deal. I looked up Frontier on the Secretary of State’s website and they use a New Jersey address for their registration, not their supposedly corporate office in Stamford, CT.  They also have been sending me bills, despite the fact I literally mailed back my modem to AT&T.  They claimed that I owned it when I provided them my $150 refundable deposit to start the account.  I was angered they claimed I purchased the modem, since I had it changed three or four  times and there was no transaction shown to cover a replacement – for asset management.  It was obvious they were changing their scheme rather than just be compliant with the original agreement. 

    Well, I am printing this and sharing it with TD Bank and will share it online if I think of it when I am on a public wifi.  Whoever gets this, please pass it on.  If you search on these specific words, you will find more of a wealth of info. 

    1/26/2015
              My opinion, for what it is worth.  Obama could be a part of the Glaziev Directive, being that Snowden is in Russia.  OR – Obama could be the reason that the Glaziev Directive is aggressively sought.  I believe the Malaysian plane was crashed by ISIS members, not Ukranian rebels.  I also believe that either ISIS members or other organized thugs such as the New Jersey Bloods – gunned down the Sandy Hook Elementary School. Adam Lanza was in a costume, to include his face and arms painted green.  This allowed others to be in the same costume and simultaneously gun down the place.  Over 250 rounds went off in less than 10 minutes! Obama is an agent for ISIS and these countries (I wouldn’t be surprised to find out Korea has joined the Glaziev Directive) may figure if our country cannot get rid of what is ailing us right now, our country is losing worth at a fast pace.  This is my opinion/concern.  Obama has to go.  He is an illegal president not only by actions but has no right to be in the office.  His birth certificate is illegal. He never repatriated himself. He attended schools, INCLUDING HARVARD, as a foreign exchange student.  One lie covering up another lie covering up another lie.  That is all he does, including breaking the law in every capacity imaginable.

    Regards,

    TD Bank Customer who is grateful for your service








    [1] It appears what Mr. Richter is referring to comes from his Glaziev Directive project:  “is a single rallying cry for a silent but powerful, ruthless overhaul of the monetary system and the ultimate assassination of the U.S. Dollar. Pen was finally put to paper on June 10, when Vladimir Putin’s economic adviser, Sergey Glaziev, published a bold directive where he outlined the rationale behind an international alliance of countries that were ready to get rid of the dollar for international trade and also to top using it as their reserve currency. And taking it one step further, Elvira Nabiullina, the governor of the Russian Central Bank, recently stated that Russia is in discussions with China and their BRICS partners regarding the establishment of a new system for multilateral trade. …. Find more dialogue in The Lost Interview…just search by entering the title and a portion of the dialogue I have shared on this document.
    [2] Senator Aldrich stated before the New York Economics Club in 1909, that “the study of monetary questions is one of the great causes of insanity.”
    [3] This myth is even more persuasively demolished by George Mason Professor Lawrence White…further refutations are welcome until the culture fully assimilates just how asinine is the myth of ‘not enough gold’.
    [4] He said that on behalf of American Principles In Action, for which he serves as senior advisor, has briefed well over 100 Congreassional legislative aides on the importance of good monetary policy for creating a climate of equitable prosperity.  ‘Political Will’ makes it sound as though adopting a gold standard is a painful counsel of rectitude rather than one of equitable prosperity.  Rather the opposite.  As Forbes.com’s Nathan Lewis has pointed out, in The Correlation Between The Gold Standard And Stupendous Growth Is Clear, possibly the most prosperous epoch in world history correlated titghtly with the era of the true gold standard in America.  Lewis teaches us that the real GDP grew almost sevenfold over around 40 years.  By contrast, over the 40+  years of fiduciary dollar management ushered in, on August 15, 1971, by Richard Nixon, industrial production grew by a paltry 159%.   Congresspeople universally favor equitable (especially Democrats) prosperity (especially Republicans), Adopting a policy – the classical gold standard – that has a plausible chance of dramatically increasing the rate of equitable economic growth does not require ‘political will’.  It merely requires more ‘demonstrable data and reasonable inference’.  The Death Of Money makes a valuable contribution to our economic discourse….
    [5] Resurrection of The dollar as Gold Certificates, as apposed to the death of the federal reserve


    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    Re:    Various Concerns, No Reply Expected

    1.  Source:  Gothamist Blog, 2/5/2015.  

    7/23/2018:  <insert> you may also want to check this blog out:  

                                       https://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/2014/05/twin-towers-of-truth.html 

    Quoted:  Two days after the attacks of September 11, 2001, in which 15 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi Nationals, the Bush administration arranged for members of the Saudi royal family and the Bin Laden family to be flown out of the US from a horse auction in Kentucky, despite a flight ban for private aircraft….
              a.  People are stating on Twitter that the government owes us explanations on why the Saudi Royals were flown back to Saudi Arabia two days after 9/11 hit. 
              b. I responded that there are things that should be discussed within our intelligence only; that’s why we have them
                       i. It is my personal impression that this Saudi-born strays, who had been apparently living in Afghanistan and Pakistan for years, were basically “prodigals” from Saudi Arabia. 
                       ii. By selecting a date when the Saudi Royals were in town, so to speak, they were implicating them.
                       iii. The recent death of their king is tragic, concerning.  Despite his age, it may have been untimely.
                       iv. Basically, I feel our country is raped right now. We trust; we are betrayed.  President Bush had good relations with Saudis, which was in part, no doubt why he had no concern about an attack. After that, there was no stone left unturned, though the Bush Administration was greatly shook up constantly, which accusations by the democrats, which I believe were majority in the House and possibly Senate.  I can’t verify as I am typing this because I don’t have wifi and have been excessively using my data on my cell phone because of a personal sense of urgency.  Maybe, I think, my concerns and thoughts may be useful. 
                       v.   If there was false information, those responsible should be exposed.
                       vi. There are just some things you don’t tell the whole public!  It damages good relations with other countries!  They, in fact, will think you don’t trust them!
                       vii. Assurance that an event like this will never happen again should be enough.
                                 Vii(a)  Yet because Obama has done everything he can to weaken our ability for defense, through many tactics, I don’t have that assurance right now.  My anxiety level is high, in fact. He is a dangerous person.  Democrats who conspire with him are dangerous people.  I lost all desire to have anything to do with the dem politicians in Connecticut after Sandy Hook Massacre!  There are very strange name-parallels and use of common words which establishes more probable cause.
    2. Various words and phrases which come to my mind and are concerning
    Sandy Hook – Hurricane Sandy – mayor of Milford’s wife’s first name is Sandy
    Most of the teachers/staff at Sandy Hook went to Southern Connecticut State Univ.
    Gov Malloy obviously has a belief that even bad publicity is good publicity because he gets attention
              “Scandal brings business” – said by Judge Blue at the Hayes trial before court opened up. He said it to the newscasters that attended and they laughed.  It made me sick.

    The name FRANCIS
     – Pope Francis replaced the Pope who resigned, which never had been done before in history

    The name  Marshall – FRANCIS/FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS = Obama’s real father
    Recently 3 yr old Jeramiah MARSH died, frozen to death. Was this a jihad? To raise money?

    There isn’t much here, but I just have a great feeling that these ISIS/terrorists/jihadists are doing things with names and numbers – possibly to convince others to join or their members to believe that they are doing Allah’s will to slaughter people. Meantime, the leaders are enjoying their tricks and mind control!

    Obama has had significant access to mind control techniques.  The Clintons have as well.  President Carter was not like them, had no agenda except truly believed that there were more good people than bad in this world.[1] 
    2. More on Gothamist (Same Article as above)
    “Let’s put it out there”, Massachusetts Rep Stephen Lynch (Democrat. Assumed office 1-3-2013. Born 3-31-1955. Stephen FRANCIS Lynch) FUBAR feels inadequate to describe a world in which a would be 9/11 hijacker helps a group of 9/11 victims to pry the truth from a government that ignored or hid evidence that their close allies may have had something to do with the attack that spurred two wars and cost trillions of dollars and countless lives./Zacarias Moussaoui, a defiant former Al Qaeda member who was sentenced to life in prison in 2006 (A federal judge told him at sentencing that he’d never get a chance to speak again…You will die with a whimper) has agreed to testify on behalf of a group of family members of 9/11 victims suing Saudi Arabia for allegedly funding the attacks…..Mr. Moussaoui said[2] he acted as a courier for Bin Laden, carrying personal messages to prominent Saudi princes and clerics. And he described his training in Qaeda camps in Afghanistan.[3]….”I was supposed to go to Washington and go with him” to “find a location where it may be suitable to launch a Stinger attack and then, after, be able to escape”[4]....Moussaoui also testified that billionaire Prince al-Waleed bin Talal, and longtime Saudi ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar Bin Sultan[5], were among the Saudi royals who were on Al Qaeda’s list of contributors….Osama seethed at American military presence in his country[6]… (Mark Danner) Behind the notion that an American intervention will make of Iraq “the first Arab democracy”, as Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz put it[7]…President Obama personally promised at least two 9/11 family members that the pages would be declassified, including William Doyle, who lost his son Joseph in the World Trade Center.  He said, “Bill I know about the pages. I promise I am going to get them released.” Doyle told the Times.[8]

    Summary

    I presume there would be many now who feel similar to what I do but I don’t get out much.
    I don’t have wifi in my apartment because AT&T made a sham deal with Frontier ONLY in Connecticut! And Frontier has the monopoly here!  I don’t trust them and I cherish my freedom!
    I have created some posts which I want to put on Facebook and Twitter today. I will have to take my laptop over to Starbucks despite the snow we had last night.  My eyes are getting tired from using the Android.  And strangely, my Android jumped off the table I was at yesterday, when I leaned over.  Because it was on vibrate, I wouldn’t be surprised that some coward hired detective called it to make it fall.  The glass on the cover is cracked now. I should have taken out insurance on the phone. I didn’t realize the glass broke that easily. My Kindle doesn’t crack like that. Nevertheless, it is too late to take it out.  Consumer Cellular suggested I call a repair store.  I did not even know they existed.  I called iCracked Professional, which actually has a location right near where I live, but I am waiting for a return call.  I only have $32.89 in my checking account.  I got no food stamps this month because of more dishonest practices AT THE COST OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT by the Connecticut Department of Social Services.
    FedLoans is still a nightmare because they fail to respond to my CEASE & DESIST letter sent over a year ago.  They fail to do anything, but lie!
    I have scanned in my recent documentation and will attach it with this message.  I can’t help anyone because I can’t even help myself! All I can do is relay problems! 
    Paul Wolfowitz was born Dec 22, 1943.  He is a former President of the World Bank. He was Deputy Secretary of Defense from 2001-2005.  Gordon R. England replaced him. I would not presume that he wants to do away with the Federal Reserve, yet media make implications of matters that are controversial and try to get the public believe something that is not there.  Obama’s Operation AIR, as I would call it! Because there is no substance to most of what he says!
    Clare Selgin Wolfowitz also shown, but I did not look her up on my phone.
     nRespectfully,

    Anne M. Bradley



    [1] My father stayed a republican when President Carter was in office, yet he made a personal decision to give his life to God when he almost died because of a doctor who was supposed to give him medicine for low blood pressure and he had high blood pressure med instead.  Though they said he had a tachycardia, I believe it was a heart attack, due to his symptoms and being on monitors and oxygen.  I was greatly affected by it all.  And my father told me when I visited him (I drove then, I was 17) that he gave his life to God in the hospital room and said a prayer. I told him that was good enough.  It doesn’t require any special fanfare and as far as I was concerned, he gave his life to God every day raising his kids and taking care of his family, loving my mother.  I told him that.  My sister, on the other hand, did her religious diagnosing but I paid no attention to her carrying on.  She tended to be obsessive with whatever she did. 

    [2] WHEN??? NO DOUBT HE COULD BE LYING AS A TRICK!
    [3] If they were funded by Saudis, why didn’t they train in Saudi Arabia, then?

    [4] He’s supposed to not care about escaping; I think this whole operation is fake and made up of organized criminals!

    [5] WHEN was he in this position? Did he bond with Democrats or Republicans here in this country?
    [6] Osama moved out of Saudi Arabia because he was not interested in the construction business. He was lousy in the construction business and his father and other family members did not get along. He decided to use religion and bilk for money – sort of copycatting the Jimmy & Tammy Baker way of doing things!
    [7] POOR news reporting!!!  They do this a lot and it pisses me off – but even the courts do it in Connecticut!  A “he said she said he said” statement is BS!  They should keep everything in first person!  Everything should be ‘straight from the horses’ mouth’!
    [8] More he said she said he said jargon!  If it was in the Times, he should just quote the Times!





    Remember this? 
    It should also be mentioned that Trump, through Attorney General Jeff Sessoins was continuing to pursue the very sensitive area of child-sex-trafficking.
    In case nobody has been keeping score, Trump’s people have prosecuted hundreds for this heinous crime and they are working their way up the food chain. Trump must be stopped because the final destination of these actions is not accetable to the globalists for very obvious reasons.
    It is clear that God is stopping at the revelation of sins aspect. The regime change is up to us once the people are awakened to the depravity of the leadership.
    Consider the fact that President Trump tried to fire Jeff Sessions after this article was written using the Russian Collusion accusations – which, by the way, Attorney Alan Dershowitz claims collusion is not illegal and why didn’t he say anything before if he was such a great Trump Attorney?  It is all timing and games with him, that is why.  He also fed into the coup against Mike Flynn, using Russian Collusion. Mike Flynn was obviously helping to get the Pedophiles off the street, and had many more when Mike Flynn was forced to resign for his own safety, due to constant death threats – probably by CIA.  (Mike Pompeo was CIA Director and CIA has always had a horrible reputation for being organized crime at the expense of taxpayers.)  All because the pedophiles were mad!  This disrupted the efforts of Jeff Sessions, although some arrests were made thereafter.
           Pompeo was making Drones and Boeing plane parts when the drones filled with explosives hit the WTC Bldings – with enough time between the attacks -- for whoever was operating the drones, to operate them both. 
          A Boeing 707 did not hit either building but that was what was reported through Operation Mockingbird.  A Boeing is WIDER than either building was.  The planes were much shorter, obviously drones with Boeing parts to make them look like Boeing planes.
    n 1998 Pompeo moved to Wichita when he and three other West Point graduate friends, Brian Bulatao, Ulrich Brechbuhl, and Michael Stradinger, acquired three aircraft part makers companies in Wichita (Aero Machine, Precision Profiling, B&B Machine) and one in St. Louis (Advance Tool & Die) and renamed it Thayer Aerospace (named for West Point founder Sylvanus Thayer).[17][18][19]Venture funding for the private organization came a 2% investment from Koch Industries[20][21] as well Dallas-based Cardinal Investment and Bain Capital (Pompeo's friend Brechbuhl worked for Bain at the time).[22][17] Brechbuhl and Stradinger left the company shortly after it was founded but Pompeo and Bulatao continued until 2006. In 2017, when Pompeo became head of the CIA, he named Bulatao as Chief Operating Officer (a position which Pompeo renamed from its earlier name of executive director).[18]
    In 2006 he sold his interest in Thayer to Highland Capital Management. The announcement said clients of the firm included "Lockheed MartinGulfstream AerospaceCessna AircraftBoeingSpirit AeroSystemsRaytheon Aircraft and others".[23] It was renamed Nex-Tech Aerospace.
    Pompeo became president of Sentry International, an oilfield equipment company, which was also a partner with Koch Industries.[2

    There are over 20,000 sealed indictments waiting to be served and they need to be served NOW – no more delays!  They need the military as backup and is President Trump tripping up their efforts by not allowing it?  Is he stalling for time so more info will be leaked to get “emergency immunity” for others?  Mike Pompeo probably made the drones that were run into the WTC buildings:    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Pompeo

    Pompeo defends Traitor Edward Snowden who even admitted via video he stole ONE MILLION top secret government files.  It is on the video titled “Citizen Four” which I have provided in my blog, probably in a Pitstop and maybe on another post.

    Edward Snowden

    In February 2016, Pompeo said Edward Snowden "should be brought back from Russia and given due process, and I think the proper outcome would be that he would be given a death sentence".[66] But he has spoken in favor of reforming the Federal Records Act, one of the laws under which Snowden was charged, saying "I'm not sure there's a whole lot of change that needs to happen to the Espionage Act. The Federal Records Act clearly needs updating to reflect the different ways information is communicated and stored. Given the move in technology and communication methods, I think it's probably due for an update."[67]
    In March 2014, he denounced the inclusion of a telecast by Snowden in the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, and asked that it be cancelled, predicting that it would encourage "lawless behavior" among attendees.[68]


    John Bolton probably filled them with the explosives – same kind of explosive used in the Oklahoma City bombings in 1993 when probably (half-brother to GW Bush and cousin to Hillary) Bill Clinton was President. 
    John Robert Bolton (born November 20, 1948)

    Bolton worked as the Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security, sworn into this position on May 11, 2001. In this role, a key area of his responsibility was the prevention of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
    Bolton led the George W. Bush administration's opposition on constitutional grounds[61] to the International Criminal Court, negotiating with many countries to sign agreements, called Article 98 agreements, with the U.S. to exempt Americans from prosecution by the court, which is not recognized by the U.S.; more than 100 countries have signed such agreements. Bolton said the decision to pull out of the ICC was the "happiest moment" of his political career to date

    Bolton served as the United States Ambassador to the United Nations from August 2005 to December 2006 as a recess appointee by President George W. Bush.[9] He resigned at the end of his recess appointment in December 2006[10][11] because he was unlikely to win confirmation from then newly-elected Democratic-party-majority Senate.[12][13]
                 
    He resigned Dec 2006 – Obama did not get elected until 2007 and began his Presidency 2008. Senate Majority became Democrats, so why was it he didn’t wait to see what they would do? He was there long enough to explain to them all, “I’m new”….. Were all ambassadors turning to democrats because of the new majority? 


     John Bolton’s War: A Question Of When, Not If?

    https://www.commondreams.org/views/2018/03/27/john-boltons-war...
    When George W Bush was weighing up his options on whether to go to war with Saddam Hussein in order to effect regime change, John Bolton was right there with him. As undersecretary of state for arms control and international security from 2001 to 2005, he pushed an agenda of harsh military response to perceived threats to American security, no more so than in helping shape the narrative


    Who was Undersecretary of Arms Control in 1995?  This was when the Oklahoma City Bombing took place – which also showed that thermate explosives were used – which is a military grade weapon. Not available in civilian life. 
    https://www.state.gov/t/index.htm            - they don’t provide the history of major positions and who held them


    This is who held that position, an obvious puppet, like Janet Reno was:   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynn_E._Davis

    FYI:
    In February 1993, President of the United States Bill Clinton nominated Davis to be Under Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Affairs. After Senate confirmation, she subsequently held this office from April 1, 1993 until August 8, 1997.
    After her time in the United States Department of State, Davis returned to the RAND Corporation.

            The RAND Corporation was a Bush-supporting corporation. Yet I cannot find this information out on internet now. 

    The were a manufacturing corp, yet this is how they are defined now:

     RAND Corporation - Official Site

    https://www.rand.org
    The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND focuses on the issues that matter ..

    Their official name for the manufacturer was and is Dresser-Rand, my mistake:  
    Dresser-Rand is an engineering and manufacturing company owned by German conglomerate Siemens. The company designs, manufactures, and services equipment used in the extraction of petroleum and natural gas.[1] The company was formed in 1986 as a joint venture of Dresser Industries and Ingersoll Rand.[
    History

    Ingersoll Rand[edit]

    Ingersoll Rand's roots date back to 1871 when Simon Ingersoll formed the Ingersoll Rock Drill Company after patenting a steam-powered rock drill design.[5][6] The company merged with the Sergeant Drill Company in 1888 and became the Ingersoll-Sergeant Drill Company.[7] In 1905, the company merged with Rand Drill Company, which six years prior had begun manufacturing compressors in Painted Post, New York. The result was the Ingersoll Rand Company.[8]

    Dresser Industries[edit]

    Dresser Industries was created from the 1938 merger of the Solomon R. Dresser Company (founded in Bradford, Pennsylvania) and the Clark Brothers Company (founded in 1880 in Belmont, New York; moved to Olean, New York in 1912).[2][8]
    The Dresser Clark Company, which was incorporated in 1956 as Dresser Industries, manufactured steamdiesel, and reciprocating engines as well as centrifugal compressors in Olean, and in a facility in Le Havre, France.[9][10]
    In 1984, Dresser Industries acquired Turbodyne Corporation from the McGraw-Edison Company, which had previously purchased the Studebaker-Worthington Company in 1979.[11]In 1985, Dresser Industries acquired a 50% share of the Kongsberg Våpenfabrikk gas turbine division, the producer of the KG2, the world's first radial gas turbine.[10] The remaining 50% share of Kongsberg's gas turbine division was purchased by Dresser-Rand in 1989.[11]

    Dresser-Rand[edit]

    Dresser-Rand Company was formed in 1986 as an equally-owned joint venture between Dresser Industries and Ingersoll Rand.[2]
    In September 1999, Dresser Industries merged with Halliburton Industries, and transferred its 51% ownership interest of Dresser-Rand Company to Halliburton.[12] Due to agreements made in the original venture, Dresser Industries, then a unit of Halliburton, was required to either purchase the remaining interest in Dresser-Rand Company or sell it to Ingersoll Rand.[13] In February 2000, the 51% ownership of Dresser-Rand Company was sold to Ingersoll Rand.[11]
    On August 25, 2004, First Reserve Corporation, a private equity firm, entered into an equity purchase agreement with Ingersoll Rand to purchase the equity interests in Dresser-Rand Company for approximately $1.2 billion.[14] Following the purchase agreement, Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. was registered as corporation in the state of Delaware, and the acquisition closed on October 29, 2004. On August 4, 2005, First Reserve took Dresser-Rand Group, Inc. public through an IPO, selling at $21.00 per share.
    In 2012 the company acquired Spanish engine supplier Grupo Guascor SL for $690 million,[15] as well as Synchrony, Inc.[16]
    In September 2014 German conglomerate Siemens AG announced plans to acquire Dresser-Rand Group Inc for $7.6 billion in cash.[17][18] The deal was completed on June 30, 2015.[19]

    I found out that the Bush Family were connected with Dresser-Rand/Ingersol Rand when I interviewed for an accounting postion with Rand. They hired me but the salary was too low and they would not pay me what I deserved – equivalent to what others in my line of work were getting.  It was a salary position also – so I would not get paid overtime.  I would once again have to work two jobs.  I was disabled by a 20 ton truck that slammed into me when I was 18, yet never getting my legal rights. Instead, I was taken advantage of.  I did not get Supplemented for the disability. The attorney made it a No Fault Accident even though it exceeded the limits of No Fault plus it was obviously that sander truck driver’s fault.  I tried to get another attorney and nobody would discuss it with me because his partner was President of the Bar Association.



    In summary, neither Pompeo

    (who graduated from Yale University and was probably a Skull & Bones member)  Mike Pompeo got his JD at Harvard - not Yale

    or Bolton should be considered for such high positions due to their sketchy pasts which hopefully a professional investigator can determine their involvement with September 11 – CAUSED BY AMERICANS, NOT MUSLIMS. 

    http://www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/mike-pompeo.html 


                                  #      #       #      #      #       #      #    posted 4/15/2018 7:33 a.m. 


    WHO WAS REALLY BEHIND THE 9/11 ATTACKS?  - Corbett Report

    9/11 CONSPIRACY SOLVED - variety

    9/11 INSIDE OUT WHAT A REAL 9/11 INVESTIGATION WOULD REVEAL - Allen Science 

    These are all YouTube videos and I will be posting pretty extensive notes once I get them typed, so stand by.  They are all hand-written now.  I recommend you get my notes first before watching and it may be useful for you as you watch it and add your own notes. Maybe there will need to be some corrections, also. I did my best. 

    Rod Rosenstein is son of Heimlich Himler
    That is why Trump hired and protects him
    Jeff Sessions recommended he be terminated
    on or about May 2017
    Trump refused to fire him, refused to fire Comey, and others - yet has the audacity to blame
    Jeff Sessions that they are not fired! 


    9/21/2018   9:04 p.m. EST 


    7/23/2018:  <insert> you may also want to check this blog out:  


                    https://lettersfromthegulag.blogspot.com/2014/05/twin-towers-of-truth.html 



    September 11
    Video Notes

    Who was Really Behind The 9/11 Attacks? 
    Corbett Report

    People Who Planned 9/11, mentioned in film
    GHW Bush
    GW Bush
    Warren Buffet
    L. Paul Bremer
    Donald Rumsfeld
    Andrew Card
    Jim Pierce
    Hillary and Bill Clinton
    John McCain
    Bernard Kerik
    Kevin Ryan
    Mark Gaffney
    Richard Armitage
    Grant S. Green
    General Mahmood
    Lt. Gen. Michael J. Canavan

    Nefarious Companies Mentioned
    Accell Bell
    Komatsu
    Dresser Industries


    Researchers have been diligent in establishing facts and circumstances.
    So what did GW Bush do when the first plane hit the tower at 8:30?  He kept reading to children!
                Donald Rumsfeld – joint effort to issue nuke weapon strike (because he is a neocon)
                No open channel of communication with Washington
                Could not reach key officials
                Intermittent contact with White House
                No contact with Cheney until 9:45
                Search Rumsfeld Testimony to 9/11 commission – crafted BS
    Andrew Card
                “America is under attack”
                He forgot to say, “Americans are mass murdering Americans!”
                There was no coordinated response!
    CIA briefer Denny Watson – was with Rumsfeld at WTC the whole time
    Richard Clark
                Counterterrorism Expert
                Starts crisis response video conference
                FAA orders ground stop
                NORAD  launches F-15s to NY, PA
                But did he even consider the fact that it was NOT a Boeing that hit either tower?  Boeing passengers of those type models (ie 747, 707) are WIDER than the WTC bldgs.
                So was he a patsy or a planner?  My guess a patsy, someone they used
    Rumsfeld abandoned his post at WTC to get media coverage. PR meant more to him than doing his job.

    People behind Events
    L. Paul Bremer – became Gov of Iraq during occupation
                Project Constellation
                Silverstream Technologies  - software sold to AIG, Marshall McClennan, etc.
                            Sep 11 was a money-making agenda

    Heinz-Kissenger Accounting firm
                They were in trouble from fraudulent activity. Failed to comply with accounting protocols.

    L. Paul Bremer
                Marsh was at the heart of Sep 11
                Bremer was employed by Political Risk , insurance brokerage firm
                            Bremer was largest proponent of terror threat – National committee on Terrorism (1999 – note, same time GHW Bush cabal purchased $240 billion of investments to mature on Sep 11, 2001)  Report issued June 2000 by this org. BEFORE Sep 11!
    The very offices located where Bremer worked happened to be struck by the plane!
                Yet he conveniently was not there because he obviously knew what was coming!  What do you call a person who not only plans a mass murder but will murder the people who see him every week and even like him? 
    Several other executives were not there at WTC on Sep 11 – many were playing golf with Warren Buffet. Obviously knowing what was about to happen and probably planners. 
                GW (or possibly GHW) Bush dropped in on them Sep 11 before he mosied on to do his freaking job, which he really hadn’t been doing anyway.

    Jim Pierce
                GW Bush’s cousin.  Night before Sep 11, Pierce changed the location of the conference scheduled from WTC to Melennium Hotel, from which he watched the plane hit the buildings.
                            12 of the people he was supposed to meet with perished
                Bremer was in a passenger plane on Sep 11, diverted because of the Sep 11 attack on WTCs and he managed to show his face with MSM to blame bin Laden, et al.  (Obviously the bin Laden family was doing less business with the Bushes and Bremer-related companies and they wanted to keep draining them for money)  Bremer was directly related to  Marsh & McClennon. Bremer “wore antiterrorism hat” from 1989 – on in some capacity.  Bremer obviously was part of the Sep 11 attack plan. 
    Accell Bell
    Komatsu
    Dresser Industries

    Nano thermite was created (Jeremy Reese Reported)
                (Note, thermate was the military grade and that was actually the one which was determined to have been used Sep 11)
    Thermate is a variation of thermite and is an incendiary pyrotechnic composition that can generate short bursts of very high temperatures focused on a small area for a short period of time. It is used primarily in incendiary grenades.

    Here is a source that claims to distinguish one from the other:  https://www.metabunk.org/nanothermite-vs-thermite-thermate-for-cutting-thick-steel.t2873/
    Mentioned:
    Kevin Ryan
    Mark Gaffney
                (I am not sure if these two had anything to do with the planning of Sep 11)


    Bernard Kerik

                His background includes conspiracy, mail fraud, lying to IRS; though he had a career with US Army and NYC PD. He was the Police Commissioner on Sep 11. He was Juliani’s right-hand man who claimed no explosives were used at the WTC shortly after the buildings went down.  Of course, the normal person would wonder, How the hell did he know that so fast, so he is probably lying.
    He claimed no explosives were used on Sep 11, just like Bremer – he publicized that right away.
    Black boxes were missing yet an ID of one of the alleged hijackers was completely in tact without a blemish – in the rubble = wtf
    Kerik turned down Bush’s offer to be the first Director of Homeland Security
                (obviously because he got flack from Patriots who assured him he would not be confirmed by the Senate with an “over my dead body” promise! – my opinion)
    Kerik was sentenced to 4 yrs in prison for conspiracy and fraud; which the court did not relate to Sep 11 planning. This was when he was Police Commissioner.

    Bremer Crimes/dishonest practices
    Include:  Extra-marital affairs (to include NYC Corrections officer and editor of his autobiography book); remarried his first wife when he was not divorced from the second one.  Hired illegal alien as his housekeeper.  Shady dealings with the Mob (mafia); sexual liaisons in the apartment donated to recovery workers of Sep 11.

    Jeremy Rys is a physicist
                “Jeremy Rys: alien Scientist with Insight on 9/11, UFO/ET Tech, Physics, & More” -  video name
                (I’m not saying he is a quack, because he probably believes what he is saying, but I do not agree with what he is saying about UFO crap and I have chosen not to listen to him because I am feeding the ‘bad wolf’, in my opinion)
                I do not believe there are aliens invading the earth

               What I believe is there are a group of scumbags who have joined a force to control the economy in USA - when the WTC bldg was constructed, it seems obvious to me they created Satanic practices to hijack USA - I bet the asbestos was added so they could get it condemned a few decades later.  Maybe they had to extend their plans because people were not putting up with their Satanic $hit, but they modified their "dream" and kept trying.  Anton LaVey and others all appeared about the same time.  

    The aliens didn't make them do it - THEY did by choice and they represent the Devil!  

    Bernard Kerik
                Claimed no explosives were used Sep 11
                Black boxes were all missing
                He turned down GW Bush’s offer to be 1st Director of Homeland Security
                            Obviously because he got flack from Patriots who assured him he could not be confirmed! 
                Kerik was sentenced to 4 yrs in prison for conspiracy and fraud, unrelated to 9/11, in the position he had at that point in time:  NYC Police Commissioner
                Kerik and then-current NYC Mayor Rudi Juliani are buddies
                            Mafia connections are obvious. A passport was found unblemished yet they claim they cannot find the black boxes = BS
                                        This is more proof that explosive-filled drones were used; not passenger planes. Boeing 707, 747 – are both WIDER than WTC bldgs. I have said this frequently but it is as important to point out as the fact that JFK was shot by someone in very close range, aka transgender Jackie Kennedy sitting by him because the gunfire was visible as the bullet went through his head, and Jackie was obviously hiding the gun in the slow-mo of Zapruder film.  See www.appleofmyeyes.2018/07/john-f-kennedy.html

    Kerik conveniently appeared with Juliani all day on Sep 11. They acted suspiciously.  Official announcement to trailing MSM:  “No explosives were used”…. I expect he is thinking this:  “I’ll tag on with Bremer in Iraq to help train Iraqi police force – to dodge bullets I deserve”

    Richard Armitage -   Appointed by GW Bush as Deputy Secretary of State (Colin Powell sure had a mess placed in his hands!) Armitage was a money launderer during VietNam.  BCCI, Iran-Contra Affair, etc. – a slimey crook. So how did he pass a background check?  Most likely there wasn’t one, which is what his half-brother Bill Clinton did, no background checks.  Resource Regarding Armitage:  www.boilingfrogspost.com – just beware, they may snatch your money even though you may not offer to give it to them.  I had $9 taken out of my checking account, unauthorized.  It may have been done by a hacker.  I don’t know if a blog can try to capture your info, but wanted to tell you my experience. I had to change my bank card.  I have a very low income.  I do what I can but have to limit myself. 

    Mark Grossman (good guy, I believe) – undersecretary for Political Affairs.  He was investigating Sibel Edmunds case (she is editor of Newsbud and Intrepid Report, both excellent resources, and I have created separate blog posts on them. I do what I can to keep up but it is difficult since I have so many personal stressors)
    Grant S. Green – Undersecretary Of Management. Oversaw the Visa Express program. He was run out of Jedda Consulate.  Helped at least 5 of the 19 acclaimed 9/11 hijackers by getting their visas.

    9/11 Debacle
    J. Michael Springman (good guy) – Whistleblower who worked in Jedda.  He said in 1980’s that CIA officials were overriding the visa denials because they were terrorists and getting visas to go to USA.

    Visa Express Program – turned into be a Carte Blanche to get people illegally enter the USA.  This was directly caused by Grant S. Green – planted by Bush, working under Colin Powell. 

    PNAC
    1998 letter to Bill Clinton “Current American Policy toward Iraq is not working and we may face a threat in the Middle East” – obviously a fictitious smoking gun for GW Bush to use when he became President. He furthers it to allude intent for a False Flag event:  “Request Strategy to remove Saddam Hussein”
                This was to cover for the Sep 11 attack planned for years.  It began when $240 billion was invested in the 1980’s through GHW Bush and associates – intended to mature on Sep 12, 2001. He and his cabal had a dream, alright!  To mass murder!  Bill Clinton is his illegitimate son!  

    Just prior to 9/11, Armitage and Clinton persuaded the Turkish Gov to go along with an Iraq Invasion, to allow USA to use Turkish bases so they can invade and attack unsuspecting Iraq. 

    Sibel Edmunds:  (book:  Bach Crim Psych & Justice)
                She reports that they want to take the 19 picked hijackers out of the suspect list. That process never took place. 
    General Mahmood – Saudi who financed Sep 11
                No one even investigated professionally
                            Means
                            Motives
                            Beneficiaries/Oppotunty

    Who was behind it?
                Kevin Ryan with Underwriters Lab lost his position.  He is on the board with www.ae911.truth.org – he is a good guy
                            Book:  “Another Nineteen”

    The hijack coordinator at FAA HQ, Lt. Gen. Michael J. Canavan, had been in his position for only nine months and would leave the job within a month after 9/11.  Surprisingly, although Canavan was mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report, he was not cited for his role as the FAA’s hijack coordinator, a role that was at the center of the failure to intercept the planes on 9/11.
    Instead of being mentioned as the Hijack Coordinator, Canavan was in the report because he had been the Commander of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) which ran the military’s counterterrorism operations and covert missions.  The report described Canavan’s part in the failure to follow-through on a carefully laid-out 1998 CIA plan to capture Osama bin Laden (OBL) in Afghanistan.
    Canavan was quoted as saying that the plan put tribal Afghanis at too much risk and that the operation was too complicated for the CIA.  16 ironically, after 9/11, few, if any, US leaders would express concern for tribal Afghanis while engaging a war of aggression in Afghanistan.  In any case, it seems odd that Michael Canavan occupied what turned out to be the most important position relative to the failure to intercept the hijacked planes on 9/11…and was also involved in evaluating plans to capture OBL…just 3 years earlier.  Apart from the coincidence that he was selected as the most qualified person for both of those very different positions, he was also a central figure in these two different reasons why the 9/11 attacks were said to have succeeded. 
    When he first started the job as FAA’s hijack coordinator, just nine months before  the attacks, Caavan was in charge of running training exercises that were “pretty damn close to the 9/11 plot” according to John Hawley, an employee in the FAA’s Intelligence Division. In his comments to the 9/11 Commission, Canavan denied having participated in such exercises and the commissioner apparently didn’t think to reconcile the conflicting comments it had received from Hawley and Canavan on this important issue.
    Canavan’s job as hijack coordinator was clearly the most important link in the communications chain between the FAA and the military.  But the 9/11 Commission did not address this hijack coordinator position, and did not mention the alarming fact that we don’t know who actually handled the job of hijack coordinator on the day of 9/11.  We don’t know because Canavan said he was in Puerto Rico that morning and claimed to have missed out on everything that happened that day.
    Kevin Ryan on “Another Nineteen”
    2009 – started looking at who may have been responsible for 9/11
    Talked to Betty Faulkner of “Guns & Butter”

    Jim Garrison was derailed and several have been conveniently murdered for the Sep 11 deadpool.

    There was a need to press forward and educate

    Researchers on Sep 11
                Mark Gaffney
                Kevin Ryan
                Jeremy Rys

    It appears I had not finished this film and will have to resume this tomorrow.  I checked it out and it appears my concern is wrong.  That's the whole video. 







    REMINDER: OUR ANCESTORS WERE NOT ALL NICE! 


    9/11 Inside Out – What A Real 9/11 Investigation Would Reveal
    Video by a real investigator
    Allen Science, YouTube

    Link For this video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZE6VUpSgx9Q  

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l2jT0X4uIoY – 9/11 Museum  #911Talk
                FBI Supervisory Agent Mary E. Galligan, ret – speaks. I am listening to this video now and will make my comments. Appointed by Robert Mueller.  She made her claim to fame for being a woman. So I am not impressed at this point.  Not a good icebreaker.  She was NOT intended to be an antiterrorism supervisor. She was filling in for the one who was murdered on September 11.  She is stating this. She was in charge of Squad 44, investigation into the embassy bombings (probably another false flag, I bet) .  Mary Galligan was in OK City when Sep 11 attack happened.  Apparently they wanted to train her how to use disinformation and lies to create an investigation that will stick to the wall – after all, she’s a woman!  Yay!  A woman has this job! – what BS! I am not going to listen to anymore!  Timothy McVay did NOT bomb The Murrow Bldg.  She didn’t even say the name of the building. Oh, gee, I am so impressed she tells us what they were feeling!  Mueller should be in prison!  The planners are all being covered for by Trump, just like they were when Obama was President!  Maybe she couldn’t remember the name of the building, because this is all about promoting OK City, so all they need to say was the OK City Bldg! See my blogpost on Robert Snogres!  This former FBI agent is both incompetent and corrupted.  http://www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/robert-snogres.html


    Those who should definitely be indicted  Of Interest 



    7/23/2018 - THE COMPLETE LIST IS AT THE END OF THIS 

    People

    L. Paul Bremer

    Ralph Eberhart

    Mike Canavan

    Benedict Sliney

    Dick Cheney

    Bruce Bradley

    Donald Rumsfeld

    Condoleeza Rice  

    GW Bush

    Robert Mueller

    Louis Free

    Dob Sachhaim

    Marvin Bush

    Dexter Walker III

    Ted Shackley

    Robert Sensy

    Barry W. McDaniel

    Frank Carlucci

    Larry Silverstein


         This list will have more names, as I have yet to complete typing all notes 7/21/2018 

    7/23/2018 - THE COMPLETE LIST IS AT THE END OF THIS 

    Companies / Organizations

    TriData Corp

    PNAC

    Securacom

    Stratisec  (previously Securacom)

    Saudi Arabian Embassy

    Sears

    Vinell Corp

    Braddock

    Durin

    McDonald (BDM Int’l)

    Caryle Group

    Military Industrial Complex (those companies that relied on war for profit; ie Lockheed Martin, engineering firms– many companies “starve” when there is no war)

    Lancaster Systems, Inc. 

    Bradley Woods & Co.

    Port Authority of NY & NJ

    National Commission on Terrorism

    Kumatsu-Dresser Industries Mining Division

    Halliburton – which merged with Dresser 1988

    Board of International Paint Company

    Akzo Nobel


    Places

    USA

    Saudi Arabia


    Official story was crafted – top officials failed to protect, received 

    promo’s (undeserved)

    Ralph Eberhart, head of NORAD.  Northern Guardian – Vigilance Guardian ops.  Deliberately gave orders to obstruct interceptors, sending last fighter jets far out to sea to fight an imaginary fleet (6:30 min on video)
                Yet, I know the planes with passengers actually went to an island and by the time they landed, all passengers were dead from chemical attack Hitler-style. They were gased.  aka leader of country (GW Bush) used chemical weapons on his own people – what does that sound like?  The CIA BS that has been deceptively describing President Assad!  He never used chemical weapons on his own people!
    Eberhart was an expert on air defense and communications systems. 
    Mike Canavan.  FAA hijack coordinator.  Decided to go on an extended coffee break and was completely missing for hours during the most crucial moments of the attack. (and nobody knew where he was = WTF)

    Benedict Sliney
    Apparently this blog was crafted to counteract the discoveries – rather than just be created to tell the public what happened in a timely fashion. So already it is smelling like BS.   http://911myths.com/images/e/ed/15877913-FO-B6-Public-Hearing-61704-2-of-2-Fdr-Tab-618-Ben-Sliney-Bio-MFR-Written-Testimony-Testimony-Request.pdf
                I hope someone can compare what this says here to the 911 Commission Report. Any deviations is just more proof of lies.
                He was born in Massachusetts – obviously hooked up with the Bush Cabal. 
    Former Wall Street Lawyer. Was placed in charge of the FAA first day on the job as Sep 11!  He clearly understood the strength of plausible deniability as a defense strategy as he and his colleagues faked a surprise as official excuse for the so-called failures that day. 
    CIA covert ops always operate under a blanket of Plausible Deniability. Agents use it to cover their tracks. It was used by literally every one in charge of protecting us that day. 
    All of our best agents were flown to CA for a retreat just before Sep 11!
    Louis Free, FBI Director. Left the Bureau shortly before 9/11 to begin a new career in law. He represented Saudi Prince Bandar Bin Sultan – the Bush-connected Saudi Ambassador who helped finance 7 of the 9/11 “hijackers” in CA, early 2001.
    Tampering and complicity – in top levels of FBI.  Former Director Free appears to be a central overseeing figure in the Sep 11 plans.
    Abel Danger Tracking Program became suspicious.  “Global Network dedicated to uncovering treasonous acts against humanity”
    The 9/11 hijackers were all listed as suspicious in FBA, CIA, DAI (?, not sure of last one) records
                Higher-ups strangely blocked or ignored suspicions
    One agent quit and expressed his outrage – after his notifying them of possible terrorists receiving FIT school training – ignored
    John O’Neil was killed in the 9/11 attacks, just three weeks after starting a job as head of security (under Kroll) at WTC
                No doubt the bldgs were already secrety prepped for demolition!
    John O’Neil had extensive history with anti-terrorism. This made him a real expert and 9/11 was an obvious mass-murder.
    John O’Neil knew a lot about bin Laden and al Qaeda – and could have stated professionally whether they could have pulled this attack off on their own.
                O’Neil was unaware of everything going on in the Towers
    SPC Tridata Corp – managed by the comptroller of the Pentagon on 9/11 –
    Dob Sachhaim
    10:32 min   
    PNAC

              Project for the New American Century

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Project for the New American Century (PNAC)
    PNAC logo.png
    Formation
    1997; 21 years ago
    Founder
    Dissolved
    2006
    Type
    Location
    ·         Washington, D.C.
    Chairman
    William Kristol
    Directors
    ·         Robert Kagan
    ·         Devon Gaffney Cross
    ·         Bruce P. Jackson
    ·         John R. Bolton

    ·          

    The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership."[6] The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity."[7]
    Of the twenty-five people who signed PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick CheneyDonald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11] Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.[12][13][14][15] Academics such as Inderjeet Parmar, Phillip Hammond, and Donald E. Abelson have said PNAC's influence on the George W. Bush administration has been exaggerated.[16][17][18]
    The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006;[19] it was replaced by a new think-tank named the Foreign Policy Initiative, co-founded by Kristol and Kagan in 2009. The Foreign Policy Initiative was dissolved in 2017.


    TriData could take control of flights, uploading a series of augmented GPS sway points that the plane’s auto pilot could then be forced to follow.
    Field McConnell referred to the BUAP (Boeing Uninterruptible Auto Pilot) many times.  Yet I find his info inconsistent.  He frequently suggested to tell others to search:  Field McConnel AV7
    Yet I recently searched it and watched the video and it was not the same video I had seen originally, yet he has it titled the same name, with AV7.  I began transcribing it (see blogpost -  Gadget Bent) but have not finished yet.
    Once hacked, they could disable the manual override switch, forcing the plane along any rout desired by the comptroller.
    That technology was in place in all 4 aircrafts used on 9/11.  Although such technology should have made 9/11 virtually impossible by the hijackers, it could have also been used internally -
     to ensure that everything went according to a different plan! 
    ‘93 bombing at WTC
                TriData Corp was given access to all the engineering blueprints for the Towers around the same time that this was going on.
                Securacom – was given contracts to redesign and upgrade the electronics security systems in the WTC Securacom changed its name to Stratisec after it was sued by another company of the same name. Stratisec held its annual board meetings in suits owned by the Saudi Arabian Embassy!  Saudi’s helped finance 9/11, as mentioned before.
    Marvin Bush – GW Bush’s Brother. Was a Board Member of Stratisec.
    Stratisec also had security contracts with United Airlines and Dulles International Airport – where the Pentagon is located and hijacked plane was dispatched out of.
    12:09 min
    Stratisec managed electronic surveillance and bagging as well as video system that provided unique and critical evidence implicating the alleged 9/11 hijackers.
                They had security contracts with all 9/11 crime scenes.
    Dexter Walker III – Stratisec CEO. 
                No public images of him exist on internet.  His career appears to be jumping from one CIA front company to the next

    Aviation General – I heard “Morgan” but not the first name so I did some searches. Just like Tom Thumb, I pulled out plums, so – I gave up. Some time I will relisten to the video.
    Resources: 
                            http://www.blogmetrics.org/aviation

                            https://www.army.mil/aviation/profiles/

                            http://www.rucker.army.mil/biographies/bio_cg.html

                                        William Gaylor is the current general – of course!! The Illuminati cabal want to push the LGBT bs! 
                                                    If they were pushing Irish people, I would be pissed, too!  We are not cattle!  We are not cars! We are not horses! 
    We think, therefore we are! 
                                                                                                                             http://8tharmy.korea.army.mil/safety/Toolbox/Resources/Publications/AR600_105.pdf
    Kuwaiti American Corp (mentioned but I missed some info)
                Resources

                            (post picture of Marvin Bush right here on this blog post)


                http://www.kafcokw.com/contact.php - Kuwiati American FoodStuff Co – WTF is this?

                http://www.kafcokw.com/about.html
                                 We're about focus, passion, execution, and a great experience for our consumer. We love what we do, we do it well and it shows. But what truly sets us apart is our vision is our attitude challenges us to take risks others in the industry won't take, and forces us to think everyday about how we can help our restaurants in every level of the business.
    The result is a portfolio of great concepts that consumers love. Each of our breakthrough brands is unique in its own right. We combine braggable food with a healthy twist to create fresh, innovative concepts in environments that resonate with consumers.
                                        Leverage of a Portfolio Company from recruiting to real estate, and from purchasing to marketing, KAFCO Brands achieves a significant advantage in the marketplace by using the leverage among its' multiple brands in order to strengthen each of those brands. This leverage provides unique opportunities and is the most compelling reason for a true portfolio company. Skilled and Seasoned Management from the top of the organization and with every KAFCO Brands, our company is becoming known across the Middle East for people with vision, energy, professionalism, and talent-and that is just the beginning of our success. We are also building a management team known for focus and discipline, at a time when the marketplace demands nothing less. Breakthrough Brands Our brands are compelling in every way-tasty, healthy food in an enjoyable and inviting atmosphere. From our food to our people to our experience, KAFCO Brands is raising the bar every day as we reinvent the restaurant industry.


                His wife was involved with insider trading, using Sep 11 attack knowledge. She was never investigated.
    9/11 Commission passed her by also.  They didn’t even investigate Stratisec!
    (resuming notes from video) 9/11 Commission passed her by also. they didn’t even investigate Stratisec.
    All three had relationship with Kuwaiti Royalty
    Walker
    Shackley
    Robert Sensy
    They were involved with aviation and security operations

    Barry W. McDaniel – Stratisec’s CEO
    Former material arms distributor for US Army Corps of Engineers
                And John Bolton was undersecretary of Firearms and Weaponry on Sep 11!
                He also has Black Ops from Sears; would trade
                            Vinell Corp, Braddock, Durin, McDonald (BDM Int’l) w/ Frank Carlucci of Carlyle Group – heavily tied to Military Industrial Complex
                            Carlucci also worked closely with Cheney, Rumsfeld during Nixon Administration. He was a Black Ops guy.  OMG – I could add more resources on all this stuff!  I would never get my notes typed, though. I may add some later.
    Lancaster Systems, Inc.  – Elites State Supply Company with Dick Cheney’s old business partner, Bruce Bradley of Bradley Woods & Co.
    Stratisec also managed badging and video surveillance at WTC
    1993-2001 – a decade of unrestricted security access to the buildings!

    May 2001 
                Port Authority of NY & NJ
                Technically owned the WTC complex – they lost a 10-yr battle with insurance companies, leaving it to fund a $1 @ billion project with money it didn’t have.  2 months later, Larry Silverstein decided to purchase the WTC and promptly insured them for billions of dollars in case of a terrorist attack.
    14:44 min
    9/11 happened just 6 weeks later and Silverstein was awarded $2.8 Billion settlement. He made millions on that deal!
                I bet the WTC was deliberately built with asbestos – set up to fail!  How many times do the big TV business moguls emphasize failure brings success?  All a probable agenda to get this in people’s heads to probably cover up the biggest scam ever, against the whole world!  By the globalists who are NWOs!  They are both Republicans and Democrats! This would explain the Satanic planning of floors and names – all as part of their agenda to make the Bible Believers that this was all prophesied in Revelations as a means of mind control.  One can argue that the ones who believe this are not right with God, then.  Nevertheless, I believe this False Flag event started with the planning of the WTC.  I do not believe the architect from China knew what they were up to. He was a very nice, devout, respectable man.  But other Chinese businessmen may have been in on it.  What are the causes?  What are the effects?  Isn’t it obvious? 
    At 8:48 am. Sep 11, he says American Airlines Flight 11 slams into Marsh & McLennon’s secure computer room and offices above, 93d floor of North Tower 1.  One of the Marsh’s executives, L. Paul Bremer
    and happens to be Chairman of National Commission on Terrorism
    He was an old school neocon.  Kissenger Aid who worked alongside
    Dick and Don in Ford Administration. 
    Bremer decides to skip work in the Towers that day. He visits MSNBC TV studio to be a media hero, which helped him become the first person ever to direct blame on bin Laden and Iraq.  He called for severe military response.  Bremer became the Iraq Occupation Governor – Saddam Hussein’s replacement.  One of the prime architects of the Iraq War!  Bremer also sat on the Board of Kumatsu-Dresser Industries Mining Division in the late 90’s when it developed a thermite plasma charge which could demolish steel and concrete structures with high efficiency without secondary problems due to noise and dust.
    Dresser merged with Halliburton in 1988. 
    Bremer also sat on the Board of International Paint Company’s Management Firm, Akzo Nobel.  They developed a spray on fire proofing insulation for skyscrapers called “Interchar”.  In years leading up to 9/11 several of the floors in the area of the impact were renovated and remodeled.  Many received complete fire proofing upgrades, forensic evidence of thermite was found and confirmed by multiple scientists using uncontaminated WTC dust samples.  Extreme persistent heat levels were reported by the FDNY and WTC cleanup crews.  All Strong evidence that high temp accelerants such as thermite were used to assist in the destruction of the Towers.  The government even suppressed news videos of NY Fire Dept making multiple reports of large explosions and secondary devices inside the Towers, as well as a clean up operation where a pile of red smoldering concrete burned underground for 3 entire months.  Firefighters reported flowing steel, like you were in a foundry. 
    2009.  Scientists found the smoking gun by analyzing samples of WTC dust that had been preserved since 9/11 and found the dust contained tiny flakes of unreactive thermitic material as well as reactive thermite/thermate since Steve Jones did a full study at the University in Oregon, which fired him just because they wanted to cover up his study!  (Brigham-Young Univ) They also tested the pieces for reactivity and found some had not fully exploded and they were still able to “explode” – I saw the films and I saw them react.  www.ae911truth.org
    as well as a large number of iron-enriched microspheres in which are after product of a thermite reaction. Multiple labs now confirm it was definitely there and definitely not natural – didn’t get there by accident. Debris pile also displayed evidence of high order damage which under NEPA (National Environmental Protective Act) required officials to test for use of explosives or incendiaries. 
    17:30 min
    Surprisingly, this was never done, as FBI and FEMA claimed control over the debris and began shipping it to NJ –
    where it could be sorted and scrapped clean before analysis and storage.  Although normally the FBI would take great care to preserve the crime scene and collect as much evidence as possible with minimal disturbances. The exact opposite happened with 9/11.  (to be continued, I am slower than I hoped getting this done - sorry)

    7/23/2018  - COMPLETED 

    Everything was cleaned up and destroyed as fast as possible.  The frantic search for survivors and bodies proved to be the perfect cover, even though they stopped finding people alive after only the first few hours.  William Rodrigues, the last man out, only survived because he dove under the fire truck as the Towers collapsed.  Toxic dust clouds filled the skyline and were picked up on the satellite images from space. 
    (so where are the plane images from space?)
    The damage seen on 9/11 was so massive it’s hardly fathomable that two airplanes could have caused that much destruction.  The two towers had 4-core box columns in the center of the floor plan, which carried nearly the entire structural load of the buildings.  All the stairwells and elevator shafts were also located in and around these columns, which once inside the elevator shafts would have complete and total access to the entire core of the buildings.  With all the unoccupied floors of the towers, it would have been a sinch to covertly rig the Twin Towers with the explosives once inside those elevator shafts. Around the same time, Stratisec took over the security of the WTC.  In 1994, Ace Elevator Company won contracts at the WTC over the larger and more well-known OTIS.  Seven years later, just a few months before 9/11, ACE Elevator workers began a full scale elevator upgrade in both towers.
                (This is questionable, considering ownership of the WTC changed hands and how could they have been contracted by the new owner so soon? Were they paid seven years in advance?)
                (Donald Trump had pursued purchasing WTC when it came up for sale. 
                            Why did he back out?
                            Why did he back out before or after the “upgrade”?
                            Why was there no building inspection at the time of sale?
    The elevator shafts gave access to the main structural steel of the building and would have been a perfect opportunity to install demolition devices all over the entire core of the building – completely hidden from sight, unknown to workers and occupants within the Towers. When the planes struck the Towers, all the ACE elevator employees mysteriously vanished instead of offering to help operate the elevators and evacuate the buildings as they would typically do in emergencies. Like Stratisec, Inc., ACE Elevator also went bankrupt and dissolved shortly after 9/11. 
                (the bankruptcies obviously planned before the attack!)
    Turner Construction, a huge mafia-connected construction firm in NYC, did a lot of work inside the Towers in the years leading up to 9/11, including several complete fire proofing upgrades on the same floors that would be hit by the airplanes on 9/11.  The fire proofing in these areas was applied double-thick so cordage could have easily been hidden beneath or even ----oops--- cover devices on key trusses.  Final charges could have been placed and wired up the weekend before 9/11 during those unusual power-downs and evacuations that were reported.
    The controlled demolition hypothesis is not outside the realm of possibilities once you’ve done the research. Especially when one considers Building 7 – the third WTC building which mysteriously collapsed late in the day on 9/11.  WTC 7 tenants include FBI, Secret Service, and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) – which investigates stock market and securities fraud.  In 2001, the SEC in WTC 7 was investigating Enron and WorldCom, the two largest securities scandals at the time.  Enron was a Madoff-style Pyramid Scheme – a fraud energy company which helped bankroll $2 million for Bush-Cheney campaign. This was their payback!  Investments which it stole from investors, while Bush and Cheney used the office to deregulate the oil and gas industry in Enron’s favor.  Bush Started as the Governor of TX and then moving to the White House.  Luckily for their pals at Enron, everything required to prosecute them was massive financial crimes – and were destroyed when WTC 7 came crashing to the ground late in the day on 9/11.
                (where are the satellite images of that?)
    Now the government and a few stubborn defenders still try to hold onto the theory that Bldg 7 was somehow this anomaly and steel frame high rise building construction, as it is the only skyscraper that has ever suffered total spontaneous collapse by fire in 100 years of skyscraper construction worldwide.
                (no wonder they’ve been using lasers to cause fires – to infer that was what was used on 9/11!)
    It fell through the path of most resistance at the rate of gravity.  Now the government lies all the time. The physics of free fall – not so much! The top floors cannot fall through the entire structural resistance of a building as fast as they would free fall through air.  Yet even NIST, the National Institute For Standard Technology, would be forced to admit that Building 7 did in fact fall at freefall acceleration.  Random fires and even serious façade damage caused by the North Tower collapse cannot cause a building to fall so symmetrically and suddenly straight into itself at the rate of gravity.  Multiple physics papers have been written on this subject and passed per review. There is obviously another answer for why would WTC 7 collapse the way it did on Sep 11 and why the government continues to ignore it and pretend it knows nothing about it.  Donald Rumsfeld has been asked about what he thought of Building 7 more than once, and his responses have been most unusual. 
                Rumsfeld:     What is Building 7? I have no idea, I have never heard that.
    23:01 min
    How could Donald Rumsfeld not know about Bldg 7 when he and Cheney were both board members of Solomon Smith & Barney – the largest tenant in WTC 7 offices on all but 10 of the 37 floors – over 1.2 million sf of office space?  Donald Rumsfeld served as Chairman of the SSB International Advisory Board since its first meeting in 1979.  He had to resign in 2001 when he was confirmed as Bush’s Defense Secretary.
                (I wonder who preceded him that year?)
    Cheney also resigned from the Board upon becoming Bush’s VP around the same time. 
    GW Bush was inaugurated in January 2000. 
    So Donald obviously knows a lot more about Bldg 7 than he pretends to.  There was one major reconstruction that took place inside of WTC 7 which could have served as a time window of planting demolition devices. The construction of the Office of Emergency Management – built by Mayor Rudi Juliani on the 23d Floor. Months of renovation on multiple floors were required to build this full-scale FEMA safe room and Control Center, which had its own independent air and water supply – as well as blast-resistant siding and windows –
    directly overlooking the entire WTC complex--
    in addition to having a bird’s eye view of the scene.  However, the OEM (that refers to Office of Emergency Management; not Original Equipment Manufacturer) on the Command Center in WTC 7 was never even used! 
    Building 7 was evacuated at 9 a.m. that morning.
    (Yet they didn’t evacuate the South Tower before it was hit!)
    Juliani had insisted on setting up this bunker in Bldg 7 and went against all advice to place his Command Center there.  Although the perfect advisory point to see the attack on NYC’s No. 1 terrorist target.  It was apparently a little too close to the action, and Juliani was advised to abandon it and he instead spent the day walking around the street around Ground Zero with the fire and police commissioners and a flock of reporters in tow.
    Juliani’s first orders to the media and its officials were to evacuate all fo Southern Manhattan South of Canal Street.
    Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik, Juliani’s right hand man on 9/11 would later be convicted of felony, fraud, and conspiracy charges – and serve 4 years in prison for an unrelated case.
    Kerik’s Department was also the one that found that remarkable undamaged hijacker’s passport on the sidewalk after the planes struck. Was that evidence planted there or did it really survive the plane crash and fire ball?
    25:31 min
    WTC 7 was the first to be cleaned up and removed, despite the excuse they were trying to find bodies.  Over 1 million gallons of water and a special fire quenching liquid was sprayed on the rubble in the first week – just to cool it down enough for the excavators to go to work. 
    Meanwhile, the government told all the workers that the air was safe to breath when it wasn’t!
    And now, 15 years later, most of all the people who helped destroy that key 9/11 evidence will soon be expunged from the 9/11 record as well, as they all die of related illnesses. 
    No one would have talked.
    No one would have come forward.
    All the most elite financial institutions in the US – the Military Industrial Complex, Petroleum, Banking & Intelligence Complex – all benefited massively from 9/11.  Even if they weren’t directly involved and most probably weren’t. the masterminds of 9/11 understood that these powerful institutions would all benefit from the wars created by 9/11 – and would be very unlikely to throw away potential profits by calling any party they official 9/11 story into question. Moreover, these institutions own and control the MSM and had been using their influence for the past 15 years to condition the American public against any alternative views of 9/11.  – oops--- filled the debate with
    conjecture, disinformation, and nonsense – and give everyone a horrible first introduction to the worst 9/11 conspiracies with the least credible evidence while keeping the most crucial facts, information from ever reaching the public mind. 
    For the most part, they have been largely successful at convincing a majority of people that our trillion dollar defense system was overcome by 19 Islam inspired terrorists in their early 20’s – armed with only cell phones and box cutters working for a guy in a cave – on dialysis in a small but growing al Qaeda network.
    27:21 min
    Despite 15 of the 19 hijackers being from Saudi Arabia and newly declassified evidence showing that the government knew high-ranking Saudi Government officials helped fund the 9/11 hijackers – for some reason Saudi Arabia is still our ally and we instead attacked Iraq and Afghanistan. The underlying details of that Saudi Alliance are only beginning to emerge.
    The BushLaden Network diagram is shown
    For instance, we now know that the hijackers had financial help from Prince Bandar (sometimes called Bandar-Bush because of his close friendship with GW Bush.) Bandar gave $130,000 to two of the hijackers in CA.  Other wealthy Saudis in FL also provided support according to those 28 newly-declassified pages from the 9/11 Commission – which the government covered up for 15 years.  Why the Gov would protect these wealthy Saudi 9/11 co-conspirators is anyone’s guess.
    (He answered his own question making this statement)            
    But it’s probably because they do not want the public to realize that larger involvements actually existed behind those hijackers and that those wealthy Saudi financiers and enablers connect back to certain high-ranking members of the Bush administration – their private investment firms, and intelligence network whose fingerprints appear to cover nearly every single aspect of the 9/11 crimes form the financing of the hijackers to the security of the airports where the planes were hijacked out of – to the interceptors and air defenses which failed to intercept those planes to the security of the WTC’s and their primary tenants like Marsh & Solomon Smith Barney in Bldg 7 to the rebuilding in which one of the Pentagon and
    (Pentagon Renovation Program, book shown on the screen)
    Finally back to the Military Industrial Complex and the National Security State that has been expanding its sphere of power and influence in this country for the past several decades.  And would have more than welcomed an event like 9/11 and the massive war-funding and no bidding contracts that they all benefited from as a direct result.  They stood to make trillions while also expanding great government power and …
    (Book shown on Scree:  Zbignew Brzezinski The Grand Cheeseboard)
    …excuse for war in countries with plentiful and highly coveted natural resources – like oil, lithium, and opium.
    So many powerful institutions benefited so greatly from 9/11 and its aftermath and yet people wonder how an inside job could have been covered up so long.  Well, please tell me whose in power or would the MSM ever want to expose this?
    Slide shown on the screen:  Who Owns the Big TV Networks?
    Please, some people still can’t get over the question of why they destroyed their own buildings.  (Larry Silverstein)  Sure, they take some losses – more so the tax payers, donors and volunteers who did most of the cleanup. But just consider the circumstances that existed at the WTC leading up to that fateful day.  The SEC was closing in on two of the largest Security Scandals of the time:
    Enron
    WorldCom
    --who had all their files and evidence inside of Bldg 7, which would eventually lead to Bush and Cheney facing a massive scandal ruining any chance of re-election and possibly leading to impeachment in federal indictment.  The Port Authority was already facing the asbestos problem in the Towers and would have been eager for an easy option out – the least expensive and easiest solution to all of these problems would be to find some way to demolish buildings in some type of accident or grand disaster.  The idea of terrorists flying planes into the Towers wouldn’t have been that much of leap. In fact, Donald Rumsfeld’s Rand Corp buddy Brian Jenkins thought up the idea and included it in his list of possible risk scenarios for the WTC in a report that he wrote for Kroll Associates. 
         (so why does Field McConnel, who started a second Abel Danger nonprofit after the first one was taken down by the political shills, repeatedly claim they got the idea from him?  He emphasized for people to tell others to just search:  Field McConnell AV 7 and watch that video, but I just rewatched it and notice it was altered yet using the same link)
    --back in 1994 – after the 1993 bombing.  Kroll, like Stratisec, played a key roll in the WTC Security apparatus in the years leading up to 9/11.  Kroll’s Director, Jerome Hauer, also was conveniently not in the Towers that day and was seen on TV to give MSM “expert advice” in terrorism and what should be done in response.  Hauer also downplayed the theory that explosives were used to bring down the buildings, saying that fire and structural failure caused the collapses.  Hauer would later manage the government response to the anthrax attacks which targeted US Senators who were pushing an official investigation into 9/11.  Those Senators quietly backed off and the Bush Administration was successful at stalling the investigation into 9/11 for over a year, while evidence was still being destroyed. 
    After 441 days, the Bush Administration finally opened an official inquiry into 9/11
    Headed by a Bush Insider named Phillip Zelekau, who previously helped the preemptive Iraq War Invasion Strategy with Condoleeza Rice and was already completely on board with the Bush agenda in Iraq.  Zelekau once published a paper on
    The Creation Of Public Myths
    --fitting for his work on the 9/11 Commission, which wrote its conclusions and summary first –
    Then tailored its investigations and evidence to fit the official theory – rather than following the facts and evidence to see where they might actually lead.  The condensed summary given in this video barely scratches the surface where that investigation should have gave and what it should have uncovered--if it wasn’t compromised from the very start. 
    The individual organizations outlined in this short summary were uncovered using good ol’ fashioned crime scene based detective work. These are not theories. These are core facts and evidence which you will never hear discussed in the MSM Debunking book:
    9/11 Myths
    --or any of the 9/11 propaganda.
    Book:  911 In Plane Site
    Disinformation films.  We’ve seen so much in the past
    No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers
    John Lear – former CIA pilot
    (I wonder if he first explained the size of the Boeing; nevertheless they tell a few truths to get you to believe lies.  Obviously what hit the Twin Towers were explosive-filled drones, probably made by Thayer Aerospace, which Mike Pompeo was CEO of; a probable CIA front)
    As always, do your own research, draw your own conclusions
    -end-

    Notes
    Other videos not seen, which show in the YouTube streaming
    The 9/11 Faker (Documentary); Real Stories, YouTube
    Demolition Access to the WTC Bldgs Exposed; Allen Scientist, YouTube
    9/11: The Tip Of The Iceberg; Part 1 of 3; Allen Scientist, YouTube
    9/11 Trillions; Follow the Money; Corbett Report, YouTube
    Secrets In Plain Sight; 1-23 full video; Logos Media, YouTube 
    The Lovers Who Killed Children (Serial Killer Documentary) Real Stories, YT
    **Flight Attendant Sheds New Light on 9/11; Mr. Chrilemannen, YouTube
    Conclusive Evidence The 9/11 planes were not real; 911 Planes Hoax, YT
    What Happened To The WTC Gold on 9/11?
    Retired Expert John Lear: No Planes Hit The Towers
    Official Movie: THRIVE – What On Earth Will It Take? – THRIVE MOVEMENT
    9/11 Debunking Popular Mechanist Other Liars; Allen Scientist
    Of concern:
    Senate Decided in 3 min to rebuke Prez Trump 7/20/2018 using “attack” several times
    (Does this not validate he should not be Commander In Chief? We defend; we do not attack!)

    # # # # # # # # #


     COMPLETE LIST OF THOSE OF INTEREST:  

    People Of Interest
    Ralph Eberhart, head of NORAD
    Mike Canavan, FAA hijack coord
    Benedict Sliney – former Wall Street Atty; became FAA Chief effective Sep 11
    Dick Cheney, VP
    Louis Free, FBI Director (stepped down just before 9/11; represented Saudi Prince)
    Robert Mueller, FBI Director (replaced Louis Free)
    Condoleeza Rice, NSA
                    , Deputy Secry of State (appointed by Bush)
    GW Bush - President
    Dob Zacheim – TriData Corp & Pentagon Comptroller
    Marvin Bush Walker
    Ted Shackley
    Robert Sensy
    Barry W. McDaniel – Stratisec’s COO
    Frank Carlucci – Carlyle Group
    L. Paul Bremer
    Phillip Zelekau
    Jerome Hauer
    Donald Rumsfeld – Secretary of Defense
    Brian Jenkens
    Larry Silverstein – purchased WTC just a few months before 9/11
    Bernard Kerik
    Rudi Juliani – Mayor of NYC
    Dexter Walker III
    Whoever the Aviation General was
    Bruce Bradley of Bradley Woods & Company
    Bernie Madoff
    Prince Bandar – Saudi Ambassador to USA






    Companies / Organizations of Interest  
    NORAD
    Northern Guardian
    Vigilance Guardian
    PNAC
    FAA
    FBI
    CIA
    FEMA
    NIST – National Inst for Standard Technology
    DAIC (?)
    Enron
    WorldCom
    Dresser-Rand
    Port Authority
    Solomon Smith Barney
    Securacom
    Stratisec (formerly Securacom, which was sued)
    Kuwaiti American Corp.
    9/11 Commission (a sham; they all lied, frauded info)
    Sears Wood Trade
    Vinell Corp
    Braddock, Durin, McDonald (BDM Int’l)
    Carlyle Group
    Lancaster Systems, Inc.
    Bradley Woods & Company
    Port Authority of NY & NJ
    Marsh & McLennon
    National Commission on Terrorism
    MSNBC News
    Board of Kumatsu-Dresser Industries (mining division)
    Halliburton (merged with Dresser in 1988)
    Board of International Paint Companies Mgt Firm, Akzo Nobel        
    ACE Elevator Company
    Turner Construction
    SEC  (Securities & Exchange Commission)
    Secret Service
    Enron
    Solomon Smith & Barney
    SSB Int’l Advisory Board
    OEM – Office of Emergency Management, WTC 7 (Juliani’s project)
    National Security State (maybe he said NSA)
    Military Industrial Complex – companies that rely on war for most of their profits
    Petroleum Banking and Intelligence Complex


    Places
    Saudi Arabia – partly funded 9/11 and 15 of 19 hijackers were Saudis
    USA 


                                        - END - 



    10/10/2018

    PLEASE GIVE THIS ATTENTION

    HARVARD KEEPS CRANKING OUT CIA CRIMINALS 

    Just perform a DNA test! 
    His real name is Robert T. Morris, who obviously destroyed tens of thousands of computers in the USA in 1989!  

    My Opinions Are My Own 

    That was a CIA job!

    They obviously gave him a new identity!

    He attended Harvard University

    He got his PhD from Cornell

    He changed his image to cover up for his crime!  

    I don't care WHO asks - a crime is a crime!

    Consider how many deaths resulted from the Zuckerberg crimes! 

    Morris's ancester may have been the one who created Morris code, changed to Morse code

    To protect his identity

    Used for the first time when Titanic (or the like, since it may not have been the Titanic that sank and they saved the brand new ship and frauded insurance and got rich off it, and also had money to start the Federal Reserve, which most everyone in the REAL society considers to be nefarious) 

    REQUEST TO USA: 

    PLEASE INVESTIGATE! AND KEEP THE TRAITORS FROM ABUSING POWER TO PROTECT MARK ZUCKERBERG AND ALL THE OTHERS!


    THANK YOU!   









               










    Comments

    AnneMarie said…
    This portion was darkened by Google's Blogger people, yet anyone can highlight it and see it. I tried to re-paste it defining the letter color,background, etc- the are obviously getting their jollies doing this. Here are those same notes:

    [2] Dear Quote Investigator: John Maynard Keynes was an enormously influential economist, but some of his detractors complained that the opinions he expressed tended to change over the years. Once during a high-profile government hearing a critic accused him of being inconsistent, and Keynes reportedly answered with one of the following:
    When events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
    When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?
    When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?
    AnneMarie said…
    Continued:
    When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?
    Because there are so many different versions of this rejoinder I was hoping you might determine if any of them is real. Is there any truth to this anecdote?
    Quote Investigator: No direct evidence that Keynes made a comment of this type has been located by QI or other researchers. The earliest statement found by QI that fits this template was not spoken by Keynes but by another prominent individual in the same field, Paul Samuelson who was awarded the 1970 Nobel Prize in economics. He was well-known to students for creating a best-selling economics textbook.
    On December 20, 1970 he was interviewed by a panel on the television program “Meet the Press.” The transcript of the show was published the next day in the “Daily Labor Report” from the Bureau of National Affairs, Washington. Austin Kiplinger of Kiplinger Publications asked Samuelson about inflation. Boldface has been added to excerpts [PSDR]:
    KIPLINGER: Returning to this matter of how much inflation we can absorb effectively, you may remember that Dr. Sumner Schlicter at Harvard shocked, I guess, the American Public after World War II when he said some inflation was not only inevitable but perhaps also desirable to promote growth. My question is do you agree with that general assessment and if so, how much should we have and how much is acceptable?
    AnneMarie said…
    DR. SAMUELSON: I do agree with it and I suffer for expressing my agreement. Different editions of my textbook have been quoted. In the first edition I said a five percent rate is tolerable. Then I worked it down to three percent and then down to two percent and the AP carried a wire “Author Should Make Up His Mind.” Well when events change, I change my mind. What do you do?
    Intriguingly, in 1978 Samuelson used a version of this expression again, and this time he credited the words to Keynes. His statement was reported in the Wall Street Journal in an article by Lindley H. Clark Jr. [PSWJ]:
    Paul Samuelson, the Nobel laureate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, recalled that John Maynard Keynes once was challenged for altering his position on some economic issue. “When my information changes,” he remembered that Keynes had said, “I change my mind. What do you do?”
    It is possible that Samuelson was consciously or unconsciously echoing a remark of Keynes when he spoke in 1970, but there is no compelling support for this because he did not credit Keynes during the television interview.
    Here are some additional selected citations in chronological order.
    In 1933 Keynes wrote a letter to the magazine The Economist on the topic of a gold standard for currency. Keynes stated “my recent advocacy of gold as an international standard is nothing new.” The following quotation is presented because it illustrates a situation in which Keynes did not change his mind, and he used understated humor to respond to the periodical [MKEG]:
    I apologise for occupying your space. But since there are people who deem it creditable if one does not change one’s mind, I should like to get what kudos I can from not having done so on this occasion!
    In 1945 an anecdote about Keynes and Churchill was published in Life magazine. Keynes was depicted as someone who was known to change his mind on economic questions [MKLF]:
    Keynes is always ready to contradict not only his colleagues but also himself whenever circumstances make this seem appropriate. So far from feeling guilty about such reversals of position, he utilizes them as pretexts for rebukes to the less nimble-minded. Legend says that while conferring with Roosevelt at Quebec, Churchill sent Keynes a cable reading, “Am coming around to your point of view.” His Lordship replied, “Sorry to hear it. Have started to change my mind.”
    In 1961 Paul Samuelson testified before a Congressional Committee concerned with the “Impact of Automation on Employment.” He noted that several jests are made about the field of economics, and he presented one quip that featured the supposed mutability of opinions held by Keynes [PSCH]:
    One of the jokes is that if Parliament asked six economists for an opinion on any subject they always got seven answers. Two from John Maynard Keynes. I think when we economists examine the seven answers we find that the discrepancies among them are not as great as the layman thinks.
    AnneMarie said…
    In 1970 Paul Samuelson spoke a version of the saying, and it was broadcast on television as noted earlier in this article [PSDR]. In the Wall Street Journal in 1978 Samuelson attributed a version of the remark to Keynes. This is the first citation that QI is aware of in which Keynes who died in 1946 is credited, and the details were given above [PSWJ].
    In 1979 James S. Earley reviewed a volume of the “Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes” in the “Journal of Economic Literature.” Earley ascribed a version of the saying to Keynes, but he did not point to a location within the volume he was reviewing for the phrase [MKJE]:
    The critical problem was to close the “Inflationary Gap” as Keynes dubbed it, but to do so with improved equity, and a positive contribution to postwar high employment. One is reminded of one of Keynes’s ripostes. When accused of often changing his mind, he retorted, “When I find new information I change my mind; What do you do?”
    In June of 1983 Paul Samuelson wrote an article for the Keynes Centenary that appeared in the Economist. He presented another version of the saying that he credited to Keynes [MKSK]:
    Keynes provided his own impeccable defence of being protean. “When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?”
    In August of 1983 the Wall Street Journal printed another version of the saying in an article by the journalist Lindley H. Clark Jr. In 1978 Clark quoted Samuelson presenting a version of the remark and attributing it to Keynes. In 1983 Clark directly credited Keynes with a somewhat different version of the quotation [MKLC]:
    When someone kidded British economist John Maynard Keynes because he had altered his views on an economic question, Lord Keynes replied: “When I’m wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?”
    In 1986 an article in “The Economic Journal” about the notable economist Joan Robinson claimed that she had a favorite anecdote about Keynes that included a version of the saying. Robinson was at Cambridge with Keynes and knew him well [MKJR]:
    Her favourite story about Keynes is that when someone remonstrated with him for being inconsistent, he responded: ‘When someone persuades me that I am wrong, I change my mind. What do you do?’
    AnneMarie said…
    The quotation continued to mutate and propagate after 1986, and many additional citations are available. But here the presentation skips to 1999 when the saying was attributed to the powerful quotation magnet Winston Churchill in the Florida Times-Union [WCFU]:
    Winston Churchill once said to a woman berating him for changing his position, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, madam?”
    Next the presentation skips to 2011 and an inquisitively skeptical journalist who writes for the Wall Street Journal. Jason Zweig wondered about two quotations attributed to Keynes: “When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir” and “The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” He doubted that Keynes said either of them, and he contacted an expert [MKJZ]:
    In an e-mail in 2003, Keynes’ most authoritative biographer, Lord Robert Skidelsky, told investment advisor William Bernstein that he believed they were “both apocryphal.” This week I asked another renowned expert on Keynes, Donald Moggridge of the University of Toronto, if he could identify the source of either of the oft-quoted remarks. “The simple answer,” Prof. Moggridge replied by e-mail, “is there is no evidence.”
    In conclusion, there is some evidence that Keynes made a remark similar to the one under investigation, but this evidence is weak and problematic. Keynes died in 1946 and the first known attribution to him is dated 1978. There are so many variants of the quotation that it is not possible to select a single one. Samuelson, for example, gave more than one version over the years.
    The connection to Winston Churchill is tenuous because the attribution occurred at such a late date and because Churchill’s name attracts spurious ascriptions.
    Oddly, Samuelson himself might deserve credit based on the 1970 citation, but he, in effect, disclaimed credit in 1978. So the case is unresolved. Thanks for this interesting but difficult query.
    AnneMarie said…
    Many thanks to Eric Columbus for raising this question and motivating this exploration.)
    Update history: On September 30, 2011 the 1999 citation for Winston Churchill was added.
    [PSDR] 1970 December 21, Daily Labor Report, Number 246, Page X-3, Column 1 and 2, Full Text Section, [Transcript of “Meet The Press”: NBC Radio and Television Program; December 20, 1970; Interview with Professor Paul A. Samuelson], Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.: Washington, D.C., Alexandria, Virginia. (Verified using scanned images from the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Special thanks to the wonderfully helpful librarian at UA)
    [PSWJ] 1978 October 13, Wall Street Journal, U.S. Monetary Troubles by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 22, New York. (ProQuest)
    [MKEG] 1933 March 25, The Economist, Letter to the Editor of the Economist from J. M. Keynes dated March 20, 1933, Page 642, Column 1, London, England. (Verified on microfilm)
    [MKLF] 1945 September 17, Life, Close-Up: Lord Keynes by Noel F. Busch, Start Page 118, Quote Page 122, Volume 19, Number 12, Time Inc., New York. (Google Books full view) link
    [PSCH] 1961 March 20, Congressional Hearing, Eighty-Seventh Congress, First Session, House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Unemployment and the Impact of Automation of the Committee on Education and Labor, Impact of Automation on Employment: Statement of Dr. Paul A. Samuelson, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Start Page 120, Quote Page 139, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (Hathitrust) link
    [MKJE] 1979 June, Journal of Economic Literature, Reviewed work: [The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume 22. Activities 1939-1945: Internal War Finance, Edited by Donald Moggridge; John Maynard Keynes], Review by James S. Earley, Start Page 539, Quote Page 540, Column 1, Volume 17, Number 2, American Economic Association. (JSTOR) link
    [MKSK] 1986, The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume 5, Edited by Kate Crowley, Paper Number 305, The Keynes Centenary: Sympathy from the other Cambridge by Paul A. Samuelson, [1983 June 25, The Keynes Centenary, The Economist, Pages 19-21], Page 275, Column 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Google Books preview) link
    [MKLC] 1983 August 23, Wall Street Journal, How the Fed Might Find Peace and Tranquillity: Speaking of Business by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 33, New York. (ProQuest)
    [MKJR] 1986, The Economic Journal, Supplement: Conference Papers, On the Influence of Piero Sraffa on the Contributions of Joan Robinson to Economic Theory by G. C. Harcourt, Start Page 96, Quote Page 99, Footnote 3, Volume 96, Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic Society. (JSTOR) link
    [WCFU] 1999 September 18, Florida Times-Union, Editorial, Term Limits: Fowler’s dilemma, Section Metro, Page B-6, Jacksonville, Florida. (NewsBank)
    [MKJZ] 2011 February 11, Wall Street Journal: MarketBeat Blog, “Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?” by Jason Zweig. (Wall Street Journal website; Accessed blogs.wsj.com 2011 July 22) link
    AnneMarie said…
    Many thanks to Eric Columbus for raising this question and motivating this exploration.)
    Update history: On September 30, 2011 the 1999 citation for Winston Churchill was added.
    [PSDR] 1970 December 21, Daily Labor Report, Number 246, Page X-3, Column 1 and 2, Full Text Section, [Transcript of “Meet The Press”: NBC Radio and Television Program; December 20, 1970; Interview with Professor Paul A. Samuelson], Bureau of National Affairs, Inc.: Washington, D.C., Alexandria, Virginia. (Verified using scanned images from the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. Special thanks to the wonderfully helpful librarian at UA)
    [PSWJ] 1978 October 13, Wall Street Journal, U.S. Monetary Troubles by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 22, New York. (ProQuest)
    [MKEG] 1933 March 25, The Economist, Letter to the Editor of the Economist from J. M. Keynes dated March 20, 1933, Page 642, Column 1, London, England. (Verified on microfilm)
    [MKLF] 1945 September 17, Life, Close-Up: Lord Keynes by Noel F. Busch, Start Page 118, Quote Page 122, Volume 19, Number 12, Time Inc., New York. (Google Books full view) link
    [PSCH] 1961 March 20, Congressional Hearing, Eighty-Seventh Congress, First Session, House of Representatives, Subcommittee on Unemployment and the Impact of Automation of the Committee on Education and Labor, Impact of Automation on Employment: Statement of Dr. Paul A. Samuelson, Professor of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Start Page 120, Quote Page 139, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. (Hathitrust) link
    [MKJE] 1979 June, Journal of Economic Literature, Reviewed work: [The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Volume 22. Activities 1939-1945: Internal War Finance, Edited by Donald Moggridge; John Maynard Keynes], Review by James S. Earley, Start Page 539, Quote Page 540, Column 1, Volume 17, Number 2, American Economic Association. (JSTOR) link
    [MKSK] 1986, The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume 5, Edited by Kate Crowley, Paper Number 305, The Keynes Centenary: Sympathy from the other Cambridge by Paul A. Samuelson, [1983 June 25, The Keynes Centenary, The Economist, Pages 19-21], Page 275, Column 2, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. (Google Books preview) link
    [MKLC] 1983 August 23, Wall Street Journal, How the Fed Might Find Peace and Tranquillity: Speaking of Business by Lindley H. Clark Jr., Page 33, New York. (ProQuest)
    [MKJR] 1986, The Economic Journal, Supplement: Conference Papers, On the Influence of Piero Sraffa on the Contributions of Joan Robinson to Economic Theory by G. C. Harcourt, Start Page 96, Quote Page 99, Footnote 3, Volume 96, Blackwell Publishing for the Royal Economic Society. (JSTOR) link
    [WCFU] 1999 September 18, Florida Times-Union, Editorial, Term Limits: Fowler’s dilemma, Section Metro, Page B-6, Jacksonville, Florida. (NewsBank)
    [MKJZ] 2011 February 11, Wall Street Journal: MarketBeat Blog, “Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?” by Jason Zweig. (Wall Street Journal website; Accessed blogs.wsj.com 2011 July 22) link
    AnneMarie said…
    4/24/2018. Please refer to this post due to current political concerns:
    http://www.appleofmyeyes.org/2018/04/mike-pompeo.html
    AnneMarie said…
    7/23/2018 - I have more notes but that is all I am doing for today on this blog. Bless you all for taking the time to review these and coming up with your own conclusions!

    Popular posts from this blog

    Coronavirus Notes

    Tranny Watch

    Pitstop of Information July 2018